Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğretiminde Duolingo’ya Yönelik Öğrenci Görüşleri

Abstract

Bu çalışma, altı haftalık bir süre boyunca A1 ile C1 seviyeleri arasında Türkçeyi öğrenen öğrenciler için mobil destekli dil öğrenme (MALL) aracı olarak Duolingo’nun kullanımını incelemektedir. Çalışma, öğrencilerin Türkçeyi öğrenmek için Duolingo ile ilgili deneyimleri hakkında bilgi toplamayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın temel amacı, öğrencilerin geri bildirimlerine dayanarak Duolingo’nun yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenimini desteklemedeki etkinliğini değerlendirmek ve uygulamanın iyileştirilebileceği alanları belirlemektir. Veriler, rehberli bir Duolingo oturumunun ardından sınıf ortamında 117 Türkçe öğrencisiyle yarı yapılandırılmış bir form aracılığıyla toplanmıştır; görüşme formu bireysel olarak uygulanmış ve yanıtlar yazılı olarak alınmıştır. Görüşmeler, öğrencilerin Duolingo uygulamasını kullanma deneyimlerine odaklanmış ve uygulamanın kullanılabilirliği hakkındaki görüşleri ve iyileştirme önerileri de dâhil edilmiştir. Öğrenciler, kullanıcı dostu arayüzünü takdir ederek uygulamadan genel olarak memnun olduklarını ifade etmiştir. Ancak, daha fazla konuşma etkinliği ihtiyacı, Türkçe öğretimi için daha geniş dil seçenekleri yelpazesi, canlı veya yapay zeka tabanlı konuşma araçlarıyla entegrasyon gibi iyileştirilmesi gereken birkaç alan vurgulanmıştır. Bulgular, Duolingo’nun hem bireysel hem de sınıf temelli öğrenme için değerli bir araç olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak, konuşma odaklı etkinliklerin daha fazla dâhil edilmesi ve uygulamanın öğrenme deneyimini kişiselleştirme yeteneğinin geliştirilmesi, eğitim değerini önemli ölçüde artırabilir, daha dengeli ve kapsamlı bir dil öğrenme deneyimi sağlayabilir.

Keywords

• Duolingo
• mobil destekli dil öğrenimi
• öğrenci görüşleri
• yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretimi
• yapay zekâ

Students’ Perceptions of Duolingo in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language

Abstract

This study examines the use of Duolingo as a mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) tool for learners of Turkish, ranging from A1 to C1 proficiency levels, over a six-week period. The study aims to gather insights on students' experiences with Duolingo for Turkish language learning. The primary objective of the study is to assess the effectiveness of Duolingo in supporting the learning of Turkish as a foreign language, based on student feedback, and to identify areas where the app could be improved. Data was collected through a semi-structured form with 117 Turkish language learners conducted in classroom settings after a guided Duolingo session; the interview form was administered individually and responses were in written format. The interviews focused on students' experiences using the Duolingo app, including their opinions on its usability and suggestions for improvements. Students expressed overall satisfaction with the app, appreciating its user-friendly interface. However, they highlighted several areas for improvement, such as the need for more speaking activities, a broader range of language options for Turkish instruction, and integration with live or AI-based speaking tools. The findings suggest that Duolingo is a valuable tool for both individual and classroom-based learning. However, incorporating more speaking-focused activities and enhancing the app's ability to personalize the learning experience could significantly increase its educational value, providing a more balanced and comprehensive language learning experience.

