Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province with Data Envelopment Analysis

Year 2024, , 112 - 123, 30.08.2024
https://doi.org/10.17094/vetsci.1455906

Abstract

This study was performed to determine the economic activity and profitability of veterinary practices operating in Kars province by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In this study, the 2023 data of 53.6% of veterinary practices operating in Kars province were obtained through a face-to-face survey. In the DEA applied to determine the economic efficiency of practices, input-oriented constant returns to scale (CCR) technique were used According to the study findings, 6.7% of the veterinarians participating in the survey were female, 93.3% were male, and 46.6% were aged between 25 and 29 years. It was observed that all the veterinarians participating in the research had been practicing their professional activities since the date of graduation, and the majority (73.3%) had 3-12 years of experience (graduate date 2011-2020). It was determined that 10% of the veterinarians participating in the survey received postgraduate education (master's degree with thesis and PhD). It was found that 30% of veterinarians opened a practice after working in a practice. According to the DEA results for economic efficiency, it was determined that 90% of the practices were active. As a result, when veterinary practices were evaluated in terms of efficiency, it was understood that rent, maintenance-repair, general administrative costs, and other costs must be reduced in order to make economically ineffective veterinary practices to effective.

References

  • 1. Smithcors JF. Medicine and civilization. CR. 1957;1(3): 286-302.
  • 2. Bekman M. Veteriner tarihi. Ankara Basım ve Ciltevi. Ankara; 1940.
  • 3. Armutak A. The establishment and development of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Istanbul during its first 10 years (1972-1982). DOAJ. 2002;28(2):429-445.
  • 4. Öztürk R. Historical developments in veterinary pharmaceutical industry in Turkey. Eurasian J Vet Sci. 2002; 18(3-4):45-50.
  • 5. Council of Higher Education (COHE). All universities with programs. Accessed January 3, 2024. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10232.
  • 6. Demir P, Aydın E. Veteriner hekimlikte klinik işletmeciliği ve yönetimi. In: Demir P, Aydın E. Akademisyen kitabevi. Ankara: 2021.
  • 7. Cevizci S, Erginöz E. Relationship between human health and veterinary practices: "Veterinary public health". J Fac Vet Med Istanbul Univ. 2008; 34(2): 49-62.
  • 8. Özgür A. A historical study on the term of veterinary medicine. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 1997; 44:1-8.
  • 9. Kieves NR, Roark AW, Sparks TK. Business education in veterinary schools: The potential role of the Veterinary Business Management Association. JVME. 2007;34(5):678-682.
  • 10. Can MF. Factors influencing entrepreneurship level and intention of veterinarians in Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2015;21(6):855-862.
  • 11. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429-444.
  • 12. Aydin E, Yeşilyurt C, Sakarya E. Measuring the performance of cattle fattening enterprises with data envelopment analysis: Comparative analysis of enterprises in the Northeast Anatolia Region (TRA) between the years 2009-2010. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2014;20(5):719-725.
  • 13. Demir P, Derbentli O, Sakarya E. Measurement the efficiency of dairies in the Kars province with data envelopment analysis. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2012;18(2):169-176.
  • 14. Olariu GV, Brad S. Efficiency assessment of universities with DEA method based on public data. BRCEBE. 2017;2(1):106-114.
  • 15. Sarıözkan S, Akçay A, Küçükoflaz M, et al. Productivity and profitability analysis of laying hen farms in Kayseri province. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2023;20(1):47-56.
  • 16. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Models for estimation of technical and scale ınefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1984;30(9):1078-1092.
  • 17. Bakırcı F. Sektörel bazda bir etkinlik ölçümü: VZA ile bir analiz. JEAS. 2006;20(2):199-217.
  • 18. Microsoft Excel MSO for Microsoft 365. Version 2405 Build 16.0.17628.20006 64 bit. Accessed February 21, 2024. https://www.microsoft.com/tr-tr/education/products/office
  • 19. Efficieny Measurement System Version 1.3 (EMS). Impact Business Models. Accessed February 17, 2024. http://www.holger-scheel.de/ems/
  • 20. IBM Corportation. IBM SPSS statistics for windows Version 25.0. Armonk, NY. Accessed February 17, 2024.
  • 21. Çevrimli MB, Mat B, Günlü A, et al. Emergency, veterinary clinical services and patient owners satisfaction criteria scales in animal hospitals: Validity and reliability study. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2019;66(3):247-254.
  • 22. Kaygısız FH, Akdağ F. A study on investigating technical states and financial structures of, and problems encountered by pet clinics in Istanbul province. J Fac Vet Med Istanbul Univ. 2004;30(2):63-78.
  • 23. Aral Y, Cevger Y, Demir P, et al. Managerial and Economic Evaluation of Small Animal Veterinary Clinics in Ankara Province of Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2010;16(3):503-508.
  • 24. Balaban C, Güneş H. A research on some socio-demographic characteristics of companion animal veterinarians and economic structures of companion animal clinics in Istanbul. JIVS. 2021;5(2):72-86.
  • 25. Özen A, Özen R, Yüksel E, et al. Effects of some factors on commercial performance of veterinary clinics I. Tendency to Obtain information and deontological attitude. FUSABIL. 2005;19(2):115-121.
  • 26. Yüksek N, Altuğ N, Özkan C, et al. Professional evaluation of private veterinary surgeons in The East and South East Anatolia Regions of Turkey: A questionnaire study. Van Vet J. 2008;19(2):57-59.
  • 27. Erdoğan Aİ, Sarıözkan S. Investigation of technical and financial structure and management problems of veterinary clinic enterprises in Nevşehir province. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2011;8(1):9-16.
  • 28. Demir P, Koç A. The evaluation of economic performances of female veterinarians in Turkey (I). IJVAR. 2020;3(3):69-73.
  • 29. Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI). Databes. Accessed January 15, 2024. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ilgosterge/?locale=tr.
  • 30. BLS-U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook. Accessed February 6, 2024. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/veterinarians.htm.
  • 31. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye (CBRT). Exchange rates. Accessed February 8, 2024. https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/kur2023_tr.html.

