Morphometric and Computed Tomographic Investigation of Ligamentum Sacrotuberale in Dogs

Year 2022, Volume: 17 Issue: 3, 103 - 107, 06.01.2023

Cüneyt Tunahan Maviş Muhammet Lütfi Selçuk

https://doi.org/10.5152/VetSciPract.2022.221725

Abstract

The ligamentum sacrotuberale is an anatomical structure that is frequently used in clinical hip
dislocations and perineal hernias in dogs. However, various differences have been identified in the
description of its anatomical location in the literature. The aim of this study is to contribute to
the literature by determining the accuracy of different information specified in the literature and
determining its morphology. The study was performed on the cadavers of 7 healthy adult dogs (3
females and 4 males). Three-dimensional reconstruction of the ligamentum sacrotuberale was
performed on the images obtained by computed tomography in dogs. Dogs were then dissected
and morphometric measurements were made. As a result of the analyses performed, no statistical
difference was found when the right and left ligamentum sacrotuberale were compared (P >
.05). In our study, it was determined that in all of our dissections performed on dogs, ligamentum
sacrotuberale originated from the caudolateral surface of the last sacral vertebra and the craniolateral
of the first tail vertebra and ended on the dorsal surface of the tuber ischidicum.

Keywords

Bilgisayarlı tomografi, köpek, 3D modelleme, ligamentum sacrotuberale

Köpekte Ligamentum Sacrotuberale’nin Morfometerik ve Bilgisayarlı Tomografik İncelenmesi

Abstract

Ligamentum sacrotuberale köpeklerde klinik kalça çıkıkları ve perineal fıtıklarda sıklıkla kullanılan
anatomik bir yapıdır. Ancak literatürde anatomik yerleşiminin tanımlanmasında çeşitli farklılıklar
tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, literatürde belirtilen farklı bilgilerin doğruluğunu ve morfolojisini
belirleyerek literatüre katkı sağlamaktır. Çalışma 7 yetişkin köpeğin (3 dişi ve 4 erkek)
kadavrası üzerinde yapıldı. Köpeklerde bilgisayarlı tomografi ile elde edilen görüntüler üzerinde
lig. sacrotuberale’nin üç boyutlu rekonstrüksiyonu yapıldı. Köpekler daha sonra diseke edildi
ve morfometrik ölçümler yapıldı. Yapılan analizler sonucunda sağ ve sol ligamentum sacrotuberale
karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak fark bulunmadı (P > .05). Çalışmamızda köpeklerde
yaptığımız tüm diseksiyonlarda lig. sacrotuberale’nin son sakral omurun kaudolateral yüzeyinden
ve birinci kuyruk omurunun craniolateral yüzeyinden köken aldığı ve tuber ischidicum'un dorsal
yüzeyinde sona erdiği belirlendi.

