Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory

Year 2025, Issue: 16, 284 - 306
https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2025.8.16.314

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies is gaining increasing momentum in the publishing industry, as in many other sectors. AI applications, which are generally used for technical support in the background in traditional media operations, have become more visible in recent years. Newscasters created with AI have started to be used on digital platforms. This study focuses on the impact of ‘Alexa’, Türkiye’s first digital news anchor created with AI, on the viewers of the RoboTV channel operating on the YouTube platform. In this direction, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 individuals who had experience with ‘Alexa’, and the data obtained were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify themes, in the context of ‘parasocial interaction theory’. As a result of the research, it was revealed that the satisfaction level of the viewers with the broadcast content transmitted by the AI anchor was lower compared to the content presented by the human anchor. Participants stated that the lack of emotion and facial expression of the AI news anchor made it difficult for the audience to establish an emotional connection with the anchor. This research shows that the adoption of AI anchors in broadcasting has a direct impact on audience perception and satisfaction with broadcast content. The results provide a basis for future research by providing insights into how viewers evaluate the use of AI technologies in the media sector at this stage.

References

  • Akbaş, A. (2024). Social transformation with AI: Sociological perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Education, 10(22), 151-180. https://doi.org/10.59304/ijhe.1477203
  • Arda, S. (2006). Predictors of parasocial interaction with the favorite and the least desirable characters portrayed in TV serials (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University.
  • Auter, P. J. (1992). TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36(2), 173-181.
  • Brunetti, A. (2024). The role of AI in social relations and change. International Journal of Humanities and Education, 10(22), 151-180. https://doi.org/10.59304/ijhe.1477203
  • Byrne, D., & Nelson, D. (1965). Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), 659-663
  • Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2019). A review of AI adoptions in the media industry. International Journal on Media Management, 21(3-4), 193-215.
  • De-Lima-Santos, M. F., & Ceron, W. (2021). AI in news media: Current perceptions and future outlook. Journalism and Media, 3(1), 13-26.
  • Değirmenci, S. (2018). AI and news relationship: AI applications in digital media. Istanbul University Journal of Communication Faculty, 26, 18-22.
  • Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279-305.
  • Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). AI and communication: A human-machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70-86.
  • Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of AI: On the past, present, and future of AI. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14.
  • Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104-1121.
  • Hoffner, C. (1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(3), 389-403.
  • Keleş, A., Keleş, A., & Akçetin, E. (2017). The potential of using AI in marketing and intelligent decision support systems. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(11), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12022
  • Köroğlu, Y. (2017). Yapay zekânın teorik ve pratik sınırları. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Communication Monographs, 41(3), 261-266.
  • Mijwil, M. M. (2015, April). History of artificial intelligence. ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322234922_History_of_Artificial_Intelligence
  • Molin, V., & Nordgren, S. (2019). Robot or human? - The marketing phenomenon of virtual influencers: A case study about virtual influencers’ parasocial interaction on Instagram (Unpublished master’s thesis). Uppsala University Digital Archive.
  • Rezk, S. M. M. (2023). The role of AI in graphic design. Journal of Art, Design and Music, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.55554/2785-9649.1005
  • Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279-292.
  • Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635-654.
  • Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2003). AI: A modern approach. Prentice Hall.
  • Schmid, H., & Klimmt, C. (2011). A magically nice guy: Parasocial relationships with Harry Potter across different cultures. International Communication Gazette, 73(3), 252-269.
  • Stock, R. M., & Merkle, M. (2018). Can humanoid service robots perform better than service employees? A comparison of innovative behavior cues. Journal of Service Management, 29(4), 597-620.
  • Tsay, M., & Bodine, B. M. (2012). Exploring parasocial interaction in college students as a multidimensional construct. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(3), 185-200.
  • Schramm, H., Liebers, N., Biniak, P., & Dettmar, J. (2024). Parasocial relationships in the digital age: Exploring emotional bonds with AI-driven media figures. Journal of Media Psychology, 36(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000324
  • Sucu, İ. (2019). The impact of AI on society and AI in the context of AI (A.I.) movie. International Journal of Textbooks and Educational Materials, 2(2), 203-215.
  • Yeniceler Kortak, İ. (2022). Looking at the relationship between AI and news from the user’s perspective: Analyzing the comments on robot news announcers on social media. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 32(1), 701-714. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1060917
  • Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2018). AI and the public sector-applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yapay Zekâ Destekli Haber Sunucuları Üzerine İzleyici Algıları: Parasosyal Etkileşim Teorisi Bağlamında Niteliksel Bir Analiz