Kars İlindeki Veteriner Hekim Muayenehanelerinin Ekonomik Etkinliklerinin Veri Zarflama Analizi ile İncelenmesi

Year 2024, , 112 - 123, 30.08.2024
https://doi.org/10.17094/vetsci.1455906

Abstract

Bu çalışma ile Kars ilinde faaliyet gösteren veteriner hekim muayenehanelerinin ekonomik aktiflik ve karlılık durumlarının Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) kullanılarak belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmada, Kars ilinde faaliyet gösteren veteriner hekim muayenehanelerinin %53,6’sının 2023 yılına ait verileri yüz yüze uygulanan anket ile elde edilmiştir. Muayenehanelerin ekonomik açıdan etkinliklerinin tespiti için uygulanan VZA’da girdi yönlü ölçeğe göre sabit getiri tekniği (CCR) kullanılmıştır. Çalışma bulgularına göre, ankete katılan veteriner hekimlerin %6,7’si kadın, %93.3’ü ise erkek olup, %46,6’sının 25-29 yaş aralığında olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmaya katılan veteriner hekimlerin mezuniyet tarihinden itibaren tamamının meslek faaliyetlerini icra ettiği görülmüş ve çoğunluğunun (%73,3) 3-12 yıllık (mezuniyet tarihi 2011-2020) tecrübeye sahip olduğu saptanmıştır. Ankete katılan veteriner hekimlerin %10’unun lisansüstü eğitimi (tezli yüksek lisans ve doktora) aldığı tespit edilmiştir. Veteriner hekimlerin %30’unun daha önce bir muayenehanede çalıştıktan sonra muayenehane açtığı görülmüştür. Ekonomik etkinlik için yapılan VZA sonuçlarına göre muayenehanelerin %90’nın aktif olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak işletmeler etkinlik yönünden değerlendirildiğinde, ekonomik yönden etkin olmayan işletmelerin etkin olabilmesi için kira, bakım-onarım, genel idare giderleri ve diğer giderlerin azaltması gerektiği anlaşılmaktadır.

