TRUS biyopsideki perinöral invazyonun tümör hacmi ve lokalizasyonuyla ilişkisi

Abstract

Amaç: TRUS biyopsideki perinöral invazyonun PNI tümör pozitif olan korlar ve bu korlardaki tümör hacmi ile ilişkisini araştırmak. Gereç ve Yöntemler: TRUS biyopsi yapılan ve patoloji sonucu prostat adenokarsinomu saptanan 85 hastanın bilgileri değerlendirildi. Biyopside herhangi bir korda gözlemlenen perinöral invasyon, raporda “PNI + ” olarak rapor edildi ve ayrıca her kordaki tümör hacmi “yüzdelik oranda” belirtildi. Hastalar patoloji raporuna göre PNI + ve PNI - olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. İki grup yaş, PSA, prostat hacmi, Gleason skoru, biyopsi alınan kor sayısı, kanser pozitif kor sayısı, kanser pozitif kor lokalizasyonu, korlardaki tümör yüzdesi bulgularıyla istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırıldı.Bulgular: 85 hastanın 42’si %49,4 PNI + ve 43’ü %50,6 PNI - idi. Bununla beraber median PSA değeri, Gleason skoru ve tümör pozitif kor sayısı PNI + grupta anlamlı derecede yüksekti. Transizyonel zon hariç P:0.217 diğer tüm korlarda PNI + gruptaki tümör hacmi anlamlı derecede fazlaydı P:0.00 . PNI + gruptaki tümör hacmi PNI - grubun yaklaşık 4 katı idi. Biyopsideki PNI varlığının tümör pozitif korlar ile ilişkisi değerlendirildiğinde, PNI + grupta Transizyonel zon hariç diğer tüm korlardaki tümör pozitifliğinin PNI - gruba göre anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu tesbit edildi.Sonuç: PNI pozitifliği olan hastaların pozitif kor sayılarını ve biyopsi korlarındaki tümör hacimlerini anlamlı derecede yüksek bulduk ve bunu kantitatif olarak sunduk. Bu bulguların tedavi yöntemini ve yapılacaksa cerrahi yöntemi yönlendirecek ipuçları taşıdığını düşünmekteyiz

Keywords

• Prostat kanseri,perinöral invazyon,tümör hacmi

Perineural invasion association with tumor volume and tumor positive core locations in TRUS biopsy

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the association of perineural invasion with tumor positive cores and tumor volume in TRUS biopsy.Material and Methods: 85 patients, diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma via TRUS biopsy were evaluated. Of any observed perineural invasion in any core for each patient was reported as “PNI + ”. Also the amount of tumor in the each core was reported by percentage. Patients were divided into two groups due to their pathology reports which were PNI + or PNI - . Age, PSA, prostate volume, Gleason score, number of biopsy cores, the number of cancer-positive cores, cancer-positive core localizations, percentage of tumor in each core findings were compared statistically between two groups.Results: Of patients 42 49,4% were PNI + and 43 50,6% were PNI - .Median PSA, gleason score and number of tumor positive cores were significantly higher in PNI + group. Also the percentage of tumor in each core was significantly higher in PNI + group p:0.00 , except transition zone P:0.217 . Approximately, tumor percentage in PNI + group was 4 fold of PNI - was. By the association between PNI and tumor positivity in the cores; tumor was being higher in whole cores in PNI + group then the other, except transition zone.Conclusion: It was presented quantitatively in our study that number of tumor positive biSonuç: PNI pozitifliği olan hastaların pozitif kor sayılarını ve biyopsi korlarındaki tümör hacimlerini anlamlı derecede yüksek bulduk ve bunu kantitatif olarak sunduk. Bu bulguların tedavi yöntemini ve yapılacaksa cerrahi yöntemi yönlendirecek ipuçları taşı

Keywords

• Prostate cancer,perineural invasion,tumor volume

References

1. Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, et al. Cancer sta- tistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin. 2001;51 (1):15-36.
2. Reiter RE, deKernion JB. Carcinoma of the prostate. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, eds. Campbells Urology. 8th ed. New York: Saunders, 2002;3003-3024.
3. Buhmeida A, Pyrhönen S, Laato M, et al. Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. Diagnostic Pathology 2006;1:4.
4. McNeal JE, Bostwick DG, Kindrachuk RA, et al. Patterns of progression in prostate cancer. Lancet 1986;1:60-63.
5. Takahashi H, Ouchi T: The ultrasonic diagnosis in the field of urology. Proc. Jap.Soc. Ultrasonics Med. 3: 7, 1963.
6. Partin AW, Stutzmann RE: Elevated prostatic specific anti- gen, abnormal prostate evaluation on digital rectal exami- nation, and transrectal ultrasound and prostate biopsy. Urol Clin North America. 1998; 25: 581.
7. Metllin C, Chesley AE, Murphy GP: Association of free PSA percent, total PSA, age, and gland volume in the detection of prostate cancer. Prostate. 1999; 39: 153.
8. Lee, F. Torp-Pedersen, S.T. and Siders, D.B.: Use of trans- rectal ultrasound in diagnosis, guided biopsy, staging, and screening of prostate cancer. Urology. 1989; 33:7.

