4 cm’den büyük renal hücreli kanserde laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi

Year 2012, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 10 - 15, 01.08.2012

Volkan Tuğcu Alper Bitkin Erkan Sönmezay Hakan Polat Ali İhsan Taşçı

Abstract

Amaç: Laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi yaygın olarak 4 cm’den küçük renal tümörler için uygulanır. Bu çalışmada 4 cm’den büyük renal tümörlerde transperitoneal laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi uyguladığımız 13 vakanın sonuçlarını sunuyoruz.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Mart 2008 – Kasım 2011 tarihleri arasında 4 cm’den büyük renal tümörlü 13 hastaya laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi uygulandı. Ortalama yaş 59,4 . Hastaların 7’si erkek, 6’i kadın idi. Tüm hastalara transperitoneal yaklaşım uygulandı. Operasyon sonrası 6.ay ve daha sonra yıllık olarak hastalara Abdominal BT ve Akciğer grafisi/ Toraks BT çekildi.Bulgular: Ortalama tümör boyutu 5 cm. Otalama sıcak iskemi süresi 29,3 dk, operasyon süresi ise 205 160 – 255 dk olarak ölçüldü. 4 hastada toplayıcı sistem açıldı. Ortalama kan kaybı miktarı 295 210 – 420 ml. Hastanede kalış süresi ortalama 4,7 3–9 gün. 13 hastanın patoloji sonucu renal hücreli karsinom olarak geldi 9’u berrak hücreli, 3’si papiller hücreli, 1’i kromofob hücreli . Bütün hastalarda cerrahi sınırı negatif geldi. Takiplerde hiçbir hastada lokal rekürrens veya uzak metastaz görülmedi.Sonuç: Bizim başlangıç deneyimlerimize göre 4 cm’den büyük tümörlerde laparoskopik parsiyel nefrektomi güvenli ve uygulanabilir bir tekniktir. Bununla birlikte bu sonuçların doğrulanabilmesi için daha uzun süre takip edilen çalışmalar gerekmektedir

Keywords

Büyük renal tümör , laparoskopi , parsiyel nefrektomi

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy LPN is most commonly performed for renal tumors

Keywords

Laparoscopy , large renal tumor , partial nephrectomy

References

• European Network of Cancer Registries. Eurocim version 4.0. European incidence database V2.3, 730 entity dictio- nary (2001), Lyon, 2001.
• Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2006; Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2353- 8.176:2353-8.
• Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV. Lapa- roscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol 1993;7:521-6.
• Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al. Comparison of 1,800 la- paroscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumours. J Urol 2007; 178:41–46.
• Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tu- mours in 200 patients. J Urol 2003; 170:64–68.
• Haber GP, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 2006; 49:660–665.
• Lane BR, Gill IS. 5-Year outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2007;177:70–74 (discussion 74).
• Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A et al. Practice Gu- idelines Committee of the American Urological Associa- tion. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009 Oct; 182 (4): 1271–9.
• Hafez KS, Fergany AF, Novick AC. Nephron sparing sur- gery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumour size on patient survival, tumour recurrence, and TNM sta- ging. J Urol 1999; 162:1930–33.
• Pasticier G, Timsit M-O, Badet L et al. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: detailed analysis of comp- lications over a 15-year period. Eur Urol 2006; 49:485–90
• Patard JJ, Shvarts O, Lam JS et al. Safety and eYcacy of par- tial nephrectomy for all T1 tumours based on an interna- tional multicenter experience. J Urol 2004; 171:2181–85.
• Pahernik S, Roos F, Rohrig B et al. Elective nephron- sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm. J Urol 2008; 179:71–74.
• Carini M, Minervini A, Lapini A et al. Simple enucleation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm in greatest dimension: progression and long-term sur- vival. J Urol 2006; 175(6):2022–26.
• Simmons MN, Chung BI, Gill IS. Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2009; 55(1):199–207.
• Stephenson AJ, Hakimi AA, Snyder ME, Russo P. Compli- cations of radical and partial nephrectomy in a large con- temporary cohort. J Urol 2004;171:130–34.
• Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal corti- cal tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:735-40.
• Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitali- zation. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296-1305.
• Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al. Nephron spa- ring surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcino- ma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radi- cal nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004;171:1066-70.
• Desai MM, Gill IS, Ramani AP, Spaliviero M, Rybicki L, Kaouk JH. The impact of warm ischaemia on renal func- tion after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2005;95:377–83.
• Janetschek G. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for RCC: how can we avoid ischemic damage of the renal parench- yma? Eur Urol 2007;52:1303–5.
• Margreiter M, Marberger M. Current status of open par- tial nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2010 Sep; 20 (5): 361-4.
• Marberger M. Renal ischaemia: Not a problem in laparos- copic partial nephrectomy? BJU Int 2007 Jan; 99 (1): 3–4.
• Thompson RH, Frank I, Lohse CM et al. The impact of isc- hemia time during open nephron sparing surgery on soli- tary kidneys: A multiinstitutional study. J Urol 2007 Feb; 177 (2): 471–6.
• Shikanov S, Lifshitz D, Chan AA et al. Impact of ischemia on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. J Urol 2010 May; 183 (5): 1714–8.
• Matthew N. Simmons, Benjamin I. Chung, Inderbir S. Gill. Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrec- tomy for tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur. Urol 2009;55:199-208.
• Nouralizadeh A, Simforoosh N, Tabibi A et al. Laparosco- pic partial nephrectomy for tumours >4 cm compared with smaller tumours: perioperative results. Int Urol Neph- rol. 2011; Jun;43(2):371-6.
• Wright JL, Porter JR. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal appro- aches. J Urol 2005;174:841-5.
• Verhoest G, Manunta A, Bensalah K et al.Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with clamping of the renal parench- yma: initial experience. Eur Urol 2007;52:1340-6.
• Nguyen MM, Gill IS. Halving ischemia time during lapa- roscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008 Feb; 179 (2): 627–32
• Olweny EO, Park SK, Seideman CA et al. Self-retaining bar- bed suture for parenchymal repair during laparoscopic par- tial nephrectomy; initial clinical experience. BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):906-9.
• Kural AR, Atug F, Tufek I et al. Robot-assisted partial ne- phrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: com- parison of outcomes. J Endourol 2009;23(9):1491-7.
• Hoznek A, Salomon L, Antiphon P et al. Partial nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. J Urol 1999;162:1922-6.
• Lotan Y, Gettman MT, Ogan K et al. Clinical use of the holmium: YAG laser in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2002;16:289-92.
• Rais-Bahrami S, Romero FR, Lima GC et al. Elective lapa- roscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with tumours>4 cm. Urology 2008;72:580–83.
• Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Piechaud T et al. Laparoscopic parti- al nephrectomy for large renal masses: results of a Europe- an survey. World J Urol. 2010 Aug;28(4):525-9.
• Simmons MN, Weight CJ, Gill IS. Laparoscopic Ra- dical Versus Partial Nephrectomy for Tumors >4 cm: Intermediate-term Oncologic and Functional Outcomes Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1077-82.