Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY

Year 2018, Volume: 16 Issue: 1, 358 - 376, 30.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.458000

Abstract

 This paper aims to analyze the determinants of gender gap in smoking and compare the results between 2008 and 2012, the period of National Tobacco Control Action Plan. We apply the extended Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition using the Global Adult Tobacco Survey. We find that the percentage of the smoking differential explained is sensitive to the choice of the reference coefficients. Moreover, an inclusion of attitude toward tobacco law and tax variables increases the percentage of the explained differential when females and males differ only with respect to the differences in the observed characteristics. Results show that females and males respond differently to the changes in the factors of smoking. In addition, decomposition analysis reveals that contributions of the significant factors associated with gender gap in smoking differ between 2008 and 2012.

References

  • Ali, S.M., Chaix, B., Merlo, J., Rosvall, M., Wamala, S. and Lindstrom, M. (2009) “Gender differences in daily smoking prevalence in different age strata: a population-based study in southern Sweden”, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37: 146–52.
  • Arslanhan, S., Caner, A., Helvacioglu, K., Saglam, I. and Teksoz, T. (2012) ”An economic analysis of tobacco elimination policies in Turkey”, Health Policy, 106: 149–60.
  • Bauer, T.K., Gohlmann, S. and Sinning, M. (2007) “Gender differences in smoking behaviour”, Health Economics, 16: 895–909.
  • Becker, G.S. and Murphy, K.M. (1988) “A theory of rational addiction”, The Journal of Political Economy, 96(4): 675–700.
  • Blinder, A.S. (1973) “Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates”, Journal of Human Resources, 8(4): 436–455.
  • Chaloupka, F.J. (1990) “Men, Women and Addiction: The Case of Cigarette Smoking”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. No: 3267.
  • Chaloupka, F.J. and Pacula, R.L. (1999) “Sex and race differences in young people's responsiveness to price and tobacco control policies”, Tobacco Control, 8(4): 373-377.
  • Chollat-Traquet, C. M. (1992) “Women and Tobacco”, World Health Organization, Geneva.
  • Chung, W., Lim, S. and Lee, S. (2010) ” Factors influencing gender differences in smoking and their separate contributions: evidence from South Korea”, Social Science and Medicine, 70: 1966–1973.
  • Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J. and Wagner, G.G. (2005) “Individual risk attitudes: new evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey”, IZA Discussion Paper. No: 1730.
  • Erbaydar, T., Lawrence, S., Dagli, E., Hayran, O. and Collishaw, N.E. (2005) “Influence of social environment in smoking among adolescents in Turkey”, European Journal of Public Health, 15(4): 404-410.
  • Erguder, T., Çakır, B., Aslan, D., Warren, C.W., Jones, N. and Asma, S. (2008) “Evaluation of the use of global youth tobacco survey (GYTS) data for developing evidence-based tobacco control policies in Turkey”, BMC Public Health, 8 (Suppl 1), S4: 1-7.
  • Erguder, T., Polat, H., Arpad, C., Khoury, R.N., Warren, C.W., Lee, J. and Lea, V. (2012) “Linking global youth tobacco survey (GYTS) data to tobacco control policy in Turkey – 2003 and 2009”, Central European Journal of Public Health, 20 (1): 87–91.
  • Ertas, N. (2006) “Factors associated with stages of cigarette smoking among Turkish youth”, European Journal of Public Health, 17(2): 155–161.
  • Erten, B. and Aslan, D. (2008) “Patterns and dynamics of female tobacco use: a comprehensive perspective of Turkey and the United States”, Turkish Journal of Cancer, 38(3): 99–112.
  • Flandorfer, P., Wegner, C. and Buber, I. (2010), “Gender roles and smoking behaviour”, Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers. No: 7.
  • Jann, B. (2008) “The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models”, The Stata Journal, 8(4): 453–479.
  • Kilic, D. and Ozturk, S. (2014) “Gender differences in cigarette consumption in Turkey: Evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey”, Health Policy, 114: 207– 214.
  • Oaxaca, R.L. (1973) “Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets”, International Economic Review, 14(3): 693–709.
  • Oaxaca, R. and Ransom, M.R. (1994) “On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials”, Journal of Econometrics, 61: 5–21.
  • Pampel, F.C. (2001) “Cigarette diffusion and sex differences in smoking”, Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 42(4): 388–404.
  • Samet, J.M. and Yoon, S.Y. (2010) “Gender, Women and the Tobacco Epidemic”, World Health Organization, Geneva.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat) (2008) “Global Adult Tobacco Survey”, Ankara.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat) (2012) “Global Adult Tobacco Survey”, Ministry of Health Publication No: 948, Ankara.
  • Waldron, I. (1991) “Patterns and causes of gender differences in smoking”, Social Science and Medicine, 32(9): 989–1005.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2007) “Gender and tobacco control: A policy brief”, Switzerland.
  • Yen, S.T. (2005) “Zero observations and gender differences in cigarette consumption”, Applied Economics, 37: 1839–49.
  • Yun, M. (2004) “Decomposing differences in the first moment”, Economics Letters, 82(2): 275-280.
  • Yun, M. (2005) “Normalized equation and decomposition analysis: Computation and inference”, Bonn, Germany: The Institute for the Study and Labor. IZA Report no: 1822.
  • Yurekli, A., Onder, Z., Elibol, M., Erk N., Cabuk, A., Fisunoglu M., Erk S. F. and Chaloupka F. J. (2010) “The economics of tobacco and tobacco taxation in Turkey”, Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