Year 2025, Issue: 16, 284 - 306
https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2025.8.16.314

Abstract

Gelişen yapay zekâ teknolojileri, birçok sektörde olduğu gibi yayıncılık sektöründe de giderek daha fazla yer edinmektedir. Geleneksel medya operasyonlarında genellikle arka planda teknik destek amaçlı kullanılan yapay zekâ uygulamaları, son yıllarda daha görünür hale gelmiştir. Dijital platformlarda yapay zekâ ile oluşturulmuş haber spikerleri kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu çalışma YouTube platformunda faaliyet gösteren RoboTV kanalında, Türkiye’nin ilk yapay zekâ ile oluşturulan dijital haber spikeri ‘Alexa’nın izleyiciler üzerinde bıraktığı etkiye odaklanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda Alexa’yı izleme deneyimi olan 12 kişi ile derinlemesine görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiş, elde edilen veriler nitel içerik analiziyle temalara ayrılarak ‘parasosyal etkileşim kuramı’ bağlamında analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda izleyicilerin yapay zekâ sunucusu tarafından aktarılan yayın içeriğinden memnuniyet düzeyinin, insan sunucunun sunduğu içeriğe kıyasla daha düşük olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Katılımcılar, yapay zekâ haber spikerinin duygu ve yüz ifadesinden yoksun olmasının, izleyicinin sunucu ile duygusal bağ kurmasını zorlaştırdığını belirtmiştir. Bu araştırma, yayıncılık alanında yapay zekâ ile oluşturulan sunucularının benimsenmesinin, izleyici algısı ve yayın içeriğine yönelik memnuniyet üzerinde doğrudan bir etkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin bu aşamada medya sektöründe kullanılmasının izleyiciler açısından nasıl değerlendirildiğine dair bilgiler sunarak, gelecekteki araştırmalar için bir temel oluşturmaktadır.

Ethical Statement

Bu araştırmada Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Fen, Matematik ve Sosyal Bilimler Etik Kurulundan onay alınmıştır.

