PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD

Ulviye Polat; Filiz Gürtuna

doi:10.17482/uumfd.539203

Research Article

PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD

Year 2020, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 341 - 360, 30.04.2020

Ulviye Polat Filiz Gürtuna

https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.539203

Abstract

Environmental Management System (EMS) studies conducted today are activities where
enterprises plan, implement, control and monitor measures related to their activities that can impact the
environment, and systematically and sustainably carry out activities aimed at preserving the environment.
Given the limited resources of enterprises such as workforce, money, time, machinery and equipment, it is
important for enterprises to prioritize their activities so that EMS’s work effectively. In this study, a list of
environmental activities was primarily established with the aim of determining the EMS activities to be
undertaken by enterprises or evaluating existing environmental activities. An approach for determining
prioritized activities was developed from the created activity list according to the evaluation criteria
appropriate to the operating conditions of enterprises.

Keywords

Environmental Management System, E-FMEA, Fuzzy TOPSIS

References

1. Aung, T. S., Luan, S., Xu, Q. (2019) Application of multi-criteria decision approach for the analysis of medical waste management systems in Myanmar, Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.049
2. Amores-Salvado, J., Castro, G.M., Navas-López, J.E. (2015) The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: A firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 96, 288-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.004
3. Balana, B.B., Mathijs, E., Muys, B. (2010) Assessing the sustainability of forest management: An application of multi-criteria decision analysis to community forests in Northern Ethiopia, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1294-1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.005
4. Chung, C., Hsieh, Y., Lin, H.C. (2019) Fuzzy inference system for modeling the environmental risk map of air pollutants in Taiwan, Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 808-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.038
5. Daddi, T., Testa, F., Frey, M., Iraldo, F. (2016) Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness: An empirical study, Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 647-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.025
6. Darbra, R.M., Ronza, A., Stojanovic, T.A., Wooldridge, C., Casal, J. (2005) A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 866-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.04.037
7. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Rosario Ramos, M., Azeiteiro, M. (2012) Environmental Management Systems (EMS) implementation processes and practices in European higher education institutions-Top Down versus participatory approaches, Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.034
8. Erdas, C., Fokaides, P.A., Charalambous, C. (2015) Ecological footprint analysis based awareness creation for energy efficiency and climate change mitigation measures enhancing the environmental management yystem of Limassol Port, Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.087
9. Feng, T., Cai, D., Wang, D., Zhang, X. (2016) Environmental management systems and financial performance: the Joint effect of switching cost and competitive intensity, Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.038
10. Gonzalez-Benito, J., Gonzalez-Benito, O. (2005) The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices, International Journal of Production Research, 44, 1353-1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500435199
11. Guerrero-Baena, M.D., Gomez-Limon, J.A., Fruet, J.V. (2015) A multicriteria method for environmental management system selection: An intellectual capital approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 428-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.079
12. Interlenghi, S.F., Almeida Bruno, P., Queiroz Fernandes Araujo, O., Medeiros, J.L. (2017) Social and environmental impacts of replacing transesterification agent in soybean biodiesel production: Multi-criteria and principal component analyses, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.222
13. He, L., Shen, J., Zhang, Y. (2017) Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management, Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 1115-1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.059
14. Karaer, F., Pusat, T. (2002) ISO 14001 Çevre yönetim sistemi standardının otomotiv yan sanayiine uygulanması. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 11-20
15. Khalili, N.R. and Duecker, S. (2013) Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management system framework, Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 188-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.044
16. Kania, A., Roszak, M., Spilka, M. (2014) Evaluation of FMEA methods used in the environmental management, Materials Science and Engineering, 65, 37-44
17. Kanyimba, A.T., Richter, B.W., Raath, S.P. (2014) The effectiveness of an environmental management system in selected South African primary schools, Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 479-488.
18. Kokangül, A., Polat, U., Dağsuyu, C. (2018) A new approach for environmental risk assessment, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24, 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1364132
19. Ligus, M., Peternek, P. (2018) Determination of most suitable low-emission energy technologies development in Poland using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method, Energy Procedia, 153, 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.046
20. Lo, C.K.Y., Yeung, A.C.L., Cheng, T.C.E. (2012) The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries, Int. J. Production Economics, 135, 561-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.010
21. Marazza, D., Bandini, V., Contin, A. (2010) Ranking environmental aspects in environmental management systems: A new method tested on local authorities, Environment International, 36, 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.10.011
22. Martins, F.,Fonseca, L. (2018) Comparison between eco-management and audit scheme and ISO 14001:2015, Energy Procedia, 153, 450-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.023
23. Mazzi, A., Toniolo, S., Mason, M., Aguiari, F., Scipioni, A. (2016) What are the benefits and difficulties in adopting an environmental management system? The opinion of Italian organizations, Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 873-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.053
24. Mazzi, A., Toniolo, S., Catto, S., Lorenzi, V., Scipioni, A. (2017) The combination of an environmental management system and life cycle assessment at the territorial level, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 63, 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.004
25. Mohammed, M. (2000) The ISO 14001 EMS implementation process and its implications: A case study of Central Japan, Environmental Management, 25, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679910014
26. Oliveira, J.A., Oliveira, O.J., Ometto, A.R., Ferraudo, A.S., Salgado, M.H. (2016) Environmental management system ISO 14001 factors for promoting the adoption of cleaner production practices, Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 1384-1394. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.013
27. Orcos, R., Perez-Aradros, B., Blind, N. (2018) Why does the diffusion of environmental management standards differ across countries? The role of formal and informal institutions in the adoption of ISO 14001, Journal of World Business, 53, 850-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.07.002
28. Paksoy, T., Yapıcı Pehlivan, N., Özceylan, E. (2013) Bulanık Küme Teorisi, Nobel Yayınevi.
29. Phan, T.N. and Baird, K. (2015) The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems: The influence of institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance, Journal of Environmental Management, 160, 45-56. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.006
30. Roszak, M., Spilka, M., Kania, A. (2015) Environmental Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)–A new approach to methodology, Metalurgija, 54, 449-451
31. Silva, S. and Lopes, A.M. (2017) Enviromental aspects and impacts of a waste incineration plant, Energy Procedia, 136, 239-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.250
32. Qi, G.Y., Zeng, S.X., Tam, C.M., Yin, H.T., Wu, J.F., Dai, Z.H. (2011) Diffusion of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in China: Rethinking on stakeholders’ roles, Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1250-1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.006
33. Wagner, M. (2015) A European perspective on country moderation effects: Environmental management systems and sustainability-related human resource benefits, Journal of World Business, 50, 379-388. http://dx/doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jwb.2014.08.005
34. Treacy, R., Humphreys, P., McIvor, R., Lo, C. (2019) ISO 14001 certification and operating performance: A practice-based view, International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.012
35. Vavrek, R., Chovancova, J. (2019) Assessment of economic and environmental energy performance of EU countries using CV-TOPSIS technique, Ecological Indicators, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105519
36. Yan, C. and Yanli, Z. (2011) Analysis on the environmental effect of renewable energy consumption by rural residents in daily life in China-from the perspectives of carbon emissions, Energy Procedia, 5, 1642-1646. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.280
37. Zackrisson, M. (2003) Environmental aspects when manufacturing products mainly out of metals and/or polymers, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.09.014
38. Zeng, S.X., Tam, C.M., Tam, V.W. (2015) Integrating safety, environmental and quality risks for project management using a FMEA method, Engineering Economics, 66 (1), 44-52

