Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2018, , 1 - 11, 10.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.30706/uybd.433735

Abstract

Yapı kalitesi araştırmalarında;
beton kalitesi, donatı ve korozyon durumu belirlenmeye  çalışılmaktadır. Bu amaçla, gerek tahribatlı
gerekse de tahribatsız bir takım uygulamalar yapılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bir
köprü yapısının elemanı olarak üretilen düşey bir betonarme yapısında gerçekleştirilmiş
jeofizik yöntemlerin uygulama örnekleri verilmektedir. Enine ve boyuna
donatılara sahip bu yapı üzerinde beton kalitesi, kırık, çatlak, donatı, çelik
hasır ve korozyon durumu araştırmaları yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, ultrasonik
yöntem, 2.7 GHz merkez frekanslı yer radarı yöntemi ve Wenner dizilimi ile
elektrik özdirenç yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Alınan ölçülerin değerlendirilmesi
sonucu, yapıya herhangi bir zarar vermeden uygulanan jeofizik yöntemlerle,
hızlı ve ucuz bir şekilde, betonarme bir yapının beton kalitesi, kırık-çatlak,
donatı, çelik hasır ve korozyon durumu tespitinin başarı ile yapılabildiği
anlaşılmıştır.

References

  • KAYNAKLAR
  • Annan, A.P., 2001. Ground Penetrating Radar Workshop Notes. Mississauga, OntarioSensorsand Software Inc.
  • Akevren S., 2010. Non-destructive examination of stone masonry historic structures quantitative IR thermographyand ultrasonic testing. MSc Dissertation, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Barroso E, Silva L, Polivanov H., 2006. Weathering and deterioration evaluation of a Brazilian cultural heritage buildin, IAEG
  • Cecire A.S., 2003. Nondestructive evaluation of historic structures. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCheilakou E,Theodorakeas P, Koui M, Moustakidis S ve Zeris C., 2013. Determination of Reinforcement and Tendon Ducts Positions on Pre-Stressed Concrete Bridges by Means of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), 5th International Conference on NDT of HSNT- IC MINDT 2013, Athens, Greece, art. no P.10.5, CD ROM.
  • Davis J.L. ve Annan A.P., 1986. High Resolution Sounding Using Ground Penetrating Radar, Geoscience, 13, 3, 205-208
  • Diana G, Fais S., 2010. IR thermography and ultrasonic investigations in thecultural heritagefield. In: 15th international conference on ‘‘cultura lheritage and new technologies’’, Vienna
  • Golden Software Surfer 2002. User’s guide: contouringand 3D surface mapping forscientist and engineers. Colorado, USA
  • Gosa´lbez J, Salazar A, Bosch I, Miralles R, Vergara L 2006. Application of ultrasonic nondestructive testing to the diagnosis of consolidation of a restored dome. Mater Eval 64(5):492–497
  • Hannachi S ve Guetteche MN 2012. Application of the Combined Method for Evaluating the Compressive Strength of Concrete on Site, Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 16-21
  • Tareco H, Grangeia C, Varum H, and Senos Matias M 2009. A high resolution GPR experiment to characterize the internal structure of a damaged adobe Wall, first break 27, 79-84.
  • Jones R and Gatfield EN, 1955. Testing concrate by an ultrasonic pulse tech. Paper No.34, London
  • Lemoni E, Christaras B 1999. Classification of soils for urban planning, using in situ ultrasonic velocity techniques, geotechnical engineering fortran sportation in frastructure. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 393–399
  • Martı´nez-Martı´neza J, Benevento D, Garcı´a-del-Curaa MA 2011. Spatial attenuation: themo stsensitive ultrasonic parameter for detecting petrographic feature sand decay processes in carbonate rocks, Eng Geol 9:84–95
  • Mechbal Z, Khamlichi A 2017. Determination of concrete rebars characteristics by enhanced post-processing of GPR scan raw data, NDT E Int., 89, 30–39
  • Nuzzo L, Calia A, Liberatore D, Masini N, Rizzo E, 2010. Integration of ground-penetrating radar, ultrasonic test sand infrared thermography for the analysis of a precious medieval rosewindow. Adv Geosci 24:69–82 Özçelik, E 2017. Beton ve Betonarme Yapıların Yapı Kalitesinin Jeofizik Yöntemlerle Araştırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon
  • Popovics JS 2003. NDE Techniques for concrete and masonry structures, Prog Struct Eng Mater 5:49–59
  • Proceq Resipod Family, 2013. Operating Instructions Concrete Durability Testing
  • Siedel H, Siegesmund S 2011. Characterization of stone deterioration on buildings. In: Siegesmund S, Snethlage R (eds) Stone in architecture: properties, durability, 4th edn. Springer, New York, pp 347–410Siegesmund S, Du¨rrast H 2011. Physical and mechanical properties of rocks. In: Siegesmund S, Snethlage R (eds) Stone in architecture: properties, durability, 4th edn. Springer, New York, pp 97–225Solla M; Asorey-Cacheda R; Núñez-Nieto X; Conde-Carnero B 2016. Evaluation of historical bridges through recreation of GPR models with the FDTD algorithm. NDT E Int. 77, 19–27
  • Telford WM, Geldart LP ve Sheriff RE 1990. Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press. 770 p
  • Uyanık O, Kaptan K, Gülay FG ve Tezcan S 2011. Beton Dayanımının Tahribatsız Ultrasonik Yöntemle Tayini, Yapı Dünyası 184, 55-58
  • Uyanık O, Gülay FG ve Tezcan S 2012. Beton Dayanımının Tahribatsız Ultrasonik Yöntemle Tayini, Hazır Beton CV 436f, 82-85
  • Whitehurst EA 1951. Soniscope Test Concrete Structures, Journal of American Concrete Institute, Proceeding, 47, pp, 443-444.
Year 2018, , 1 - 11, 10.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.30706/uybd.433735