SİGARA İÇME DAVRANIŞI CİNSİYET FARKLILIĞI: TÜRKİYE İÇİN DOĞRUSAL OLMAYAN BİR AYRIŞTIRMA YÖNTEMİ

Year 2018, Volume: 16 Issue: 1, 358 - 376, 30.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.458000

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sigara içme davranışındaki cinsiyet farklılığının belirleyicilerini analiz etmek ve Ulusal Tütün Kontrol Eylem Plan periyodu olan 2008 ve 2012 için sonuçları karşılaştırmaktır. Çalışmada, Küresel Yetişkin Tütün Araştırma Anketi verileri ile genişletilmiş Blinder-Oaxaca ayrıştırma yöntemi uygulanmaktadır. Açıklanan farklılığın yüzdesinin referans katsayısı seçimine hassas olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca, kadın ve erkekler sadece gözlemlenebilir özelliklerine göre farklılaştığında, modele tütün yasası ve vergisine yaklaşım değişkenlerinin eklenmesi açıklanan farklılığı artırmaktadır. Sonuçlar ayrıca kadın ve erkeklerin belirleyici faktörlerdeki değişimlere farklı tepki verdiklerini ve cinsiyetler arası sigara içme davranış farklılığına ilişkin anlamlı faktörlerin etkilerinin 2008 ve 2012 yılları arasında değiştiğini göstermektedir