Yeni Bir Çevre Yönetim Sistemi Aktiviteleri Grubunun Bulanık TOPSIS Metodu ile Önceliklendirilmesi

Year 2020, Volume: 25 Issue: 1, 341 - 360, 30.04.2020

Ulviye Polat Filiz Gürtuna

https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.539203

Abstract

Günümüzde yürütülen çevre yönetim sistemi (ÇMS) çalışmaları, işletmelerin çevreyi etkileyebilecek
faaliyetleriyle ilgili önlemlerini planladığı, uyguladığı, kontrol ettiği ve izlediği, sistemli ve sürdürülebilir
bir şekilde çevreyi korumaya yönelik faaliyetlerini gerçekleştirdikleri çalışmalardır. İşletmelerin iş gücü,
para, zaman, makine-ekipman gibi kısıtlı kaynakları göz önünde bulundurulduğunda çevre yönetim sistemi
çalışmalarını etkin yürütebilmek için hangi faaliyetlerin önceliklendirilmesi gerekliliği önemli olmaktadır.
Bu çalışmada öncelikli olarak, işletmelerin kuracakları çevre yönetim sistemi faaliyetlerini belirleme veya
mevcut çevresel faaliyetlerini gözden geçirme amacı ile bir çevresel faaliyet listesi oluşturulmuştur.
Oluşturulan faaliyet listesinden, işletme koşullarına uygun değerlendirme kriterlerine göre öncelikli
faaliyetlerin belirlenmesi konusunda bir yaklaşım geliştirilmiştir.