Ethical Statement

Ethical Statement This study was approved by the Kafkas University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval date and number: 29.09.2023 and 8/123).

References

  • 1. Smithcors JF. Medicine and civilization. CR. 1957;1(3): 286-302.
  • 2. Bekman M. Veteriner tarihi. Ankara Basım ve Ciltevi. Ankara; 1940.
  • 3. Armutak A. The establishment and development of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Istanbul during its first 10 years (1972-1982). DOAJ. 2002;28(2):429-445.
  • 4. Öztürk R. Historical developments in veterinary pharmaceutical industry in Turkey. Eurasian J Vet Sci. 2002; 18(3-4):45-50.
  • 5. Council of Higher Education (COHE). All universities with programs. Accessed January 3, 2024. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10232.
  • 6. Demir P, Aydın E. Veteriner hekimlikte klinik işletmeciliği ve yönetimi. In: Demir P, Aydın E. Akademisyen kitabevi. Ankara: 2021.
  • 7. Cevizci S, Erginöz E. Relationship between human health and veterinary practices: "Veterinary public health". J Fac Vet Med Istanbul Univ. 2008; 34(2): 49-62.
  • 8. Özgür A. A historical study on the term of veterinary medicine. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 1997; 44:1-8.
  • 9. Kieves NR, Roark AW, Sparks TK. Business education in veterinary schools: The potential role of the Veterinary Business Management Association. JVME. 2007;34(5):678-682.
  • 10. Can MF. Factors influencing entrepreneurship level and intention of veterinarians in Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2015;21(6):855-862.
  • 11. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429-444.
  • 12. Aydin E, Yeşilyurt C, Sakarya E. Measuring the performance of cattle fattening enterprises with data envelopment analysis: Comparative analysis of enterprises in the Northeast Anatolia Region (TRA) between the years 2009-2010. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2014;20(5):719-725.
  • 13. Demir P, Derbentli O, Sakarya E. Measurement the efficiency of dairies in the Kars province with data envelopment analysis. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2012;18(2):169-176.
  • 14. Olariu GV, Brad S. Efficiency assessment of universities with DEA method based on public data. BRCEBE. 2017;2(1):106-114.
  • 15. Sarıözkan S, Akçay A, Küçükoflaz M, et al. Productivity and profitability analysis of laying hen farms in Kayseri province. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2023;20(1):47-56.
  • 16. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Models for estimation of technical and scale ınefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1984;30(9):1078-1092.
  • 17. Bakırcı F. Sektörel bazda bir etkinlik ölçümü: VZA ile bir analiz. JEAS. 2006;20(2):199-217.
  • 18. Microsoft Excel MSO for Microsoft 365. Version 2405 Build 16.0.17628.20006 64 bit. Accessed February 21, 2024. https://www.microsoft.com/tr-tr/education/products/office
  • 19. Efficieny Measurement System Version 1.3 (EMS). Impact Business Models. Accessed February 17, 2024. http://www.holger-scheel.de/ems/
  • 20. IBM Corportation. IBM SPSS statistics for windows Version 25.0. Armonk, NY. Accessed February 17, 2024.
  • 21. Çevrimli MB, Mat B, Günlü A, et al. Emergency, veterinary clinical services and patient owners satisfaction criteria scales in animal hospitals: Validity and reliability study. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2019;66(3):247-254.
  • 22. Kaygısız FH, Akdağ F. A study on investigating technical states and financial structures of, and problems encountered by pet clinics in Istanbul province. J Fac Vet Med Istanbul Univ. 2004;30(2):63-78.
  • 23. Aral Y, Cevger Y, Demir P, et al. Managerial and Economic Evaluation of Small Animal Veterinary Clinics in Ankara Province of Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2010;16(3):503-508.
  • 24. Balaban C, Güneş H. A research on some socio-demographic characteristics of companion animal veterinarians and economic structures of companion animal clinics in Istanbul. JIVS. 2021;5(2):72-86.
  • 25. Özen A, Özen R, Yüksel E, et al. Effects of some factors on commercial performance of veterinary clinics I. Tendency to Obtain information and deontological attitude. FUSABIL. 2005;19(2):115-121.
  • 26. Yüksek N, Altuğ N, Özkan C, et al. Professional evaluation of private veterinary surgeons in The East and South East Anatolia Regions of Turkey: A questionnaire study. Van Vet J. 2008;19(2):57-59.
  • 27. Erdoğan Aİ, Sarıözkan S. Investigation of technical and financial structure and management problems of veterinary clinic enterprises in Nevşehir province. Erciyes Üniv Vet Fak Derg. 2011;8(1):9-16.
  • 28. Demir P, Koç A. The evaluation of economic performances of female veterinarians in Turkey (I). IJVAR. 2020;3(3):69-73.
  • 29. Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI). Databes. Accessed January 15, 2024. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ilgosterge/?locale=tr.
  • 30. BLS-U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook. Accessed February 6, 2024. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/veterinarians.htm.
  • 31. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye (CBRT). Exchange rates. Accessed February 8, 2024. https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/kurlar/kur2023_tr.html.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Animal Health Economics and Management
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Erol Aydın 0000-0001-8427-5658