Supporting Institution

Yok

References

  • Akbaş, A. (2024). Social transformation with AI: Sociological perspective. International Journal of Humanities and Education, 10(22), 151-180. https://doi.org/10.59304/ijhe.1477203
  • Arda, S. (2006). Predictors of parasocial interaction with the favorite and the least desirable characters portrayed in TV serials (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University.
  • Auter, P. J. (1992). TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 36(2), 173-181.
  • Brunetti, A. (2024). The role of AI in social relations and change. International Journal of Humanities and Education, 10(22), 151-180. https://doi.org/10.59304/ijhe.1477203
  • Byrne, D., & Nelson, D. (1965). Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(6), 659-663
  • Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2019). A review of AI adoptions in the media industry. International Journal on Media Management, 21(3-4), 193-215.
  • De-Lima-Santos, M. F., & Ceron, W. (2021). AI in news media: Current perceptions and future outlook. Journalism and Media, 3(1), 13-26.
  • Değirmenci, S. (2018). AI and news relationship: AI applications in digital media. Istanbul University Journal of Communication Faculty, 26, 18-22.
  • Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3), 279-305.
  • Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2020). AI and communication: A human-machine communication research agenda. New Media & Society, 22(1), 70-86.
  • Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of AI: On the past, present, and future of AI. California Management Review, 61(4), 5-14.
  • Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011). Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1104-1121.
  • Hoffner, C. (1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40(3), 389-403.
  • Keleş, A., Keleş, A., & Akçetin, E. (2017). The potential of using AI in marketing and intelligent decision support systems. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(11), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12022
  • Köroğlu, Y. (2017). Yapay zekânın teorik ve pratik sınırları. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Communication Monographs, 41(3), 261-266.
  • Mijwil, M. M. (2015, April). History of artificial intelligence. ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322234922_History_of_Artificial_Intelligence
  • Molin, V., & Nordgren, S. (2019). Robot or human? - The marketing phenomenon of virtual influencers: A case study about virtual influencers’ parasocial interaction on Instagram (Unpublished master’s thesis). Uppsala University Digital Archive.
  • Rezk, S. M. M. (2023). The role of AI in graphic design. Journal of Art, Design and Music, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.55554/2785-9649.1005
  • Rubin, R. B., & McHugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31(3), 279-292.
  • Rubin, A. M., & Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(4), 635-654.
  • Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2003). AI: A modern approach. Prentice Hall.
  • Schmid, H., & Klimmt, C. (2011). A magically nice guy: Parasocial relationships with Harry Potter across different cultures. International Communication Gazette, 73(3), 252-269.
  • Stock, R. M., & Merkle, M. (2018). Can humanoid service robots perform better than service employees? A comparison of innovative behavior cues. Journal of Service Management, 29(4), 597-620.
  • Tsay, M., & Bodine, B. M. (2012). Exploring parasocial interaction in college students as a multidimensional construct. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(3), 185-200.
  • Schramm, H., Liebers, N., Biniak, P., & Dettmar, J. (2024). Parasocial relationships in the digital age: Exploring emotional bonds with AI-driven media figures. Journal of Media Psychology, 36(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000324
  • Sucu, İ. (2019). The impact of AI on society and AI in the context of AI (A.I.) movie. International Journal of Textbooks and Educational Materials, 2(2), 203-215.
  • Yeniceler Kortak, İ. (2022). Looking at the relationship between AI and news from the user’s perspective: Analyzing the comments on robot news announcers on social media. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 32(1), 701-714. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1060917
  • Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2018). AI and the public sector-applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Communication Studies, New Communication Technologies, New Media
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Nihal Erdoğan Sepetci 0000-0002-4630-470X

Early Pub Date October 28, 2025
Publication Date October 30, 2025
Submission Date May 23, 2025
Acceptance Date September 26, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Issue: 16

Cite

APA Erdoğan Sepetci, N. (2025). Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory. Etkileşim(16), 284-306. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2025.8.16.314
AMA Erdoğan Sepetci N. Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory. Etkileşim. October 2025;(16):284-306. doi:10.32739/etkilesim.2025.8.16.314
Chicago Erdoğan Sepetci, Nihal. “Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory”. Etkileşim, no. 16 (October 2025): 284-306. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2025.8.16.314.
EndNote Erdoğan Sepetci N (October 1, 2025) Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory. Etkileşim 16 284–306.
IEEE N. Erdoğan Sepetci, “Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory”, Etkileşim, no. 16, pp. 284–306, October2025, doi: 10.32739/etkilesim.2025.8.16.314.
ISNAD Erdoğan Sepetci, Nihal. “Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory”. Etkileşim 16 (October2025), 284-306. https://doi.org/10.32739/etkilesim.2025.8.16.314.
JAMA Erdoğan Sepetci N. Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory. Etkileşim. 2025;:284–306.
MLA Erdoğan Sepetci, Nihal. “Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory”. Etkileşim, no. 16, 2025, pp. 284-06, doi:10.32739/etkilesim.2025.8.16.314.
Vancouver Erdoğan Sepetci N. Viewer Perceptions on AI-Supported Digital Newscasters: A Qualitative Analysis in the Context of Parasocial Interaction Theory. Etkileşim. 2025(16):284-306.

doaj-logo-colour.pngebsco-logo-color-scree.png