PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION-TURKEY RELATIONS: EFFECT OF VISA LIBERALISATION DIALOGUE

Year 2019, Volume: 17 Issue: 4, 35 - 58, 30.12.2019

Altuğ Günar , Oğuz Güner

https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.553594

Abstract

The European Union is rather successful at making regulations and law whose influence go beyond the European territory, as these acts are widely considered as common standards. One of them is about personal data protection. The European Union accepted a new regulation on the protection of personal data which was put in practice in May 2018, after a long period of discussions. The regulation was accepted for the replacement of laws about data protection in member and candidate states. As a European Union candidate country, Turkey started a visa liberation dialogue with the European Union in 2013. Personal data protection issue has been one of the most crucial subjects of the visa liberation process and considered as an important requirement which must be fulfilled by Turkey. In this respect, the study will elaborate the European Union’s regulation on new personal data protection under the case of Turkey’s visa liberalisation dialogue. In the first chapter, the historical development of personal data protection, the European Union data protection regulation and current situation will be analysed. In the second chapter, the study will elaborate the issue of data protection under the case of visa liberation dialogue between Turkey and the European Union. In the last chapter, aiming to reveal the differences between General Data Protection Regulation and Turkish data protection legislation, Turkey’s cohesion to the European Union’s data protection regulation within the frame of visa liberation dialogue will be dealt. In this context, differentiating from present studies and researches in the literature, this study asserts that visa liberalisation dialogue catalyses Turkey’s compliance with the European Union’s data protection standards.

Keywords

Personal Data Protection, European Union, Turkey, Visa Freedom, Privacy

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ-TÜRKİYE İLİŞKİLERİNDE KİŞİSEL VERİNİN KORUNMASI: VİZE SERBESTİSİ DİYALOĞU ETKİSİ

Abstract

Avrupa Birliği düzenleme ve mevzuat hazırlama ve bu düzenlemelerle tüm dünyaya etki bırakabilme konusunda oldukça başarılı bir aktördür. Avrupa Birliği’nin hazırladığı düzenlemelerden biri de kişisel verilerin korunması üzerinedir. Avrupa Birliği, uzun tartışmalar sonunda Mayıs 2018’te veri koruma düzenlemesini yürürlüğe koymuştur. Bu düzenleme üye ve aday ülkelerdeki veri koruma kanunlarının yerine geçecek şekilde kabul görmüştür. Avrupa Birliği’nin bir aday ülkesi olarak Türkiye 2013 yılında Birlik ile vize serbestisi diyaloğu başlatmıştır. Kişisel veriler ve bu verilerin korunması hususu da vize serbestisi sürecinin önemli konularından biri olarak yer almış, yerine getirilmesi gereken önemli kriterlerden biri olarak dikkat çekmiştir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, Türkiye’nin vize diyaloğu açısından Avrupa Birliği’nin yeni kişisel veri koruma düzenlemesini analiz edecektir. Birinci bölümde kişisel veri korumanın tarihsel gelişimi, Avrupa Birliği’nde kişisel veri düzenlemesi uygulamalarının gelişimi ve mevcut durum değerlendirilecektir. İkinci bölümde çalışma, kişisel veri koruma sürecini Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği kapsamında başlatılan vize serbestisi diyaloğu kapsamında ele alacaktır. Son bölümde ise, Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği arasındaki kişisel veri korumaya yönelik farklılıkların ortaya konması amaçlanarak, Avrupa Birliği’nin yeni kabul etmiş olduğu kişisel veri koruma kanuna Türkiye’nin uyumunun vize serbestisi diyaloğu ile nasıl gerçekleştirildiğine dikkat çekilmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma literatürde mevcut olan çalışmalarda farklılaşarak, vize diyaloğu sürecinin Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği kişisel veri koruma standartlarına uyumu açısından bir katalizör görevi gördüğünü iddia etmektedir.

