Bu çalışmada, hava soğutmalı batarya paketinde farklı akış tasarımının ve saptırıcı plaka kullanımının termal performansa etkisi CFD yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, geleneksel tek girişli akış yapısına sahip olan Model A ile çift girişli ve saptırıcı plakalarının kullanıldığı Model B karşılaştırılmıştır. Her iki modelde de 24 adet 18650 tip lityum iyon batarya hücresi kullanılmış olup, batarya paketinin hava giriş ve çıkış yüzey alanları eşit olacak şekilde tasarlanmıştır. 3C ve 4C deşarj oranları için gerçekleştirilen analizler sonucunda, çift girişli akış yapısının ve saptırıcı plakaların batarya paketindeki soğutma etkinliğini belirgin biçimde artırdığı gözlemlenmiştir. 3C deşarj oranında, Model B ile elde edilen maksimum batarya sıcaklığının ve maksimum sıcaklık farkının Model B’ye kıyasla sırasıyla 1,87 K ve 1,08 K daha düşük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. 4C deşarj oranında ise bu iyileştirme daha da belirgin hale gelerek maksimum batarya sıcaklığı 2,49 K, maksimum sıcaklık farkı ise 1,44 K kadar azaltılmıştır. Sıcaklık kontürleri incelendiğinde, Model A’da özellikle arka bölgelerde sıcaklık birikimlerinin oluştuğu ve Model B’de daha homojen dağılım meydana geldiği gözlemlenmiştir.
Bu çalışma için etik kurul onayına gerek yoktur.
In this study, the effect of different flow designs and the use of deflector plates on the thermal performance of an air cooled battery pack was investigated using the CFD method. Model A, which has a conventional single inlet flow structures, was compared with Model B, which employs dual inlets and deflector plates. In both models, 24 cylindrical 18650 lithium-ion battery cells were used, and the inlet and outlet surface areas of the battery pack were designed to be equal. Analyses performed at 3C and 4C discharge rates showed that the dual inlet flow structure and deflector plates significantly improved the cooling efficiency of the battery pack. At a 3C discharge rate, the maximum battery temperature and maximum temperature difference obtained with Model B were 1.87 K and 1.08 K lower, respectively, compared to Model A. At a 4C discharge rate, this improvement became even more pronounced, with the maximum battery temperature reduced by 2.49 K and the maximum temperature difference decreased by 1.44 K. Examination of the temperature contours revealed that, in Model A, heat accumulation occurred particularly in the rear regions, whereas Model B achieved a more homogeneous temperature distribution.
Ethics committee approval is not required for this study.
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Mechanical Engineering (Other) |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | October 20, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | February 19, 2026 |
| Publication Date | April 10, 2026 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.1807247 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA85EN32PZ |
| Published in Issue | Year 2026 Volume: 31 Issue: 1 |
Announcements:
30.03.2021-Beginning with our April 2021 (26/1) issue, in accordance with the new criteria of TR-Dizin, the Declaration of Conflict of Interest and the Declaration of Author Contribution forms fulfilled and signed by all authors are required as well as the Copyright form during the initial submission of the manuscript. Furthermore two new sections, i.e. ‘Conflict of Interest’ and ‘Author Contribution’, should be added to the manuscript. Links of those forms that should be submitted with the initial manuscript can be found in our 'Author Guidelines' and 'Submission Procedure' pages. The manuscript template is also updated. For articles reviewed and accepted for publication in our 2021 and ongoing issues and for articles currently under review process, those forms should also be fulfilled, signed and uploaded to the system by authors.