Keywords

• Artificial intelligence
• Duolingo
• mobile-assisted language learning
• student perceptions
• teaching Turkish as a foreign language

References

1. Bañados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 533-550. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i3.533-550
2. Blake, R. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd ed.). Georgetown University Press
3. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (Sixth Edition). Routledge.
4. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları [Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches] (S. B. Demir, Trans.). Eğiten Kitap.
5. Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3-14). Routledge.
6. Dizon, G. (2017). Using intelligent personal assistants for second language learning: A case study of Alexa. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 811-830. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.353
7. Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
8. Georgiev, T., Georgieva, E., & Smrikarov, A. (2004). M-learning: a new stage of e-learning. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 1-7). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1050330.1050437

9. Gonulal, T. (2019). The use of Instagram as a mobile-assisted language learning tool. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(3), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.590108
10. Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
11. Haznedar, B. (2015). Türkiye’de yabancı dil öğretimi: İlköğretim yabancı dil programı [Foreign language teaching in Turkey: Primary education foreign language program]. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 21(2), 15–29.
12. Herlina, N., Sundayana, W., & Purnawarman, P. (2019, October). Blended learning as a means of promoting autonomous and collaborative learning experiences. In Third International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2019–Humanity, Education and Social Sciences (IcoSIHESS 2019) (pp. 76-82). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.12
13. Hoi, V. N., & Mu, G. M. (2021). Perceived teacher support and students’ acceptance of mobile‐assisted language learning: Evidence from Vietnamese higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 879-898. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13044
14. Huynh, D., Zuo, L., & Iida, H. (2016). Analyzing gamification of Duolingo with a focus on its course structure. In Games and Learning Alliance: 5th International Conference, GALA 2016, Utrecht, The Netherlands, December 5–7, 2016, Proceedings 5 (pp. 268-277). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50182-6_24
15. Kessler, M., Loewen, S., & Gönülal, T. (2023). Mobile-assisted language learning with Babbel and Duolingo: comparing L2 learning gains and user experience. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2215294
16. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (Eds.) (2005). Mobile Learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. Routledge.
17. Li, R. (2023). Effects of mobile-assisted language learning on EFL learners’ listening skill development. Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202304_26(2).0003
18. Li, Z., & Bonk, C. J. (2023). Self-directed language learning with Duolingo in an out-of-class context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(3), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2206874
19. Li, Z., Bonk, C. J., & Zhou, C. (2024). Supporting learners’ self-management for self-directed language learning: A study within Duolingo. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0093
20. Lim, C., Song, H. D., & Lee, Y. (2012). Improving the usability of the user interface for a digital textbook platform for elementary-school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9222-5
21. Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000065
22. Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285-329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125
23. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family practice, 13(6), 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
24. Munday, P. (2017). Duolingo. Gamified learning through translation. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 4(2), 194-198.https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2017.1396071
25. Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004). Context-aware support for computer-supported ubiquitous learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 27-34). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2004.1281330
26. Ritonga, M., Febriani, S. R., Kustati, M., Khaef, E., Ritonga, A. W., & Yasmar, R. (2022). Duolingo: An Arabic speaking skills’ learning platform for andragogy education. Education Research International, 2022(1), 7090752.
27. Rosman, P. (2008). M-learning as a paradigm of new forms in education. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 11(1), 119-125.
28. Shortt, M., Tilak, S., Kuznetcova, I., Martens, B., & Akinkuolie, B. (2023). Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 517-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1933540
29. Stanley, G. (2013). Language Learning with Technology: Ideas for Integrating Technology in the Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
30. Tiara, A. D., Rahman, M. A., & Handrianto, C. (2021). The students perception about use of duolingo application for improving english vocabulary. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others, 4(4), 690-701. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5775915
31. Tsai, C. C. (2016). The role of Duolingo on foreign language learners’ autonomous learning. In The Asian Conference of Language Learning 2016: Official Conference of Proceedings. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/acll2016/ACLL2016_26504.pdf
32. Walker, A., & White, G. (2013). Technology enhanced language learning. Oxford University Press.
33. Yang, S. J. H. (2006). Context aware ubiquitous learning environments for peer to peer collaborative learning. Educational Technology and Society, 9, 188-201.
34. Zainuddin, Z. (2024). Integrating ease of use and affordable gamification-based instruction into a remote learning environment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(5), 1261-1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09832-6
35. Zanjani, N. (2017). The important elements of LMS design that affect user engagement with e-learning tools within LMSs in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2938
36. Zhai, C., & Wibowo, S. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100134