BETWEEN CRITIQUE AND CONSERVATISM: ELTON MAYO’S METHOD, POLITICAL THOUGHT AND APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT

Year 2026, Volume: 24 Issue: 1, 116 - 136, 21.03.2026

Lutfi Yalçın

https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1779677

https://izlik.org/JA95ZA24DF

Abstract

Although often regarded as an innovative administrative thinker, Mayo’s books and research reveal a distinctly conservative stance. This conservatism has become so embedded in contemporary social sciences that it often goes unnoticed. The aim of this study is to demonstrate how Mayo could be both conservative and, at the same time, innovative and critical. A qualitative–interpretive research design is employed. The analysis draws primarily on Mayo’s major works alongside key secondary literature. To complement the interpretive thematic analysis, a content analysis based on the frequency of words in Democracy and Freedom (1919) and The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization (1945) was conducted. The study reveals Mayo’s conservative outlook, which prioritized spontaneous social developments and regarded abstract, intentionally designed concepts with skepticism. It also shows that, despite his resistance to abstract formulations, Mayo consistently relied on certain ideal concepts that shaped his intellectual journey.

Keywords

Elton Mayo , Conservatism , Industrial Civilization , Spontaneous Cooperation , Informal Organization

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted using publicly available documents. It is not based on any activity that would require approval from an ethics committee

BETWEEN CRITIQUE AND CONSERVATISM: ELTON MAYO’S METHOD, POLITICAL THOUGHT AND APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT

https://izlik.org/JA95ZA24DF

Abstract

Her ne kadar yenilikçi bir yönetim düşünürü olarak görülse de, Mayo kitaplarında ve araştırmalarında oldukça belirgin bir muhafazakâr tutum sergiler. Bu muhafazakâr tutum, günümüz sosyal bilimlerine öylesine yerleşmiştir ki çoğu zaman fark edilmez. Çalışmanın amacı, Mayo’nun bir yandan muhafazakâr olurken diğer yandan nasıl yenilikçi ve eleştirel olabildiğini ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma nitel–yorumlayıcı bir araştırma tasarımına dayanmaktadır. Analiz, öncelikle Mayo’nun temel eserleri ile birlikte ilgili ikincil literatüre dayandırılmıştır. Yorumlayıcı tematik analizi desteklemek amacıyla ayrıca Democracy and Freedom (1919) ile The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization (1945) eserlerinde kullanılan sözcüklerin sıklığına dayalı bir içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Bu çalışma ile Mayo’nun, spontane toplumsal gelişmelere öncelik veren ve insan iradesinin ürünü tasarımsal kavramlara kuşkuyla yaklaşan muhafazakâr bakış açısı açık biçimde ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca, Mayo’nun düşünsel yolculuğunda her ne kadar soyut kavramlara karşı çıksa da, sürekli olarak başvurduğu bazı ideal kavramlara sahip olduğu da ortaya çıkarılmıştır.

Keywords

Elton Mayo , Muhafazakarlık , Sanayi Medeniyeti , Kendiliğinden İşbirliği , Resmî Olmayan Örgüt

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma, kamuya açık belgeler kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Etik kurul izni gerektirecek nitelikte bir faaliyete dayanmamaktadır.

References

• Bendix, R. and Fisher, L. H. (1949) “The Perspectives of Elton Mayo”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 31(4): 312–319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928657
• Bruce, K. (2006) “Henry S. Dennison, Elton Mayo, and Human Relations Historiography”, Management and Organizational History, 1(2): 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935906064095
• Fayol, H. (2016) “General and Industrial Management”, London: Ravenio Books. (Original work published 1949; French original 1916)
• Fry, Brian R. (1989) “Mastering Public Administration From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo”, New York: Chatham House Publishers.
• Güler, B. A. (2005) “Kamu Personeli: Sistem ve Yönetim”, Ankara: İmge.
• Hart, C. W. M. (1943) “The Hawthorne Experiments”, The Canadian Journal of and Political Science, 9(2): 150–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/137416
• Henderson, L. J., Whitehead, T. N., and Mayo, E. (1937) “The Effects of Social Environment”, L. Gulick and L. Urwick (eds.), Papers on the Science of Administration, New York: Columbia University.
• Ionescu, G. G. and Negrușa, A. L. (2013) “Elton Mayo, an Enthusiastical Managerial Philosopher”, Review of International Comparative Management, 14(5): 671–688.
• Levitt, S. D. and List, J. A. (2011) “Was There Really a Hawthorne Effect at the Hawthorne Plant? An Analysis of the Original Illumination Experiments”, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(1): 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.1.224
• Mayo, E. (1919) “Democracy and Freedom: An Essay in Social Logic”, Melbourne: Macmillan & Co. Ltd. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4463116
• Mayo, E. (1945) “The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization”, Boston, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration Division of Research. https://archive.org/details/socialproblemsof00mayo
• Mayo, E. (1947) “The Political Problem of Industrial Civilization”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Mayo, E. (1949) “The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization”, Boston, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration Division of Research.
• Mayo, E. (1951) “The Psychology of Pierre Janet”, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
• Mayo, E. (2003) “The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization”, K. Thompson (ed.), The Early Sociology of Management and Organizations, Vol. VI, London & New York: Routledge.
• Mayo, E. and Lombard, G. F. F. (1944) “Teamwork and Labor Turnover in the Aircraft Industry of Southern California”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration Bureau of Business Research.
• Muldoon, J., Bendickson, J., Bauman, A., and Liguori, E. W. (2020) “Reassessing Elton Mayo: Clarifying Contradictions and Context”, Journal of Management History, 26(2): 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-05-2019-0033
• O’Connor, E. (1999) “Minding the Workers: The Meaning of ‘Human’ and ‘Human Relations’ in Elton Mayo”, Organization, 6(2): 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849962004
• Ohry, A. and Matthewson, M. (2022) “Elton Mayo and Thomas Henry Reeve Mathewson: The Forgotten Australian Pioneers of the Treatment of Patients with Shell Shock, Neurasthenia and Nervous Breakdown”, History of Psychiatry, 33(1): 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X211047806
• Roethlisberger, F. J. and Dickson, W. J. (1939) “Management and the Worker: An Account of a Research Program Conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Sarachek, B. (1968) “Elton Mayo’s Social Psychology and Human Relations”, Academy of Management Journal, 11(2): 189–197.
• Smith, J. H. (1974) “Elton Mayo Revisited”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(2): 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.1974.tb01088.x
• Smith, J. H. (1975) “Foreword to the 1975 Edition: The Significance of Elton Mayo”, E. Mayo, The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization, ix–xlii, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Taylor, F. W. (1998) “The Principles of Scientific Management”, New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1911)
• Trahair, R. C. S. (1981) “Elton Mayo and the Early Political Psychology of Harold D. Lasswell”, Political Psychology, 3(3–4): 170–188.
• Trahair, R. C. S. (2009) “Elton Mayo: The Humanist Temper”, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
• Wigfall, P. M. and Kalantari, B. (2001) “Mayo, George Elton”, J. Rabin (ed.), Biographical Dictionary of Public Administration, 97-98, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.