Adölesan varikoselin klinik görünümü ve belirtilerin önemi

Abstract

Amaç: Kliniğimize başvurup adölesan varikosel nedeniyle opere edilen hastaların klinik görünümü ve mevcut şikayetlerin görülme sıklığını değerlendirdik ve hastalık sürecinde bu şikayetlerin önemini belirledik.Gereç ve Yöntemler: 1995 ile 2012 yılları arasında varikosel nedeniyle cerrahi tedavi yapılmış olan 18 yaş altındaki hastaların kayıtlarını geriye dönük inceledik.Bulgular: Varikosel hastalığından dolayı 71 hastaya ortalama yaş 16.4, 11-18 yaş aralığında cerrahi müdahale yapıldı. Ağrı şikayeti varikosel cerrahisi yapılan hastaların ana geliş nedeniydi, 46 çocukta %58.2 sadece ağrı, 14 çocukta %17.7 sadece kozmetik, 7 çocukta sadece şişlik, 7 çocukta ağrı ve kozmetik, 5 çocukta ağrı ve şişlik şikayeti vardı. Klinik evre aritmetik ortalaması grup 1’de sadece ağrı en düşük iken, grup 3’de sadece şişlik en yüksekti. sırasıyla 2.11 ve 2.71 Sonuç: Ağrı şikayeti adölesan yaş grubunda varikosel nedeniyle cerrahi yapılanlarda ana sebepti. Kozmetik ve şişlik şikayetleri olan varikosel hastalarında ortalama klinik evre ağrı şikayeti olan hastalara göre daha yüksekti ve bu ağrı şikayetinin hastaların doktora erken gelmesine neden olduğunu gösterir. Belli bir ağrı şikayeti yokken, ebeveynin bilinçli olması teşhisin erken konulmasında önemli bir payı oluşturur. Ebeveynlerin eğitimi ve bilgilendirilmesiyle, daha iyi sonuçlar elde edilebilir

Keywords

• Adölesan Varikosel,Klinik Görünüm,Şikayetler

Clinical presentation of adolescent varicocele and importance of symptoms

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the clinical presentation and proportion of presenting symptoms of patients operated due to adolescent varicocele in our clinic, and assessed the importance of the presenting symptoms for progression of the disease. Materials and Methods: Clinical records of patients younger than 18 years old underwent surgical treatment for varicocele between 1995 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Seventy-one patients mean age 16.4, range 11 to 18 underwent surgery due to varicocele disease. Pain complaint was the most common presenting symptom of the patients underwent varicocele surgery, 46 boys 58.2% had only pain, 14 boys 17.7% had only cosmetic complaint, 7 boys 8.8% had only swelling, 7 boys 8.8% had pain+cosmetic, 5 boys 6.3% had pain+swelling symptoms. While the arithmetic mean of clinical grade was lowest in group 1 pain only , it was highest in group 3 swelling only 2.11 vs. 2.71, respectively .Conclusion: The pain symptom was the main reason for the varicocele surgery performed in adolescent age group. Mean clinical grades of varicocele of patients with cosmetic and swelling symptoms were higher than that of the patients with pain symptom and this means that the pain complaint causes the patient coming early to the doctor. While there is no particular pain symptom, parental awareness constitutes an important part of the early diagnosis. With training and informing parents, the better results can be achieved

Keywords

• Adolescent Varicocele, Clinical Presentation, Symptoms

References

1. Greenfield SP, Sevile P. Wan J. Experience with varicoceles in children and young adults. J Urol 2002; 168:1684-8.
2. Niedzielski J, Paduch D, Racynski P. Assessment of adoles- cent varicocele. Pediatr Surg Int 1997; 12: 410-3.
3. Akbay E, Cayan S, Doruk E, Duce MN, Bozlu M. The pre- valence of varicocele and varicocele-related testicular at- rophy in Turkish children and adolescents. BJU Int 2000; 86: 490-93.
4. Gorelick JI, and Goldstein M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 613-16.
5. Schiff J, Kelly C, Goldstein M, Schelgel P, Poppas D. Mana- ging varicoceles in children: results with microsurgical va- ricocelectomy. BJU Int 2005; 95:399-402.
6. Cozzolino DJ, Lipschultz LI. Varicocele as a progressive le- sion: positive effect of varicocele repair.Human Reprod Up- date 2001; 7: 55-8.
7. Paduch D, Niedzielski J. Repair versus observation in ado- lescent varicocele: a prospective study. J Urol 1997; 158: 1128-32.
8. Pryor JL, Howards SS. Varicocele. Urol Clin North Am 1987; 14: 499-513.

9. Skoog SJ, Roberts KP, Goldstein M, Pryor JL. The adolescent varicocele: what’s new with an old problem in young pati- ents? Pediatrics 1997; 100: 112-22.
10. Kass EJ, Belman AB. Reversal of testicular growth failure by varicocele ligation. J Urol 1987; 137:475-6.
11. Cayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M ve ark. The effect of varicocele repair on testicular volume in children and adolescents with varicocele. J Urol 2002; 168: 731-4.
12. Laven JS, Haans LC, Mali WP, te Velde ER, Wensing CJ, Ei- mers JM. Effects of varicocele treatment in adolescents: a randomized study.Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 756-62.
13. Okuyama A, Nakamura M, Namiki M. ve ark. Surgical re- pair of varicocele at puberty: preventive treatment for ferti- lity improvement.J Urol 1988; 139: 562-4.
14. Preston MA, Carnat T, Flood T, Gaboury I, Leonard MP. Conservative Management of Adolescent Varicoceles: A Retrospective Review. Urology 2008; 72 : 77-80.
15. Bong GW, Koo HP. The adolescent varicocele: to treat or not to treat. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 509-15.
16. Reinberg O, Meyrat BJ. Children and adolescent varicocele. Rev Med Suisse 2007; 136: 2779-82.
17. Shiraishi K, Takihara H, Matsuyama H. Effects of grade 1 varicocele detected in the pediatric age group on testicular development. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44: 1995-8.