Editorial
BibTex RIS Cite

Editörden: “Sweet Dreams Are Made of This”

Year 2020, Issue: 12, 1 - 25, 20.11.2020

Abstract

Bu sunuş yazısı insan-teknoloji ilişkileri bağlamında üç ayrı stratejik konum arasındaki bağlantıya işaret ediyor: teknoloji felsefesindeki yeni tartışmalardan biri olarak postfenomenoloji; “Dördüncü Endüstri Devrimi”nin içeriği ve son kullanıcı için pazarlamanın dili. İlk bölüm, postfenomenolojinin insan-teknoloji-dünya ilişkilerini kavramsallaştırma biçimi ve teknolojiyi "monoblok, aşkın, yabancılaştırıcı ve tarihsel" bir olgu olarak tahayyül eden teknoloji felsefelerinden nasıl farklılaştığı üzerinde duruyor. İkinci sırada, bu görece yeni yaklaşımın I4.0 olarak ilan edilen son teknolojilerin maddiliği üzerinde yükseldiği vurgulanıyor. Son bölümde ise önceki tartışma çerçevesinde tekno-rüya olarak yorumlamaya çalıştığım bir televizyon reklamı yer alıyor. Öte yandan maddi kültür çalışmaları ve teknoloji felsefesi arasında bulanıklaşan sınırlar konusuna, daha kapsamlı bir tartışmayı gerektirdiğinden, bu sayıdaki yazıların tanıtımında, konuya kısaca değindim.

References

  • Achterhuis, H. (2001). Introduction: American Philosophy of Technology, In: American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn, Ed. Hans Achterhuis, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 1-9.
  • Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution, New York: Crown Business.
  • Eagleton, T. (2006). Kuramdan Sonra, (U. Abacı, Çev.). İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • Bachelard, G. (2006). Su ve Düşler: Maddenin İmgelemi Üzerine Deneme, (O. Kunal, Çev.) İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Feenberg. A. (2010). Ten Paradoxes of Technology, Techné, 14(1), pp.3-15.
  • Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Ihde, D. (1993). Philosophy of Thechnology: An Introduction, New York: Paragon House.
  • Ihde, D. (1998). Expending Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science, Evanston: Illinois: Northwetern University Press.
  • Ihde, D. (2010). Heidegger’s Technologies:Postphenomenological Perspectives, New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Ihde, D. (2012). Experimental Phenomenology: Multistabilities, Albany: State University of New York.
  • Koç, T. (1998). Din Dili, İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
  • Kösemihal, N. Ş. (1968). Sanat ve Fikir İşçileri, Batı Uygarlığı ve Biz, İstanbul: Ak Kitabevi, ss. 40-52.
  • McDannell, C. (1995). Material Christianity: Religion and Popular Culture in America, New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • Rosenberger, R. and Verbeek P-P. (2015). A Field Guide to Postphenomenology, In: Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human–Technology Relations, Edited by Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek, London: Lexington Books, pp.9-42.
  • Rosenberger, R. (2017). Callous Objects: Designs Against the Homeless, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Cologny: World Economic Forum.
  • Schwab, K. and Thierry M. (2020). COVID 19: The Great Reset, Cologny: World Economic Forum.
  • Thompson, P. B. (2020). Ihde’s Pragmatism, In: Reimagining Philosophy and Technology, Reinventing Ihde, Ed. Glen Miller and Ashley Shew. Springer International Publishing, pp. 43-61.
  • Tilley, C. (1990). Preface, In: Reading Material Culture, Ed. Christopher Tilley. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp.vii-x.
  • Verbeek, P-P. (2011). Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Verbeek, P-P. (2020). Politicizing Postphenomenology, In: Reimagining Philosophy and Technology, Reinventing Ihde, Ed. Glen Miller and Ashley Shew. Springer International Publishing, pp. 141-158.
  • Winner, L. (1986). Whale and Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Survelliance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York: Public Affairs.

Editorial: “Sweet Dreams Are Made of This”

Year 2020, Issue: 12, 1 - 25, 20.11.2020

Abstract

This introductory text addresses the connection between three divergent strategic positions within the context of human-technology relations: postphenomenology as one of the new debates within the philosophy of technology; the contents of the "Fourth Industrial Revolution" and the language of marketing for the end user. Firstly, it focuses on how postphenomenology conceptualizes human-technology-world relations and the way it differentiates itself from the philosophies of technology which imagine technology as a "monoblock, transcendent, alienating and historical" phenomenon. Secondly, it is emphasized that this relatively new trend rises on the materiality of new technologies which has been “announced” as I4.0. Lastly, there is a particular television commercial which I attempted to interpret as a techno-dream within the scope of this particular discussion. On the other hand, since the blurring boundaries between philosophy of technology and material culture studies require a more comprehensive discussion, I briefly touched upon this issue in the introduction of the articles for this particular issue.

References

  • Achterhuis, H. (2001). Introduction: American Philosophy of Technology, In: American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn, Ed. Hans Achterhuis, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 1-9.
  • Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution, New York: Crown Business.
  • Eagleton, T. (2006). Kuramdan Sonra, (U. Abacı, Çev.). İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık.
  • Bachelard, G. (2006). Su ve Düşler: Maddenin İmgelemi Üzerine Deneme, (O. Kunal, Çev.) İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Feenberg. A. (2010). Ten Paradoxes of Technology, Techné, 14(1), pp.3-15.
  • Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Ihde, D. (1993). Philosophy of Thechnology: An Introduction, New York: Paragon House.
  • Ihde, D. (1998). Expending Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science, Evanston: Illinois: Northwetern University Press.
  • Ihde, D. (2010). Heidegger’s Technologies:Postphenomenological Perspectives, New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Ihde, D. (2012). Experimental Phenomenology: Multistabilities, Albany: State University of New York.
  • Koç, T. (1998). Din Dili, İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık.
  • Kösemihal, N. Ş. (1968). Sanat ve Fikir İşçileri, Batı Uygarlığı ve Biz, İstanbul: Ak Kitabevi, ss. 40-52.
  • McDannell, C. (1995). Material Christianity: Religion and Popular Culture in America, New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
  • Rosenberger, R. and Verbeek P-P. (2015). A Field Guide to Postphenomenology, In: Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human–Technology Relations, Edited by Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek, London: Lexington Books, pp.9-42.
  • Rosenberger, R. (2017). Callous Objects: Designs Against the Homeless, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Cologny: World Economic Forum.
  • Schwab, K. and Thierry M. (2020). COVID 19: The Great Reset, Cologny: World Economic Forum.
  • Thompson, P. B. (2020). Ihde’s Pragmatism, In: Reimagining Philosophy and Technology, Reinventing Ihde, Ed. Glen Miller and Ashley Shew. Springer International Publishing, pp. 43-61.
  • Tilley, C. (1990). Preface, In: Reading Material Culture, Ed. Christopher Tilley. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp.vii-x.
  • Verbeek, P-P. (2011). Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Verbeek, P-P. (2020). Politicizing Postphenomenology, In: Reimagining Philosophy and Technology, Reinventing Ihde, Ed. Glen Miller and Ashley Shew. Springer International Publishing, pp. 141-158.
  • Winner, L. (1986). Whale and Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Survelliance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York: Public Affairs.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Editorial
Authors

Aslı Yazıcı Yakın 0000-0002-1507-0517

Publication Date November 20, 2020
Submission Date November 19, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Issue: 12

Cite

APA Yazıcı Yakın, A. (2020). Editörden: “Sweet Dreams Are Made of This”. ViraVerita E-Dergi(12), 1-25.