Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

BOUNDARIES OF BORDER TRADE IN ECONOMIC POLICY

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 18, 305 - 319
https://doi.org/10.54831/vanyyuiibfd.1579334

Öz

This study aims to examine (cross-) border trade which is a necessity and a reality of global trade within economic policy. When the government wants to increase or decrease the border trade, it makes necessary legal arrangements and applies various economic policies. These implementations are within the scope of bilateral border trade agreements between countries and the borders established by international institutions. The inhabitants of the settlements close to the border gates and enterprises are parties to the border trade and try to increase their income through this trade. The importance of border trade in terms of economic policy has two dimensions: i-Economic policy aims at economic growth, low inflation and unemployment, fair income distribution, balance of payments, the fight against the black market, etc. ii-It should be determined which kind of economic policy instruments these objectives will be achieved. According to the capitalist order, although the decision-making body is accepted as a market in the solution of macro problems, in practice it is fixed with the experience that the state will be effective with various legal-political documents. Therefore. the means of economic control in the evolution of border trade spontaneously and necessarily outweigh rather than the monetary, financial, etc. policies.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, J. E. and Eric van, W. (2001). Borders, Trade and Welfare. NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research) Working Paper 8515, October.
  • Aung, W. S. (2009). The Role of Informal Cross-border Trade in Myanmar. Institute for Security and Development Policy, Sweden.
  • Duffield, MR. (2000). Globalisation, Transborder Trade and War Economies. In M. Berdal, & D. Malone (Eds.), Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (pp. 69 - 89). Lynne Rienner.
  • Duval, Y., Utoktham, C. (2009). Behind the border trade facilitation in Asia-Pacific: Cost of trade, credit information, contract enforcement and regulatory coherence. ARTNeT Working Paper Series, No. 67, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), Bangkok.
  • Hanson, G H. and Antonio, S. (2001). Political Economy, Sectoral Shocks, and Border Enforcement. The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies CCIS Working Paper 44 (University of California), Nov.
  • Hoekman, B. Aaditya, M. and Andr´e, S. (2007). The political economy of services trade liberalization: a case for international regulatory cooperation?, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vo. 23, No 3, 367–391.
  • Kim, K. and Mariano, P. (2020). Trade Impact of Reducing Time and Costs at Borders in the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Region. ADBI Working Paper 1106. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
  • Kusakabe, K. (2010). Impact of Promoting Border Trade Among GMS Countries on the Well-Being of Local People. AIT-Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.
  • Lesser, C. and Evdokia M.L. (2009). Informal Cross-Border Trade and Trade Facilitation Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, No. 86.
  • Molthe, R. (2024). Border Trade a Mixed Blessing. NHH Norwegian School of Economics, Jan. 25.
  • OECD (2008). Applying VAT/GST to Cross-Border Trade in Services and Intangibles Emerging Concepts for Defining Place of Taxation. Invitation for comments, Committee on Fiscal Affairs Working Party No 9 on Consumption Taxes, OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration.
  • OECD (2009). Overcoming Border Bottlenecks: The Costs and Benefits of Trade Facilitation. Trade Policy Studies, OECD Pub. Paris.
  • Okazaki, Y. (2018). Doing Business and its Customs-related issues: A study on the Trading across Borders indicators, WCO Research Paper No. 44, World Customs Organization.
  • Orhan, O. Z. (2000). Sınır Ticaretinin Türkiye Ekonomisine Etkileri. İstanbul: İTO Yayını (No: 2000-27).
  • Sally, R. (2009). Globalisation and the Political Economy of Trade Liberalisation in the BRIICS. OECD. Doi:10.1787/9789264044814-6-en
  • Sally, R. (2008). The Political Economy of Trade Policy Reform: Lessons from Developing Countries. The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy 2 (2), Winter, 55-96.
  • Savaş, V. F. (1994). Politik İktisat. 2.b., İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Titeca, K. (2009). The Changing Cross-border Trade Dynamics between North-Western Uganda, North-Eastern Congo and Southern Sudan. Crisis States Research Centre, Working Paper no. 63 - Cities and Fragile States -, Nov.
  • WCO-WTO (2022). The Role of Advanced Technologies in Cross-Border Trade: A Customs Perspective..https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/wcotech22_e.pdf
  • WTO (2024). Digital technologies and trade: Trade facilitation. https://www.wto.org/english/ tratop_e/dtt_e/dtt-tradfa_e.htm

EKONOMİ POLİTİKASINDA SINIR TİCARETİNİN SINIRLARI

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 18, 305 - 319
https://doi.org/10.54831/vanyyuiibfd.1579334

