Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Hatıllı Duvarların Metraj ve Hakediş Süreçlerinin Yönetimi

Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 9 - 18, 30.04.2020

Abstract

Karmaşık proje teslim sistemlerinin olduğu disiplinlerarası yapım projelerinde inşaat aşamasının başladığı ve tasarım kararlarının henüz belirlenemediği, proje teslim sisteminin karmaşıklaşan yapısında, aynı model ortamında tasarımın hem kesin hem de uygulama aşamaları için çıktıları yönetmek için alternatif iş akış prosedürleri gerekmektedir. Bu makalede M9 İkitelli-Ataköy Metro Hattı Projesi’nde hatıllı duvar sistemlerinin metraj ve hakediş süreçlerini yönetmek için oluşturulan alternatif bir iş akışı sunulacaktır. Hatıllı duvarların imalatı parçalı olarak yapılmakta ve metraj bilgisi mevcut model üzerinden elde edilememektedir. Buna bağlı olarak maliyet yönetimi süreci otomatize edilememektedir. Bu nedenle projede seçilen BIM yazılımı olan Revit model üzerinde aylık hakedişlere yönelik olarak parçalı hatıllı tuğla duvar metrajı ve proje bütçesini elde etmeye yönelik toplam hatıllı tuğla duvar metrajını elde etmek için Revit yazılımı içerisinde modelleme tekniğini değiştirtirilerek yeni bir maliyet yönetimi iş akışı önerilecektir.

References

  • Bečvarovská, R., & Matějka, P. (2014). Comparative Analysis Of Creating Traditional Quantity Takeoff Method And Using A BIM Tool. In Construction Maeconomics Conference 2014.
  • Smith, P. (2014). BIM & the 5D Project Cost Manager. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.053
  • Małgorzata G., Marek S.: Challenges In Takeoffs and Cost Estimating in the BIM Technology, Based on the Example of a Road Bridge Model (2017)
  • Olsen D. and Taylor J. Quantity Takeoff Using Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Its Limiting Factors. Procedia Engineering, 2017.
  • Bylund, C. & Magnusson, A., 2012. Model based cost estimations - an international comparison. Thesis (Masters). Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Eastman C., Teicholz P., Sacks R., and Liston K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2011.
  • Monteiro A. and Martins J.P. A survey on modeling guidelines for quantity takeoff-oriented BIM-based design. Automation in Construction, 35:238-253, 2013.
  • Mattern, H., Scheffer, M., & König, M. (2018). BIM-Based Quantity Take-Off. Building Information Modeling, 383–391. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3_23
  • Khosakitchalert, C., Yabuki, N., & Fukuda, T. (2018). The Accuracy Enhancement of Architectural Walls Quantity Takeoff for Schematic BIM Models. Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC). doi: 10.22260/isarc2018/0108
  • Elbeltagi, Emad & Hosny, Ossama & Dawood, Mahmoud & Elhakeem, Ahmed. (2014). BIM-Based Cost Estimation/ Monitoring For Building Construction. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 4. 56-66.
  • https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/revit-products/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2020/ENU/Revit-Model/files/GUID-924CBB1E-71D9-47A4-9463-89CCB680C633-htm.html Last acces 19.12.2019
  • https://www.cadlinecommunity.co.uk/hc/en-us/articles/206172881-Revit-2016-Construction-Parts- Last Access 03.01.2019
Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 9 - 18, 30.04.2020

Abstract

References

  • Bečvarovská, R., & Matějka, P. (2014). Comparative Analysis Of Creating Traditional Quantity Takeoff Method And Using A BIM Tool. In Construction Maeconomics Conference 2014.
  • Smith, P. (2014). BIM & the 5D Project Cost Manager. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 475–484. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.053
  • Małgorzata G., Marek S.: Challenges In Takeoffs and Cost Estimating in the BIM Technology, Based on the Example of a Road Bridge Model (2017)
  • Olsen D. and Taylor J. Quantity Takeoff Using Building Information Modeling (BIM), and Its Limiting Factors. Procedia Engineering, 2017.
  • Bylund, C. & Magnusson, A., 2012. Model based cost estimations - an international comparison. Thesis (Masters). Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
  • Eastman C., Teicholz P., Sacks R., and Liston K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2011.
  • Monteiro A. and Martins J.P. A survey on modeling guidelines for quantity takeoff-oriented BIM-based design. Automation in Construction, 35:238-253, 2013.
  • Mattern, H., Scheffer, M., & König, M. (2018). BIM-Based Quantity Take-Off. Building Information Modeling, 383–391. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3_23
  • Khosakitchalert, C., Yabuki, N., & Fukuda, T. (2018). The Accuracy Enhancement of Architectural Walls Quantity Takeoff for Schematic BIM Models. Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC). doi: 10.22260/isarc2018/0108
  • Elbeltagi, Emad & Hosny, Ossama & Dawood, Mahmoud & Elhakeem, Ahmed. (2014). BIM-Based Cost Estimation/ Monitoring For Building Construction. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 4. 56-66.
  • https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/revit-products/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2020/ENU/Revit-Model/files/GUID-924CBB1E-71D9-47A4-9463-89CCB680C633-htm.html Last acces 19.12.2019
  • https://www.cadlinecommunity.co.uk/hc/en-us/articles/206172881-Revit-2016-Construction-Parts- Last Access 03.01.2019
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Building Technology, Civil Construction Engineering
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Eylem Zorlutuna 0000-0002-5870-3011

Publication Date April 30, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Zorlutuna, E. (2020). Hatıllı Duvarların Metraj ve Hakediş Süreçlerinin Yönetimi. Yapı Bilgi Modelleme, 2(1), 9-18.