9. Harnden P, Shelley MD, Clements H, Coles B, Tyndale- Biscoe RS, Naylor B, Mason MD. The prognostic signifi- cance of perineural invasion in prostatic cancer biopsies: a systematic review. Cancer. 2007 Jan 1;109(1):13-24.
10. Bastacky SI, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. Relationship betwe- en perineural tumor invasion on needle biopsy and radi- cal prostatectomy capsular penetration in clinical stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17 (4):336-41.
11. Vargas SO, Jiroutek M, Welch WR, et al. Perineural invasi- on in prostate needle biopsy specimens. Correlation with extraprostatic extension at resection. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;111 (2):223-8.
12. Byar DP, Mostofi FK. Carcinoma of the prostate: prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical pros- tatectomies. Examined by the step-section technique. Can- cer 1972;30 (1):5-13.
13. Amin M, Boccon-Gibod L, Egevad L, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2005; (216):20-33.
14. Alberto A. Antunes, Miguel Srougi, et al. Preoperative De- termination of Prostate Cancer Tumor Volume: Analysis through Biopsy Fragments. International Braz J Urol. Vol. 33 (4): 477-485, July - August, 2007.
15. Passavanti G, Pizzuti V: Perineural invasion in prosta- tic carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: the role of TR systematic biopsy. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2007 Mar;79(1):23-5.
16. Gutiérrez C, Terrasa F, Briones G, Conde G, Fuentes I, Hidal- go F, Bestard J, Rebassa M. Prognostic role of perineural in- vasion in prostate biopsy. Actas Urol Esp. 2011;35(6):347-53.
17. Katz B, Srougi M, Dall’oglio M, Nesrallah AJ, Sant’anna AC, Pontes J Jr, Antunes AA, Reis ST, Viana N, Sañudo A, Camara-Lopes LH, Leite KR. Perineural invasion detecti- on in prostate biopsy is related to recurrence-free survival in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol. 2011 Jul 25.
18. Al-Hussain T, Carter HB, Epstein JI. Significance of prostate adenocarcinoma perineural invasion on biopsy in patients who are otherwise candidates for active surveillance. J Urol. 2011;186(2):470-3.
19. Cannon GM Jr, Pound CR: Perineural invasion in prosta- te cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of po- sitive surgical margins. Prostate. 2005 Jun 1;63(4):336-40.
20. Algaba F, Arce Y, Oliver A, Barandica C, et al. Prognostic parameters other than Gleason score for the daily evalua- tion of prostate cancer in needle biopsy. Eur Urol. 2005;48 (4):566-71.
21. Epstein JI: The role of perineural invasion and other biopsy characteristics as prognostic markers for localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol. 1998 Aug;16(3):124-8.
22. Merrick GS, Butler WM: Prognostic significance of perine- ural invasion on biochemical progression-free survival after prostate brachytherapy. : Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):1048-53.
23. Beard C, Schultz D: Perineural invasion associated with inc- reased cancer-specific mortality after external beam radiati- on therapy for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Oct 1;66(2):403- 7. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
24. Lee IH, Roberts R: Perineural invasion is a marker for pat- hologically advanced disease in localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 15;68(4):1059-64. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
25. Yu HH, Song DY: Perineural invasion affects biochemi- cal recurrence-free survival in patients with prostate can- cer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy. Uro- logy. 2007 Jul;70(1):111-6.
26. Feng FY, Qian Y, Stenmark MH, Halverson S, Blas K, Van- ce S, Sandler HM, Hamstra DA. Perineural invasion pre- dicts increased recurrence, metastasis, and death from pros- tate cancer following treatment with dose-escalated radiati- on therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81(4):e361-7.
27. Huang J, Vicini FA, Williams SG, Ye H, McGrath S, Ghile- zan M, Krauss D, Martinez AA, Kestin LL. Percentage of Positive Biopsy Cores: A Better Risk Stratification Model for Prostate Cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 16.
28. Stone NN, Stock RG, Parikh D, et al: Perineural Invasi- on and Seminal Vesicle Involvement Predict Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Men With Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate. Stone NN, Stock RG, Parikh D, et al. J Urol. 1998;160:1722-1726.