Öz

Bu çalışma, küresel ticaretin bir gereği ve gerçeği olan sınır ticaretini iktisat politikasının çerçevesi içinde ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Devlet sınır ticaretini arttırmak ya da azaltmak istediğinde gerekli yasal düzenlemeleri yapar ve çeşitli iktisat politikalarını uygular. Bu uygulamalar, uluslararası kurumların belirlediği sınırlar ile ülkeler arasındaki ikili sınır ticareti anlaşmaları kapsamında olur. Sınır kapılarına yakın yerleşim yerlerinin sakinleri ve işletmeler ise sınır ticaretinin tarafları olup bu ticaret sayesinde gelirlerini arttırmaya çalışırlar. Sınır ticaretinin iktisat politikası açısından önemi ise iki boyutludur: i-İktisat politikası ile ekonomik büyüme, düşük enflasyon ve işsizlik, hakça gelir bölüşümü, ödemeler dengesi, karaborsa ile mücadele, vb. amaçlanır. ii-Bu amaçlara hangi tür iktisat politikası araçları ile ulaşılacağı belirlenmelidir. Kapitalist düzene göre makro sorunların çözümünde karar organı piyasa olarak kabul edilse de uygulamada devletin çeşitli yasal ve politik belge ile etkili olacağı tecrübelerle sabittir. Bundan dolayı sınır ticaretinin gelişiminde iktisadi kontrol araçları kendiliğinden ve zorunlu olarak parasal, mali, vb. politikalardan daha ağır basmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, J. E. and Eric van, W. (2001). Borders, Trade and Welfare. NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research) Working Paper 8515, October.
  • Aung, W. S. (2009). The Role of Informal Cross-border Trade in Myanmar. Institute for Security and Development Policy, Sweden.
  • Duffield, MR. (2000). Globalisation, Transborder Trade and War Economies. In M. Berdal, & D. Malone (Eds.), Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (pp. 69 - 89). Lynne Rienner.
  • Duval, Y., Utoktham, C. (2009). Behind the border trade facilitation in Asia-Pacific: Cost of trade, credit information, contract enforcement and regulatory coherence. ARTNeT Working Paper Series, No. 67, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), Bangkok.
  • Hanson, G H. and Antonio, S. (2001). Political Economy, Sectoral Shocks, and Border Enforcement. The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies CCIS Working Paper 44 (University of California), Nov.
  • Hoekman, B. Aaditya, M. and Andr´e, S. (2007). The political economy of services trade liberalization: a case for international regulatory cooperation?, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vo. 23, No 3, 367–391.
  • Kim, K. and Mariano, P. (2020). Trade Impact of Reducing Time and Costs at Borders in the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Region. ADBI Working Paper 1106. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.
  • Kusakabe, K. (2010). Impact of Promoting Border Trade Among GMS Countries on the Well-Being of Local People. AIT-Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.
  • Lesser, C. and Evdokia M.L. (2009). Informal Cross-Border Trade and Trade Facilitation Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. OECD Trade Policy Working Papers, No. 86.
  • Molthe, R. (2024). Border Trade a Mixed Blessing. NHH Norwegian School of Economics, Jan. 25.
  • OECD (2008). Applying VAT/GST to Cross-Border Trade in Services and Intangibles Emerging Concepts for Defining Place of Taxation. Invitation for comments, Committee on Fiscal Affairs Working Party No 9 on Consumption Taxes, OECD Centre for Tax Policy and Administration.
  • OECD (2009). Overcoming Border Bottlenecks: The Costs and Benefits of Trade Facilitation. Trade Policy Studies, OECD Pub. Paris.
  • Okazaki, Y. (2018). Doing Business and its Customs-related issues: A study on the Trading across Borders indicators, WCO Research Paper No. 44, World Customs Organization.
  • Orhan, O. Z. (2000). Sınır Ticaretinin Türkiye Ekonomisine Etkileri. İstanbul: İTO Yayını (No: 2000-27).
  • Sally, R. (2009). Globalisation and the Political Economy of Trade Liberalisation in the BRIICS. OECD. Doi:10.1787/9789264044814-6-en
  • Sally, R. (2008). The Political Economy of Trade Policy Reform: Lessons from Developing Countries. The Journal of International Trade and Diplomacy 2 (2), Winter, 55-96.
  • Savaş, V. F. (1994). Politik İktisat. 2.b., İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Titeca, K. (2009). The Changing Cross-border Trade Dynamics between North-Western Uganda, North-Eastern Congo and Southern Sudan. Crisis States Research Centre, Working Paper no. 63 - Cities and Fragile States -, Nov.
  • WCO-WTO (2022). The Role of Advanced Technologies in Cross-Border Trade: A Customs Perspective..https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/wcotech22_e.pdf
  • WTO (2024). Digital technologies and trade: Trade facilitation. https://www.wto.org/english/ tratop_e/dtt_e/dtt-tradfa_e.htm
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Maliye Politikası, Gelişme Ekonomisi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

İrfan Kalaycı 0000-0002-9323-8944

Mehmet Kaya 0000-0002-9495-4141

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 11 Aralık 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Gönderilme Tarihi 4 Kasım 2024
Kabul Tarihi 26 Kasım 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 18

Kaynak Göster

APA Kalaycı, İ., & Kaya, M. (2024). BOUNDARIES OF BORDER TRADE IN ECONOMIC POLICY. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(18), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.54831/vanyyuiibfd.1579334