References

  • Ali, S.M., Chaix, B., Merlo, J., Rosvall, M., Wamala, S. and Lindstrom, M. (2009) “Gender differences in daily smoking prevalence in different age strata: a population-based study in southern Sweden”, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 37: 146–52.
  • Arslanhan, S., Caner, A., Helvacioglu, K., Saglam, I. and Teksoz, T. (2012) ”An economic analysis of tobacco elimination policies in Turkey”, Health Policy, 106: 149–60.
  • Bauer, T.K., Gohlmann, S. and Sinning, M. (2007) “Gender differences in smoking behaviour”, Health Economics, 16: 895–909.
  • Becker, G.S. and Murphy, K.M. (1988) “A theory of rational addiction”, The Journal of Political Economy, 96(4): 675–700.
  • Blinder, A.S. (1973) “Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates”, Journal of Human Resources, 8(4): 436–455.
  • Chaloupka, F.J. (1990) “Men, Women and Addiction: The Case of Cigarette Smoking”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. No: 3267.
  • Chaloupka, F.J. and Pacula, R.L. (1999) “Sex and race differences in young people's responsiveness to price and tobacco control policies”, Tobacco Control, 8(4): 373-377.
  • Chollat-Traquet, C. M. (1992) “Women and Tobacco”, World Health Organization, Geneva.
  • Chung, W., Lim, S. and Lee, S. (2010) ” Factors influencing gender differences in smoking and their separate contributions: evidence from South Korea”, Social Science and Medicine, 70: 1966–1973.
  • Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J. and Wagner, G.G. (2005) “Individual risk attitudes: new evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey”, IZA Discussion Paper. No: 1730.
  • Erbaydar, T., Lawrence, S., Dagli, E., Hayran, O. and Collishaw, N.E. (2005) “Influence of social environment in smoking among adolescents in Turkey”, European Journal of Public Health, 15(4): 404-410.
  • Erguder, T., Çakır, B., Aslan, D., Warren, C.W., Jones, N. and Asma, S. (2008) “Evaluation of the use of global youth tobacco survey (GYTS) data for developing evidence-based tobacco control policies in Turkey”, BMC Public Health, 8 (Suppl 1), S4: 1-7.
  • Erguder, T., Polat, H., Arpad, C., Khoury, R.N., Warren, C.W., Lee, J. and Lea, V. (2012) “Linking global youth tobacco survey (GYTS) data to tobacco control policy in Turkey – 2003 and 2009”, Central European Journal of Public Health, 20 (1): 87–91.
  • Ertas, N. (2006) “Factors associated with stages of cigarette smoking among Turkish youth”, European Journal of Public Health, 17(2): 155–161.
  • Erten, B. and Aslan, D. (2008) “Patterns and dynamics of female tobacco use: a comprehensive perspective of Turkey and the United States”, Turkish Journal of Cancer, 38(3): 99–112.
  • Flandorfer, P., Wegner, C. and Buber, I. (2010), “Gender roles and smoking behaviour”, Vienna Institute of Demography Working Papers. No: 7.
  • Jann, B. (2008) “The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models”, The Stata Journal, 8(4): 453–479.
  • Kilic, D. and Ozturk, S. (2014) “Gender differences in cigarette consumption in Turkey: Evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey”, Health Policy, 114: 207– 214.
  • Oaxaca, R.L. (1973) “Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets”, International Economic Review, 14(3): 693–709.
  • Oaxaca, R. and Ransom, M.R. (1994) “On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials”, Journal of Econometrics, 61: 5–21.
  • Pampel, F.C. (2001) “Cigarette diffusion and sex differences in smoking”, Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 42(4): 388–404.
  • Samet, J.M. and Yoon, S.Y. (2010) “Gender, Women and the Tobacco Epidemic”, World Health Organization, Geneva.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat) (2008) “Global Adult Tobacco Survey”, Ankara.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat) (2012) “Global Adult Tobacco Survey”, Ministry of Health Publication No: 948, Ankara.
  • Waldron, I. (1991) “Patterns and causes of gender differences in smoking”, Social Science and Medicine, 32(9): 989–1005.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2007) “Gender and tobacco control: A policy brief”, Switzerland.
  • Yen, S.T. (2005) “Zero observations and gender differences in cigarette consumption”, Applied Economics, 37: 1839–49.
  • Yun, M. (2004) “Decomposing differences in the first moment”, Economics Letters, 82(2): 275-280.
  • Yun, M. (2005) “Normalized equation and decomposition analysis: Computation and inference”, Bonn, Germany: The Institute for the Study and Labor. IZA Report no: 1822.
  • Yurekli, A., Onder, Z., Elibol, M., Erk N., Cabuk, A., Fisunoglu M., Erk S. F. and Chaloupka F. J. (2010) “The economics of tobacco and tobacco taxation in Turkey”, Paris: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Didem Pekkurnaz 0000-0002-1654-2731

Zeynep Elitaş 0000-0002-0715-8447

Publication Date September 30, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 16 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Pekkurnaz, D., & Elitaş, Z. (2018). GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(1), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.458000
AMA Pekkurnaz D, Elitaş Z. GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. September 2018;16(1):358-376. doi:10.11611/yead.458000
Chicago Pekkurnaz, Didem, and Zeynep Elitaş. “GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16, no. 1 (September 2018): 358-76. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.458000.
EndNote Pekkurnaz D, Elitaş Z (September 1, 2018) GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16 1 358–376.
IEEE D. Pekkurnaz and Z. Elitaş, “GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 358–376, 2018, doi: 10.11611/yead.458000.
ISNAD Pekkurnaz, Didem - Elitaş, Zeynep. “GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 16/1 (September 2018), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.458000.
JAMA Pekkurnaz D, Elitaş Z. GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;16:358–376.
MLA Pekkurnaz, Didem and Zeynep Elitaş. “GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY”. Yönetim Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 16, no. 1, 2018, pp. 358-76, doi:10.11611/yead.458000.
Vancouver Pekkurnaz D, Elitaş Z. GENDER GAP IN SMOKING: A NONLINEAR DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS FOR TURKEY. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2018;16(1):358-76.