EXPLORING THE FACTORS AFFECTING PURCHASE INTENTION IN MUSIC INDUSTRY

Year 2016, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 169 - 180, 19.10.2016

Mustafa Ağaoğlu Emine Serra Yurtkoru Yusuf Şahin

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors, ethical behavior, product involvement, attitude, perceived sacrifice, and perceived benefit, impact on purchase intention in music industry. A model is constructed and tested empirically. A sample of 255 individuals are collected and a multi-item questionnaire is used. It is found that purchase intention is relatively low for both CD/DVD and digital music whereas illegal downloading is perceived as an acceptable behavior in the society. The proposed factors are found to explain the purchase intention models in a variety of combinations depending on the music media purchased. Managers in music industry can make use of the findings and the results of this study in order to improve their business and revenue models.

Keywords: Ethical Behavior, Information Systems, Music Downloading, Perceived Benefit, Perceived Sacrifice, Purchase Intention

References

• Arli, D., Tjiptono, F., & Porto, R. (2015). The impact of moral equity, relativism and attitude on individuals’ digital piracy behaviour in a developing country. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33 (3): 348-365.
• Chu. C., & Lu. H., (2007). Factors influencing online music purchase intention in Taiwan. Internet Research, 17 (2):139 - 155.
• IFPI Global Music Report (2016). http://ifpi.org/news/IFPI-GLOBAL-MUSIC-REPORT-2016, (May 10, 2016).
• Nielsen Music Report (2016). “2015 U.S. Music Year-End Report”, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2016/2015-music-us-year-end-report.html, (June 3, 2016)
• Reidenbach, R.E. & Robin, D.P. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9 (8): 639-653.
• Reidenbach, R.E., Robin, D.P. & Dawson, L. (1991). An application and extension of a multidimensional ethics scale to selected marketing practices and marketing group. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19 (2): 83-92.
• Shoham, A., Ruvio, A. & Davidow, M. (2008). (Un)ethical consumer behavior: Robin Hoods or Plain Hoods?. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25 (4): 200-210.
• Styven, M. E. (2010). The need to touch: Exploring the link between music involvement and tangibility preference. Journal of Business Research, 63:1088–1094.
• North, A. C. & Oishi, A. (2006). Music CD Purchase Decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36 (12): 3043–3084.
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50(2): 179-211.
• Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, Personality and Behavior.2nd Edition. Open University Press (McGraw-Hill), England.
• Dodds, W.B. (1999). Managing customer value. Mid-American Journal of Business, 14 (1): 13-22.
• Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B. & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28: 307-319.
• Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N. & Johnson, L.W. (1997). Retail service quality and perceived value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 4 (1): 39-48.
• Tam, J.L.M. (2004). Customer satisfaction, service quality and perceived value: an integrative model. Journal of Marketing Management, 20: 897-917.
• Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319-40.
• van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28 (4): 695-704.