WOMEN'S REPRESENTATION GAP IN TRADE UNION MANAGEMENT: A CASE OF A PUBLIC SECTOR UNION

Abstract

Regarding the progressive decline of the social influence of the trade union movement, it is emphasized that women workers should be a potential source of members and managers in the discussions on strategies to revitalize trade unionism. However, women's access to positions such as management or leadership and their representation in these positions are severely limited due to the pervasive effects of the employment relations regime and masculine culture in various organizations of working life. This article aims to examine the representation gap of women in trade union management in a public workplace in the light of interviews with union member women. As a result, the Turkish public sector's unique political and legal dynamics, as well as the existence of unequal gender relations that have been structured in social life, have been identified as important factors that hinder the representation of women in management.

Keywords

• Trade Union
• Gender
• Public Sector

SENDİKA YÖNETİMLERİNDE KADINLARIN TEMSİL AÇIĞI: KAMU GÖREVLİLERİ SENDİKALARINA YÖNELİK BİR VAKA İNCELEMESİ

Abstract

References

1. Adler, N. (1993), “An International Perspective on the Barriers to the Advancement of Women Managers”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42: 289–300.
2. Amini, B., Peters, K., and Amorim, K. (2018) “Bringing Gender to the Forefront of the Trade Union Movement: A Roundtable with Women Labour Union Leaders around the World”, Critique, 46(2): 307-325.
3. Bayat, İ. and Baykal, B. (2021) “Toplumsal Cinsiyet Ayrımcılığının Yarattığı Engeller: Çalışma Yaşamında Varolmaya Çalışan Kadın”, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (3): 745-762.
4. Briskin, L. (2002) “The Equity Project in Canadian Unions: Confronting the Challenge of Restructuring and Globalization”, In: Colgan F and Ledwith S (eds) Gender, Diversity and Trade Unions: International Perspectives, London: Routledge, 28–47.
5. Carvalho, T. and S. Diogo (2018) “Women Rectors and Leadership Narratives: The Same Male Norm?” Education Sciences, 8: 2-75.
6. Cooper, R. (2012) “The Gender Gap in Union Leadership in Australia: A Qualitative Study”, Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(2): 131–146.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2007) ‘‘Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches’’, California: Sage Publications.
8. Çelik, H. and Ekşi, H. (2015) ‘‘Nitel Desenler: Gömülü Teori’’, İstanbul: Eğitim Danışmanlığı ve Araştırma Merkezi Yayınları.

9. ÇSGB, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı (2021) ‘‘Çalışma Hayatı İstatistikleri’’, Çalışma Genel Müdürlüğü: Ankara
10. ÇŞGB, Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı (2023) ‘‘2023 Temmuz İstatistikleri Hakkında Tebliğ, Resmi Gazete’’, 4.07.2023.
11. Fitzgerald, T. (2018) “Looking Good and Being Good: Women Leaders in Australian Universities”, Education Sciences, 8 (2): 54–66.
12. Freedman, J.L., Sears, O. D. and Carlsmith, J. M. (1981) ‘‘Social Psychology’’, New Jersey: Englevood Cliffs.
13. Kalaitzi, S., K. Czabanowska, S. Fowler-Davis and H. Brand (2017) “Women Leadership Barriers in Healthcare, Academia and Business”, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36 (5): 457–474.
14. Keleş, D. (2018) “Türkiye’de Sendika Kadın İlişkisi: Sendikacı Kadınların Bakış Açılarına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme”, Çalışma ve Toplum, 4 (59): 2047-2082.
15. Keleş, D. (2021) “Kadınların Sendikalarda Var Olma Biçimi: ‘Ataerkil Sendikal Yapıya Eklemlenme’”. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 24 (2): 253-287.