Abstract

References

  • KAYNAKLAR
  • Annan, A.P., 2001. Ground Penetrating Radar Workshop Notes. Mississauga, OntarioSensorsand Software Inc.
  • Akevren S., 2010. Non-destructive examination of stone masonry historic structures quantitative IR thermographyand ultrasonic testing. MSc Dissertation, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Barroso E, Silva L, Polivanov H., 2006. Weathering and deterioration evaluation of a Brazilian cultural heritage buildin, IAEG
  • Cecire A.S., 2003. Nondestructive evaluation of historic structures. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCheilakou E,Theodorakeas P, Koui M, Moustakidis S ve Zeris C., 2013. Determination of Reinforcement and Tendon Ducts Positions on Pre-Stressed Concrete Bridges by Means of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), 5th International Conference on NDT of HSNT- IC MINDT 2013, Athens, Greece, art. no P.10.5, CD ROM.
  • Davis J.L. ve Annan A.P., 1986. High Resolution Sounding Using Ground Penetrating Radar, Geoscience, 13, 3, 205-208
  • Diana G, Fais S., 2010. IR thermography and ultrasonic investigations in thecultural heritagefield. In: 15th international conference on ‘‘cultura lheritage and new technologies’’, Vienna
  • Golden Software Surfer 2002. User’s guide: contouringand 3D surface mapping forscientist and engineers. Colorado, USA
  • Gosa´lbez J, Salazar A, Bosch I, Miralles R, Vergara L 2006. Application of ultrasonic nondestructive testing to the diagnosis of consolidation of a restored dome. Mater Eval 64(5):492–497
  • Hannachi S ve Guetteche MN 2012. Application of the Combined Method for Evaluating the Compressive Strength of Concrete on Site, Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 16-21
  • Tareco H, Grangeia C, Varum H, and Senos Matias M 2009. A high resolution GPR experiment to characterize the internal structure of a damaged adobe Wall, first break 27, 79-84.
  • Jones R and Gatfield EN, 1955. Testing concrate by an ultrasonic pulse tech. Paper No.34, London
  • Lemoni E, Christaras B 1999. Classification of soils for urban planning, using in situ ultrasonic velocity techniques, geotechnical engineering fortran sportation in frastructure. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 393–399
  • Martı´nez-Martı´neza J, Benevento D, Garcı´a-del-Curaa MA 2011. Spatial attenuation: themo stsensitive ultrasonic parameter for detecting petrographic feature sand decay processes in carbonate rocks, Eng Geol 9:84–95
  • Mechbal Z, Khamlichi A 2017. Determination of concrete rebars characteristics by enhanced post-processing of GPR scan raw data, NDT E Int., 89, 30–39
  • Nuzzo L, Calia A, Liberatore D, Masini N, Rizzo E, 2010. Integration of ground-penetrating radar, ultrasonic test sand infrared thermography for the analysis of a precious medieval rosewindow. Adv Geosci 24:69–82 Özçelik, E 2017. Beton ve Betonarme Yapıların Yapı Kalitesinin Jeofizik Yöntemlerle Araştırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon
  • Popovics JS 2003. NDE Techniques for concrete and masonry structures, Prog Struct Eng Mater 5:49–59
  • Proceq Resipod Family, 2013. Operating Instructions Concrete Durability Testing
  • Siedel H, Siegesmund S 2011. Characterization of stone deterioration on buildings. In: Siegesmund S, Snethlage R (eds) Stone in architecture: properties, durability, 4th edn. Springer, New York, pp 347–410Siegesmund S, Du¨rrast H 2011. Physical and mechanical properties of rocks. In: Siegesmund S, Snethlage R (eds) Stone in architecture: properties, durability, 4th edn. Springer, New York, pp 97–225Solla M; Asorey-Cacheda R; Núñez-Nieto X; Conde-Carnero B 2016. Evaluation of historical bridges through recreation of GPR models with the FDTD algorithm. NDT E Int. 77, 19–27
  • Telford WM, Geldart LP ve Sheriff RE 1990. Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press. 770 p
  • Uyanık O, Kaptan K, Gülay FG ve Tezcan S 2011. Beton Dayanımının Tahribatsız Ultrasonik Yöntemle Tayini, Yapı Dünyası 184, 55-58
  • Uyanık O, Gülay FG ve Tezcan S 2012. Beton Dayanımının Tahribatsız Ultrasonik Yöntemle Tayini, Hazır Beton CV 436f, 82-85
  • Whitehurst EA 1951. Soniscope Test Concrete Structures, Journal of American Concrete Institute, Proceeding, 47, pp, 443-444.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Geological Sciences and Engineering (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Emre Özçelik

Kenan Gelişli

Publication Date July 10, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

APA Özçelik, E., & Gelişli, K. (2018). BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI. Uygulamalı Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 17(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30706/uybd.433735
AMA Özçelik E, Gelişli K. BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI. uybd. June 2018;17(1):1-11. doi:10.30706/uybd.433735
Chicago Özçelik, Emre, and Kenan Gelişli. “BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI”. Uygulamalı Yerbilimleri Dergisi 17, no. 1 (June 2018): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30706/uybd.433735.
EndNote Özçelik E, Gelişli K (June 1, 2018) BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI. Uygulamalı Yerbilimleri Dergisi 17 1 1–11.
IEEE E. Özçelik and K. Gelişli, “BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI”, uybd, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018, doi: 10.30706/uybd.433735.
ISNAD Özçelik, Emre - Gelişli, Kenan. “BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI”. Uygulamalı Yerbilimleri Dergisi 17/1 (June 2018), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30706/uybd.433735.
JAMA Özçelik E, Gelişli K. BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI. uybd. 2018;17:1–11.
MLA Özçelik, Emre and Kenan Gelişli. “BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI”. Uygulamalı Yerbilimleri Dergisi, vol. 17, no. 1, 2018, pp. 1-11, doi:10.30706/uybd.433735.
Vancouver Özçelik E, Gelişli K. BETONARME YAPILARDA JEOFİZİK YÖNTEMLERLE BETON KALİTESİ VE YAPI DONATI DURUMUNUN ARAŞTIRILMASI. uybd. 2018;17(1):1-11.