Keywords

Çevre Yönetim Sistemi, E-FMEA, Bulanık TOPSIS

References

1. Aung, T. S., Luan, S., Xu, Q. (2019) Application of multi-criteria decision approach for the analysis of medical waste management systems in Myanmar, Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.049
2. Amores-Salvado, J., Castro, G.M., Navas-López, J.E. (2015) The importance of the complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental innovation capabilities: A firm level approach to environmental and business performance benefits, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 96, 288-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.004
3. Balana, B.B., Mathijs, E., Muys, B. (2010) Assessing the sustainability of forest management: An application of multi-criteria decision analysis to community forests in Northern Ethiopia, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1294-1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.005
4. Chung, C., Hsieh, Y., Lin, H.C. (2019) Fuzzy inference system for modeling the environmental risk map of air pollutants in Taiwan, Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 808-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.038
5. Daddi, T., Testa, F., Frey, M., Iraldo, F. (2016) Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness: An empirical study, Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 647-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.025
6. Darbra, R.M., Ronza, A., Stojanovic, T.A., Wooldridge, C., Casal, J. (2005) A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 866-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.04.037
7. Disterheft, A., Caeiro, S., Rosario Ramos, M., Azeiteiro, M. (2012) Environmental Management Systems (EMS) implementation processes and practices in European higher education institutions-Top Down versus participatory approaches, Journal of Cleaner Production, 31, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.034
8. Erdas, C., Fokaides, P.A., Charalambous, C. (2015) Ecological footprint analysis based awareness creation for energy efficiency and climate change mitigation measures enhancing the environmental management yystem of Limassol Port, Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.087
9. Feng, T., Cai, D., Wang, D., Zhang, X. (2016) Environmental management systems and financial performance: the Joint effect of switching cost and competitive intensity, Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 781-791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.038
10. Gonzalez-Benito, J., Gonzalez-Benito, O. (2005) The role of stakeholder pressure and managerial values in the implementation of environmental logistics practices, International Journal of Production Research, 44, 1353-1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500435199
11. Guerrero-Baena, M.D., Gomez-Limon, J.A., Fruet, J.V. (2015) A multicriteria method for environmental management system selection: An intellectual capital approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 428-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.079
12. Interlenghi, S.F., Almeida Bruno, P., Queiroz Fernandes Araujo, O., Medeiros, J.L. (2017) Social and environmental impacts of replacing transesterification agent in soybean biodiesel production: Multi-criteria and principal component analyses, Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.222
13. He, L., Shen, J., Zhang, Y. (2017) Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management, Journal of Environmental Management, 206, 1115-1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.059
14. Karaer, F., Pusat, T. (2002) ISO 14001 Çevre yönetim sistemi standardının otomotiv yan sanayiine uygulanması. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 11-20
15. Khalili, N.R. and Duecker, S. (2013) Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management system framework, Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 188-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.044
16. Kania, A., Roszak, M., Spilka, M. (2014) Evaluation of FMEA methods used in the environmental management, Materials Science and Engineering, 65, 37-44
17. Kanyimba, A.T., Richter, B.W., Raath, S.P. (2014) The effectiveness of an environmental management system in selected South African primary schools, Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 479-488.
18. Kokangül, A., Polat, U., Dağsuyu, C. (2018) A new approach for environmental risk assessment, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24, 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2017.1364132
19. Ligus, M., Peternek, P. (2018) Determination of most suitable low-emission energy technologies development in Poland using integrated fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method, Energy Procedia, 153, 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.046
20. Lo, C.K.Y., Yeung, A.C.L., Cheng, T.C.E. (2012) The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries, Int. J. Production Economics, 135, 561-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.010
21. Marazza, D., Bandini, V., Contin, A. (2010) Ranking environmental aspects in environmental management systems: A new method tested on local authorities, Environment International, 36, 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.10.011
22. Martins, F.,Fonseca, L. (2018) Comparison between eco-management and audit scheme and ISO 14001:2015, Energy Procedia, 153, 450-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.023
23. Mazzi, A., Toniolo, S., Mason, M., Aguiari, F., Scipioni, A. (2016) What are the benefits and difficulties in adopting an environmental management system? The opinion of Italian organizations, Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 873-885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.053
24. Mazzi, A., Toniolo, S., Catto, S., Lorenzi, V., Scipioni, A. (2017) The combination of an environmental management system and life cycle assessment at the territorial level, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 63, 59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.004
25. Mohammed, M. (2000) The ISO 14001 EMS implementation process and its implications: A case study of Central Japan, Environmental Management, 25, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002679910014
26. Oliveira, J.A., Oliveira, O.J., Ometto, A.R., Ferraudo, A.S., Salgado, M.H. (2016) Environmental management system ISO 14001 factors for promoting the adoption of cleaner production practices, Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 1384-1394. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.013
27. Orcos, R., Perez-Aradros, B., Blind, N. (2018) Why does the diffusion of environmental management standards differ across countries? The role of formal and informal institutions in the adoption of ISO 14001, Journal of World Business, 53, 850-861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.07.002
28. Paksoy, T., Yapıcı Pehlivan, N., Özceylan, E. (2013) Bulanık Küme Teorisi, Nobel Yayınevi.
29. Phan, T.N. and Baird, K. (2015) The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems: The influence of institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance, Journal of Environmental Management, 160, 45-56. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.006
30. Roszak, M., Spilka, M., Kania, A. (2015) Environmental Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)–A new approach to methodology, Metalurgija, 54, 449-451
31. Silva, S. and Lopes, A.M. (2017) Enviromental aspects and impacts of a waste incineration plant, Energy Procedia, 136, 239-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.10.250
32. Qi, G.Y., Zeng, S.X., Tam, C.M., Yin, H.T., Wu, J.F., Dai, Z.H. (2011) Diffusion of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in China: Rethinking on stakeholders’ roles, Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1250-1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.006
33. Wagner, M. (2015) A European perspective on country moderation effects: Environmental management systems and sustainability-related human resource benefits, Journal of World Business, 50, 379-388. http://dx/doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jwb.2014.08.005
34. Treacy, R., Humphreys, P., McIvor, R., Lo, C. (2019) ISO 14001 certification and operating performance: A practice-based view, International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.12.012
35. Vavrek, R., Chovancova, J. (2019) Assessment of economic and environmental energy performance of EU countries using CV-TOPSIS technique, Ecological Indicators, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105519
36. Yan, C. and Yanli, Z. (2011) Analysis on the environmental effect of renewable energy consumption by rural residents in daily life in China-from the perspectives of carbon emissions, Energy Procedia, 5, 1642-1646. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.280
37. Zackrisson, M. (2003) Environmental aspects when manufacturing products mainly out of metals and/or polymers, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.09.014
38. Zeng, S.X., Tam, C.M., Tam, V.W. (2015) Integrating safety, environmental and quality risks for project management using a FMEA method, Engineering Economics, 66 (1), 44-52