Keywords

Kişisel Veri Koruma, Avrupa Birliği, Türkiye, Vize Serbestisi, Mahremiyet

References

• Akıncı, A. N. (2017). Avrupa Birliği Genel Veri Koruma Tüzüğü’nün Getirdiği Yenilikler ve Türk Hukuku Bakımından Değerlendirilmesi. İktisadi Sektörler ve Koordinasyon Genel Müdürlüğü T.C Kalkınma Bakanlığı.
• Atak, S. (2010). Avrupa Konseyi’nin Kişisel Verileri Açısından Sağladığı Temel Güvenceler. Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, 87, 90-120.
• Bürgin, A. (2013). Salience Path Dependency and the Coalition Between the European Commission and the Danish Council Presidency: Why the EU opened a Visa Liberalisation Process with Turkey? European Integration Online Papers, 1, 1-19.
• Bergkamp, L. (2002). The Privacy Fallacy: Adverse Effect of European Data Protection Policy in an Information-Driven Economy . Computer Law & Security Report, p. 31- 35.
• Bossong, R., Carrapico, H. (2016). EU Borders and Shifting Internal Security, Technology, Springer, p. 72.
• Council of Europe. (1981). Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/1680078b37
• Commission, E. (2018). European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR). Retrieved from Migration and Home Affairs: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/border-crossing/eurosur_
• Council of Europe, & European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). Handbook on European Data Protection Law. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
• Çelik, Y. (2017). Özelik Hayatın Gizliliğinin Yansıması Olarak Kişisel Verilerin Korunması ve Bu Bağlamda Unutulma Hakkı. Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 8(32), 387- 406.
• Digital Single Market. (2017). Bringing down barriers to unlock online opportunities. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/digital-single-market_enEuropa Nu. (2016). Q&A: Third Report on Progress by Turkey in fulfilling the requirements of its Visa Liberalisation Roadmap. Retrieved from https://www.europa- nu.nl/id/vk3sgwa3a0z4/nieuws/q_a_s_third_report_on_progress_by_turkey?ctx=vgaxlcr1jzmx
• European Commission. (2013). Roadmap Towards a Visa-Free Regime with Turkey, Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-is- new/news/news/docs/20131216-roadmap_towards_the_visa-free_regime_with_turkey_en.pdf
• European Commission. (2014). Report From the Commission to the European Parliament and The Council on the Progress by Turkey in Fulfilling the Requirements of its Visa Liberalisation Roadmap. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0646&from=EN
• European Commission. (2016a). Directive on Protection of Natural Persons in relation to the Processing of Personal Data. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
• European Commission. (2016b). Report From the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council Second Report on Progress by Turkey in Fulfilling the Requirements of its Visa Liberalisation Roadmap. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0140
• European Commission. (2016c). Report From the Commission to the European Parliament And the Council Third Report on Progress by Turkey in Fulfilling the requirements of its Visa Liberalisation Roadmap. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0278&from=EN
• European Commission. (2016d). Turkey’s Progress on the Visa Liberalisation Roadmap. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we- do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background- information/docs/20160504/turkey_progress_visa_liberalisation_roadmap_en.pdf
• European Council Council of the European Union. (2015). Meeting of the EU heads of state or government with Turkey, 29/11/2015. Retrieved from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-summit/2015/11/29/
• Eurobarometer. (2015). Special Eurobarometer 431 "Data Protection". Brussels: Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers (DG JUST).
• Europe, C.O. (1985, 10 1). Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data. May 4th, 2018 retrieved from Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data on https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/108
• European Commission. (2017). Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communication. Brussels.
• European Data Protection Supervisor. (no date information). European Data Protection Supervisor. May 5th, 2018, retrieved from https://edps.europa.eu/about-edps_en
• Fuster, L. G. (2014). The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU. Brussel: Springer International Publishing.
• Hoven, J. v. (2008). Information Technology, Privacy, and the Protection of Personal Data. J. V. Hoven, & J. Weckert, Information Technology and Moral Philosophy (s. 301-318). Newyork: Cambridge University Press.
• İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı. (2015). Türkiye'de ve AB'de Kişisel Verilerin Korunması. İstanbul: İKV Yayınları.
• Jeandesboz, J. (2017). European border policing: EUROSUR, knowledge, calculation. Global Crime, p. 257-258.Kişisel Verileri Koruma Kurumu. (2019). Kişisel Verileri Koruma Kurumu. April 13th, 2019, retrieved from https://www.kvkk.gov.tr/Icerik/5398/History
• Kutlu, Ö., Kahraman S. (2017). Türkiye’de Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Politikasının Analizi. Siyaset Ekonomik ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(4), p. 45-62.
• Küzeci, E. (2011). Anayasal Bir Hak: Kişisel Verilerin Korunması. Bilişim Dergisi, 38(128), 142-149.
• Mevzuat.gov.tr. (2016). Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu. Retrieved from http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6698.pdf
• OECD. (2002). OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
• Official Journal of the European Communities. (2000). Charter of Fundamental Rights of The European Union. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf
• Official Journal of the European Union. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 603/2013. Brussels.
• Official Journal of the European Union. (2013). Regulation (EU) No: 1052/2013. Brussels.
• Özsöz, M., Bozçağa, M.Ö. (2010). Anayasa Değişikliği Paketinin Türkiye’nin AB Müktesebatına Uyumuna Etkisi. İKV Değerlendirme Notu. Retrieved from https://www.ikv.org.tr/images/upload/data/files/anayasa_degisikligi_degerlendirme_notu(1).pdf
• Roots, L. (2015). The New EURODAC Regulation: Fingerprints as a Source of Informal Discrimination. Baltic Journal of European Studies- Tallinn University of Technology, p. 108-125.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2011). Turkey and the European Union have launched a dialogue on visa liberalisation and signed the Readmission Agreement. Retrieved from http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkey-and-the-european-union-have-launched-a-dialogue-on-visa-liberalisation-and-signed-the-readmission-agreement.en.mfa
• Stiglmayer, A. (2012). Visa-Free Travel for Turkey: In Everybody’s Interest. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 11(11), p. 99-109.
• United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
• (2016). Patrolling Power Europe: The Role of Satellite Observation in EU Border Management. I. Słomczynska, & P. Frankowski içinde, EU Borders and Shifting Internal Security (s. 73-74). London: Springer International Publishing.