Anorektal hastalığı olan hastalarda transrektal prostat biyopsisi için yapılan kaudal blok ve intrarektal jel anestezilerinin etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Giriş: Anorektal hastalığı olan TRUS eşliğinde prostat biyopsisi yapılan hastalarda kaudal blok ve intrarektal jel anestezisinin analjezik etkinliğini karşılaştırdık.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya anorektal hastalığı olan ve TRUS eşliğinde biyopsi yapılan toplam 100 hasta alındı. Kaudal grupta 15 ml lidocaine %1 lidocaine kaudal boşluğa uygulandı 50 hasta ve intrarektal grupta prostat biyopsisinden 15 dakika önce 15 cc %2 lidocaine jel intrarektal olarak uygulandı 50 hasta . Anestezi işlemi sırasında, prob yerleştirme sırasında ve prostat biyopsisi sırasında ağrı skorunun ölçmek için hastanın kendi yaptığı visual analog skala VAS uygulandı.Bulgular: Prob yerleştirme sırasında ve prostat biyopsi sırasında ölçülen ortalama VAS skorları Grup 1’de Grup 2’ye göre daha düşüktü p

Keywords

• Kaudal blok,intrarektal jel,prostat biyopsisi,visuel analog skala

Comparison of the caudal block anesthesia and ıntrarectal gel anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal disorders

Abstract

Objective: We compared the analgesic efficacy of the caudal block anesthesia and intrarectal gel anesthesia for TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in patients with anorectal disorders.Materials and Methods: A total of 100 patients which had anorectal disorders undergoing biopsy were entered into this study. 15 ml of lidocaine 1% lidocaine was into the caudal space in caudal group first 50 patients and 15 cc 2% lidocaine gel were applied intrarectally in intrarectal gel group last 50 patients 10 minutes before the prostate biopsy. A self-administration visual analogue scale VAS was used to assess the pain score during anesthesia, during probe insertion and during prostate biopsy.Results: The mean VAS score during the probe insertion and during the prostate biopsies is lower in group 1 than group 2, p

Keywords

• Caudal block,intrarectal gel,prostate biopsy,visual analog scale

References

1. Seymour H, Perry MJ, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anaesthesia. BJU Int 2001; 88:540-544.
2. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Doré B, Aubert J. Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79:608-610.
3. Cevik I, Dillioglugil O, Zisman A, Akdas A. Combined “pe- riprostatic and periapical” local anesthesia is not superior to “periprostatic” anesthesia alone in reducing pain during Tru-Cut prostate biopsy. Urology 2006; 68:1215-1219.
4. Ikuerowo SO, Popoola AA, Olapade-Olaopa EO, et al. Cau- dal block anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Int Urol Nephrol 2010; 42:19-22.
5. Adebamowo CA, Ladipo JK, Ajao OG. Randomized com- parison of agents for caudal anaesthesia in anal surgery. Br J Surg 1996; 83:364-365.
6. Adebamowo CA. Caudal anaesthesia in the clinical as- sessment of painful anal lesions. Afr J Med Med Sci 2000; 29:133-134.
7. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, Shinohara K. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systema- tic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1996; 155:607-609.
8. Aus G, Hermansson CG, Hugosson J, Pedersen KV. Trans- rectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complicati- ons and acceptance by patients. Br J Urol 1993; 71:457-459.

9. Chang SS, Alberts G, Wells N, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS. Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: re- sults of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J Urol 2001; 166:2178-2180.
10. Kravchick S, Yoffe B, Cytron S. Modified perianal/pericap- sular anesthesia for transrectal biopsy of prostate in patients with anal rectal problems. Urology 2007; 69:139-141.
11. Kabay S, Yucel M, Sahin L, Yaylak F, Aydin T. Caudal block anaesthesia for transrectal biopsy of prostate in patients with anal rectal disorders. Central European Journal of Uro- logy 2009; 62;18-20.
12. Rodríguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of trans- rectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a pros- pective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1998: 160:2115-2120.
13. Peters JL, Thompson AC, McNicholas TA, Hines JE, Han- bury DC, Boustead GB. Increased patient satisfaction from transrectal ultrasonography and biopsy under sedation. BJU Int 2001; 87:827-830.
14. Desgrandchamps F, Meria P, Irani J, Desgrippes A, Teillac P, Le Duc A. The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study. BJU Int 1999; 83:1007-1009.
15. Soloway MS, Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000; 163:172-173.
16. Adsan O, Inal G, Ozdoğan L, Kaygisiz O, Uğurlu O, Cetin- kaya M. Unilateral pudendal nerve blockade for relief of all pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Urology 2004; 64:528-531.
17. Obek C, Ozkan B, Tunc B, Can G, Yalcin V, Solok V. Com- parison of 3 different methods of anesthesia before trans- rectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2004; 172:502-505.
18. Aus G, Damber JE, Hugosson J. Prostate biopsy and anaest- hesia: an overview. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2005; 39:124-129.
19. Inal G, Adsan O, Ugurlu O, Kaygisiz O, Kosan M, Cetinka- ya M. Comparison of four different anesthesia methods for relief of all pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided pros- tate biopsy. Int Urol Nephrol 2008; 40:335-339.
20. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T, et al. A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during trans- rectal prostate biopsy: the Emory University experience. J Urol 2000; 164:397-399.
21. Stirling BN, Shockley KF, Carothers GG, Maatman TJ. Comparison of local anesthesia techniques during trans- rectal ultrasound-guided biopsies. Urology 2002; 60:89-92.
22. Alavi AS, Soloway MS, Vaidya A, Lynne CM, Gheiler EL. Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods. J Urol 2001; 166:1343-1345.
23. Mallick S, Humbert M, Braud F, Fofana M, Blanchet P. Local anesthesia before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate bi- opsy: comparison of 2 methods in a prospective, randomi- zed clinical trial. J Urol 2004; 171:730-733.
24. Verghese ST, Mostello LA, Patel RI, Kaplan RF, Patel KM. Testing anal sphincter tone predicts the effectiveness of cau- dal analgesia in children. Anesth Analg 2002; 94:1161-1164, table of contents.
25. Zito SJ. Adult caudal anesthesia: a reexamination of the technique. AANA J 1993; 61:153-157.
26. Horinaga M, Nakashima J, Nakanoma T. Efficacy compared between caudal block and periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy. Uro- logy 2006; 68:348-351.