Keywords

Bilgisayarlı tomografi, köpek, 3D modelleme, ligamentum sacrotuberale

References

• 1. Budras D, Fricke W, Richter R. Veteriner anatomi atlası köpek. Malatya, Türkiye: Medipres Yayıncılık; 2009;1:8-174.
• 2. König HE, Liebich HG. Veteriner Anatomi (Evcil Memeli Hayvanlar). 6 th ed. Malatya, Türkiye: Medipres Yayıncılık; 2015:150-556.
• 3. Evans HE, Lahunta A. Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. 4 th ed. Philadelphia: Elseiver Saunders; 2013:158-181.
• 4. Takci I, Ozcan S. Sacrotuberal ligament in the Kars Dog. J Anim Vet Adv. 2009;8(1):199-201.
• 5. Ozaydın I, Kılıç E, Baran V, Demirkan I, Kamiloglu A, Vural S. Reduction and stabilization of hip luxation by the transposition of the ligamentum sacrotuberale in dogs. An in vivo study. Vet Surg. 2003;32(1):46- 51. [CrossRef]
• 6. Venturini A, Pinna S, Tamburro R. Combined intra -extr a-art icula r technique for stabilisation of coxofemoral luxation. Preliminary results in two dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2010;23(3):182- 185. [CrossRef]
• 7. Khatri-Chhetri N, Khatri-Chhetri R, Chung CS, Chern RS, Chien CH. The spatial relationship and surface projection of canine sciatic nerve and sacrotuberous ligament: a perineal hernia repair perspective. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0152078. [CrossRef]
• 8. Yoon HY, Jeong SW. Coexistence of sciatic, dorsal, and caudal perineal hernias in a dog. J Vet Clin. 2010;27(5):584-587.
• 9. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJ. Veteriner Anatomi Konu Anlatımı ve Atlası. 4th ed. Ankara, Türkiye: Elsevier; 2018:3-475.
• 10. Anderson WD, Anderson GB. Atlas of Canıne Anatomy. Chester Field Parkway Malvern, Pensilvanya. USA: Lea & Febiger; 1994:945-947.
• 11. Schaller O. Illustrated Veterinary Anatomical Nomenclature. 2 nd ed. Germany: MVS Medizinverlage Stutgart; 2007:1-265.
• 12. Cinti F, Rossanese M, Pisani G. A novel tecnique to incorporate the sacrotuberous ligament in perineal herniorraphy in 47 dogs. Vet Surg. 2021;50(5):1023-1031. [CrossRef]
• 13. Klc E, Ozaydın I, Atalan G, Baran V. Transposition of the sacrotuberous ligament fort he treatment of coxofemoral luxation in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2006;43(8):341-344. [CrossRef]
• 14. Bahar S, Dayan MO. Two and three-dimensional computed tomographic anatomy of the guttural pouch in Arabian foals. J Anim Vet Adv. 2014;13(12):694-701. [CrossRef]
• 15. Yilmaz O, Demircioğlu İ. Morphometric analysis and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of the long bones of femoral and crural regions in Van cats. Folia Morphol. 2021;80(1):186- 195. [CrossRef]
• 16. Dobak TP, Voorhout G, Vernooij JCM, Boroffka SAEB. Computed tomographic pelvimetry in English bulldogs. Theriogenology. 2018;118:144-149. [CrossRef]
• 17. El-Gendy S, Alsafy M, Hanafy B, Karkoura A, Enany ES. Morphology, ultrasonographic and computed tomography configuration of the dog pelvis and perineum. Anat Histol Embryol. 2021;50(1):114-127. [CrossRef]
• 18. Tisnado J, Amendola MA, Walsh JW, Jordan RL, Turner MA, Krempa J. Computed tomography of the perineum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136(3):475-481. [CrossRef]
• 19. Feeney DA, Fletcher TF, Hardy RM. Atlas of correlative imaging anatomy of the normal dog, ultrasound and computed tomography. Can Vet J. 1992;33(8):546-552.
• 20. Dayan MO. Yeni Zelanda tavşanlarında mide ve bağırsakların bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntülerinden üç boyutlu görüntü elde edilmesi [Tez]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Veterinerlik Fakültesi; 2009. [CrossRef]
• 21. Gezici M, Maviş CT. Macro-anatomic, cross-sectional anatomic, and computerized tomographic examination of anal region in dogs. EurasianJVetSci. 2019;35(4):186-198. [CrossRef]
• 22. Mavis CT, Gezici M. Macro-anatomic, cross-sectional anatomic, and computerized tomographic examination of the urogenital region in dogs. ActaVetEurasia. 2022;48(1):4-11. [CrossRef]
• 23. Gill SS, Barstad RD. A review of the surgical management of perineal hernias in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2018;54(4):179-187. [CrossRef]
• 24. Jones GM, Pitsillides AA, Meeson RL. Moving beyond the limits of detection: the past, the present, and the future of diagnostic imaging in canine osteoarthritis. Front Vet Sci. 2022;15(9):1-15. [CrossRef]
• 25. Pasquini C, Spurgeon T, Pasquini S. Anatomy of Domestic Animals Systemic & Regional Approch. 11th ed. USA: Sudz Publishing; 2003:220-520.
• 26. Shahar R, Shamir MH, Niebauer GW, Johnston DE. A possible association between acquired nontraumatic inguinal and perineal hernia in adult male dogs. Can Vet J. 1996;37(10):614-616.
• 27. Bitton E, Keinan Y, Shipov A, Joseph R, Milgram J. Use of bilateral superficial gluteal muscle flaps for the repair of ventral perineal hernia in dogs: a cadaveric study and short case series. Vet Surg. 2020;49(8):1536-1544. [CrossRef]
• 28. Miller ME. Miller’s Guide to the Dissection of the Dog. 4 th ed. Philadelphia: Elseiver Saunders; 1993:211-243.