Can İsmail Zaman 0009-0007-1302-1176

Mehmet Küçükoflaz 0000-0003-3256-4735

Merve Ayyıldız Akın 0000-0002-7362-7934

Publication Date August 30, 2024
Submission Date March 20, 2024
Acceptance Date June 23, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA Aydın, E., Zaman, C. İ., Küçükoflaz, M., Ayyıldız Akın, M. (2024). Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province with Data Envelopment Analysis. Veterinary Sciences and Practices, 19(2), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.17094/vetsci.1455906
AMA Aydın E, Zaman Cİ, Küçükoflaz M, Ayyıldız Akın M. Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province with Data Envelopment Analysis. Veterinary Sciences and Practices. August 2024;19(2):112-123. doi:10.17094/vetsci.1455906
Chicago Aydın, Erol, Can İsmail Zaman, Mehmet Küçükoflaz, and Merve Ayyıldız Akın. “Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province With Data Envelopment Analysis”. Veterinary Sciences and Practices 19, no. 2 (August 2024): 112-23. https://doi.org/10.17094/vetsci.1455906.
EndNote Aydın E, Zaman Cİ, Küçükoflaz M, Ayyıldız Akın M (August 1, 2024) Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province with Data Envelopment Analysis. Veterinary Sciences and Practices 19 2 112–123.
IEEE E. Aydın, C. İ. Zaman, M. Küçükoflaz, and M. Ayyıldız Akın, “Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province with Data Envelopment Analysis”, Veterinary Sciences and Practices, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112–123, 2024, doi: 10.17094/vetsci.1455906.
ISNAD Aydın, Erol et al. “Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province With Data Envelopment Analysis”. Veterinary Sciences and Practices 19/2 (August 2024), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.17094/vetsci.1455906.
JAMA Aydın E, Zaman Cİ, Küçükoflaz M, Ayyıldız Akın M. Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province with Data Envelopment Analysis. Veterinary Sciences and Practices. 2024;19:112–123.
MLA Aydın, Erol et al. “Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province With Data Envelopment Analysis”. Veterinary Sciences and Practices, vol. 19, no. 2, 2024, pp. 112-23, doi:10.17094/vetsci.1455906.
Vancouver Aydın E, Zaman Cİ, Küçükoflaz M, Ayyıldız Akın M. Evaluation of Economic Efficiencies of Veterinary Practices in Kars Province with Data Envelopment Analysis. Veterinary Sciences and Practices. 2024;19(2):112-23.

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License

2987230564