There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	English
Subjects	Industrial Engineering
Journal Section	Research Articles
Authors	Ulviye Polat 0000-0002-0199-9237 Filiz Gürtuna This is me 0000-0003-0116-4587
Publication Date	April 30, 2020
Submission Date	March 13, 2019
Acceptance Date	March 6, 2020
Published in Issue	Year 2020 Volume: 25 Issue: 1

Cite

APA	Polat, U., & Gürtuna, F. (2020). PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 341-360. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.539203
AMA	Polat U, Gürtuna F. PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD. UUJFE. April 2020;25(1):341-360. doi:10.17482/uumfd.539203
Chicago	Polat, Ulviye, and Filiz Gürtuna. “PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 25, no. 1 (April 2020): 341-60. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.539203.
EndNote	Polat U, Gürtuna F (April 1, 2020) PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 25 1 341–360.
IEEE	U. Polat and F. Gürtuna, “PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD”, UUJFE, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 341–360, 2020, doi: 10.17482/uumfd.539203.
ISNAD	Polat, Ulviye - Gürtuna, Filiz. “PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi 25/1 (April 2020), 341-360. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.539203.
JAMA	Polat U, Gürtuna F. PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD. UUJFE. 2020;25:341–360.
MLA	Polat, Ulviye and Filiz Gürtuna. “PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD”. Uludağ Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020, pp. 341-60, doi:10.17482/uumfd.539203.
Vancouver	Polat U, Gürtuna F. PRIORITIZING A NEW SET OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACTIVITIES WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD. UUJFE. 2020;25(1):341-60.

Article Files

Full Text

Announcements:

30.03.2021-Beginning with our April 2021 (26/1) issue, in accordance with the new criteria of TR-Dizin, the Declaration of Conflict of Interest and the Declaration of Author Contribution forms fulfilled and signed by all authors are required as well as the Copyright form during the initial submission of the manuscript. Furthermore two new sections, i.e. ‘Conflict of Interest’ and ‘Author Contribution’, should be added to the manuscript. Links of those forms that should be submitted with the initial manuscript can be found in our 'Author Guidelines' and 'Submission Procedure' pages. The manuscript template is also updated. For articles reviewed and accepted for publication in our 2021 and ongoing issues and for articles currently under review process, those forms should also be fulfilled, signed and uploaded to the system by authors.