Research Article

The Value of Photography as a Methodology within the Social Sciences

Number: 2 October 1, 2018

The Value of Photography as a Methodology within the Social Sciences

Abstract

Photography is becoming an increasingly valuable tool for researchers who wish to explore social issues. It can provide valuable data for a researcher and insights that are not possible through more traditional qualitative research methodologies. The development of ‘visual sociology’ as a recognised branch of sociological research shows that photography is becoming an increasingly important methodological tool within the social sciences. This study sets out the main theoretical developments, including around the role of the researcher within the research process, that have allowed photography to become such a valuable aspect of social science research. It explores also the different methodologies that can be adopted by photographers within a social science research project. By providing examples of research conducted by the author around migration and gentrification, this study aims to demonstrate the value of photography within a research context. It discusses the main issues that arise when photographers work on social science projects, particularly around authenticity and ethics.

Keywords

References

  1. Becker, H. (1978). “Do Photographs Tell the Truth?”. Afterimage. 5. 9-13.
  2. ___________ (ed) (1981). Exploring Society Photographically. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Bruzzi, S. (2000). New Documentary: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
  4. Collier, J. and Collier, M. (1986). Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. (originally published 1967). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  5. Fairclough, C. M. (2013). Visualising the Migrant’s Experience: One Woman’s Story. (Unpublished PhD critical evaluation). Manchester: University of Salford.
  6. ___________ (2017). A City Transformed: Visualising the social effects of gentrification in one district of Istanbul. In C. Çınar and M. S. Akım (ed.), International Interdisciplinarity in the Arts Symposiums 1: Cinema/Photography, Book of Proceedings (32-44). Istanbul, Turkey: Cinius.
  7. Goffman, E. (1989). “On Fieldwork”. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 18. 123-132.
  8. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Communication and Media Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 1, 2018

Submission Date

August 1, 2018

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Number: 2

APA
Makal Fairclough, Ç. (2018). The Value of Photography as a Methodology within the Social Sciences. Etkileşim, 2, 108-123. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2018.2.31
AMA
1.Makal Fairclough Ç. The Value of Photography as a Methodology within the Social Sciences. Etkileşim. 2018;(2):108-123. doi:10.32739/etkilesim.2018.2.31
Chicago
Makal Fairclough, Çeyiz. 2018. “The Value of Photography As a Methodology Within the Social Sciences”. Etkileşim, nos. 2: 108-23. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2018.2.31.
EndNote
Makal Fairclough Ç (October 1, 2018) The Value of Photography as a Methodology within the Social Sciences. Etkileşim 2 108–123.
IEEE
[1]Ç. Makal Fairclough, “The Value of Photography as a Methodology within the Social Sciences”, Etkileşim, no. 2, pp. 108–123, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.32739/etkilesim.2018.2.31.
ISNAD
Makal Fairclough, Çeyiz. “The Value of Photography As a Methodology Within the Social Sciences”. Etkileşim. 2 (October 1, 2018): 108-123. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2018.2.31.
JAMA
1.Makal Fairclough Ç. The Value of Photography as a Methodology within the Social Sciences. Etkileşim. 2018;:108–123.
MLA
Makal Fairclough, Çeyiz. “The Value of Photography As a Methodology Within the Social Sciences”. Etkileşim, no. 2, Oct. 2018, pp. 108-23, doi:10.32739/etkilesim.2018.2.31.
Vancouver
1.Çeyiz Makal Fairclough. The Value of Photography as a Methodology within the Social Sciences. Etkileşim. 2018 Oct. 1;(2):108-23. doi:10.32739/etkilesim.2018.2.31

doaj-logo-colour.pngebsco-logo-color-scree.png