Pediatrik taş hastalarında “Mini-perc’’ deneyimlerimiz

Year 2014, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 20 - 23, 01.05.2014

Volkan Tuğcu¹ Abdulmuttalip Şimşek² Selçuk Şahin¹ Buğra Doğukan Törer¹ Taner Kargı¹ Ali İhsan Taşçı¹

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada staghorn komplet veya parsiyel ve böbrek pelvis taşları olan pediatrik yaş grubundaki hastalara uyguladığımız miniperkütan nefrolititomi sonuçlarımız sunulmuştur.Hastalar ve Yöntem: Kliniğimizde Haziran 2008 ve Ocak 2013 tarihleri arasında, yaşları 3 ile 13 arasında değişen, 36 hasta kız:16, erkek:20 böbrek taşı nedeni ile miniperc ile tedavi edildi. Onüç hastada 36,1% komplet staghorn, on hastada 27,8% parsiyel staghorn onüç hastada 36,1% pelvis taşları mevcuttu. Ortalama taş yükü 192 mm² 96-310 mm² idi. Bütün girişimler 22 f sheath içinden yapıldı. Skopi altında tek giriş ile toplayıcı sisteme girilerek, kılavuz tel üzerinden dilatasyon işlemi gerçekleştirildi. İşlem sırasında pnömatik litotriptör ve Holmiyum:Yag lazer kullanıldı. Ulaşılamayan kaliks taşlarına fleksibl nefroskop ile müdahele edildi. 26 hastaya 10F nefrostomi tüpü, 10 hastaya ise 14F nefrostomi tüpü yerleştirildi. Bulgular: Ortalama operasyon zamanı 82 dk 44-112 dk , Ortalama hematokrit değerlerindeki düşüş %3,1 düzeyindeydi ve hiçbir hastaya kan transfüzyonu yapılmadı. Nefrostominin çekilme süresi 29 saatti. Ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 2.3 1,5-3 gün gündü. 30 %83,3 hastada taşsızlık sağlandı. 6 %16,7 hastada kalan rezidüel taşlar ESWL yöntemi ile tedavi edildi. Olguların hiç birinde bir komplikasyon gözlenmedi. Sonuç: Pediatrik yaş grubu hastalarda mini-perkütan nefrolitotomi etkili ve güvenli bir şekilde kullanılabilir

Keywords

Mini-perc , Pediatrik , Taş

Our “miniperc’’ experiences in children

Abstract

Purpose: We present our experience with mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy miniperc for staghorn complet or partial and renal pelvic calculi in children. Patıents and Methods: Between June 2008 and January 2013, 36 patients 20 boys and 16 girls , aged 3 and 13 years-old, were treated with miniperc because of renal stone in our clinic. There were complet staghorn calculi in 13 patients, partial staghorn calculi in 10 patients and renal pelvic calculi in 13 patients. The average bulk of the stones was 192 mm² range: 96-310 mm² . All procedures have been performed with the 22 f sheath. Tract dilation and insertion of the sheath into the collecting system was performed with a single pass over an access wire under x ray scopy. Operation was performed using pneumatic lithotriptor and Holmiyum:Yag laser. Unreachable caliceal stones were reached and fragmanted with the help of flexible nephroscope. We put 10 f nephrostomy tubes to 26 patients and 14 f nephrostomy tubes to 10 patients.Results: Mean procedure time was 82 minutes, mean decreasing of hematocrit values was % 3,1, and length of hospitalization was 2.3 days, respectively. 30 83,3% of 36 patients are currently stone free. Six patients %16,7 , had residual calcules were treated with ESWL. No patient required transfusion, developed urosepsis, or had a procedure-related complication.Conclusıons: Mini -percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and effective in children, and should be considered a viable management option

References

• Tellaloğlu S, Ander H. Stones in children. Turk J Pediatr 1984; 26:51-60.
• Remzi D, Çakmak F, Erkan I. A study on urolithiasis inci- dence in Turkish school-age children. J Urol 1980; 123:608.
• Schultz-Lampel D. and Lampel A. The surgical manage- ment of stones in children. BJU Int 2001; 87:732-740.
• Sahin A, Tekgül S, Erdem E, Ekici S, Hasçiçek M, Kendi S. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in older children. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35:1336-1338.
• Zeren S, Satar N, Bayazit Y, Bayazit AK, Payasli K, Ozkeçeli R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi. J Endourol 2002; 16:75-78.
• Sakallıoğlu O, Hacıhamdioğlu B, Kalman S, Gök F. Evalua- tion of demographic aspects and management of pediatric urolithiasis patients. J Gulhane Med 2007; 49: 137-140.
• Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 1998;16:371-374.
• Güven S, İstanbulluoğlu O, Öztürk A, Öztürk B, Pişkin, M, Çicek T, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is highly effi- cient and safe in infants and children under 3 years of age. Urol Int 2010; 85:455-60.
• Mor Y, Elmasry YE, Kellett MJ, Duffy PG. The role of per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediat- ric renal calculi. J Urol 1997; 158:1319-1321.
• Woodside JR, Stevens GF, Stark GL, Borden TA, Ball WS. Percutaneous stone removal in children. J Urol 1985; 134:1166-1177.
• Ünsal A. Çocuklarda böbrek taşı tedavisinde perkütan nef- rolitotomi. Endoüroloji Bülteni 2008;4:1-6.
• Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Gras- so M, Gutierrez-Aceves J, et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of SWL and PNL for lower pole nephro- lithiasis initial results. J Urol 2001; 166:2072-2080.
• Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Elashry OM, Smith DS, McDougall EM, et al. Lower caliceal stone cle- arance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 1998; 159:676-82.
• Özden E, Şahin A, Tan B, Doğan HS, Eren MT, Tekgül S. Percutaneous renal surgery in children with complex sto- ne. J Pediatr Urol 2008; 4:295-298.
• R. Kapoor, F. Solanki, P. Singhania, M. Andankar, H. Pat- hak. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric population. J Endourol 2008; 22: 637-640.
• Helal M, Black T, Lockhart J, Figueroa TE. The Hick- man peel-away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutane- ous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 1997; 11:171-172.
• Monga M, Ogleive S. Minipercutaneous nephrolitho- tomy. J Endourol 2000; 14:419-421.
• G. Erdenetsesteg G, T. Manohar, H. Singh, MR Desai. En- dourological management of pediatric urolithiasis: Propo- sed clinical guidelines. J Endourol 2006; 20: 737-748.
• Desai M, Ridhorkar V, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. Pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessing impact of tech- nical innovations on safety and efficacy. J Endourol 1999; 13:359-364.