Obesity and percutaneous nephrolithotomy PNL : The effect of body mass index on PNL outcomes

Year 2015, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 26 - 31, 01.05.2015

Özgü Aydoğdu İbrahim Halil Bozkurt Tarık Yonguç Tansu Değirmenci Salih Polat Volkan Şen Zafer Kozacıoğlu Bülent Günlüsoy Süleyman Minareci

Abstract

Objective: In the present study we aimed to investigate the potential effect of obesity on postoperative outcomes and complications in patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy PNL . Materials and Methods: 428 patients who underwent PNL in our clinic between 2009 and 2014 were included in our study. Patients were evaluated in 4 groups according to body mass index BMI . Group 1 included normal weight BMI 30 kg/m2 and group 4 included morbidly obese BMI >40 kg/m2 patients. Postoperative success was defined as stone free or residual fragments < 3mm. Four groups were compared for operation time, intraoperative bleeding, floroscopy time, hospitalization time, postoperative analgesic requirement, nephrostomy time, postoperative success rates, blood transfusion, and other major and minor complications. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 17.0 and statistical significance was set at a p value of

Keywords

PNL , obesity , renal stone , urolithiasis , body mass index

Obezite ve perkütan nefrolitotomi PNL : Vücut kitle indeksinin PNL sonuçları üzerindeki etkisi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada obezitenin perkütan nefrolitotomi PNL yapılan hastalarda postoperatif sonuçlar ve komplikasyonlar üzerindeki potansiyel etkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmaya kliniğimizde 2009 ve 2014 yılları arasında PNL gerçekleştirilen ve kayıtlarına ulaşılabilen 428 hasta dahil edildi. Hastalar obezite değerlendirilmesi açısından vücut kitle indeksine VKİ göre dört grupta incelendi. Grup 1’ de normal kilolu VKİ 40 kg/m2 olan hastalar yer aldı. Taşların tamamen temizlenmesi veya

Keywords

PNL , obezite , böbrek taşı , ürolitiazis , vücut kitle indeksi

References

• Koo BC, Burtt G and Burgess NA. Percutaneous stone surgery in the obese: outcome stratified according to body mass index. BJU Int 2004; 93: 1296-1299.
• Fuller A, Razvi H, Denstedt JD, Nott L, Hendrix A, Luke M, Pal SK, Rosette J. The clinical research office of the en- dourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: outcomes in the morbidly obese patient-a case cont- rol analysis. CUAJ 2014; 8: 393-397.
• El-Asmy AM, Shokeir AA, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR, El-Kappany HA. Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effect of body mass index. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 199-205.
• Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, et al. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes 2008;32:1431-7.
• Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 2005;68:1230-5.
• Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC. Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 2005;293:455-62.
• Thomas R, Cass AS. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 1993;150:30–2.
• Calverta RC, Burgess NA. Urolithiasis and obesity: me- tabolic and technical considerations. Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:113–7.
• Choban PS, Flancbaum L. The impact of obesity on surgi- cal outcomes: a review. J Am Coll Surg 1997; 185: 593-603.
• Nguyen TA, Belis JA. Endoscopic management of urolithi- asis in the morbidly obese patient. J Endourol 1998;12:33– 5.
• Andreoni C, Afane J, Olweny E, Clayman RV. Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: first-line therapy for proximal ureteral and renal calculi in the morbidly obese and supe- robese patient. J Endourol 2001;15:493–8.
• Dash A, Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, Wolf Jr JS. Ureteroscopic treatment of renal calculi in morbidly obese patients: a stone-matched comparison. Urology 2002;60:393–7.
• Manohar T, Jain P, Desai M. Supine percutaneous neph- rolithotomy: effective approach to high risk and morbidly obese patients. J Endourol 2007;21:44-9.
• Gofrit ON, Shapiro A, Donchin Y, et al. Lateral decubitus position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the mor- bidly obese or kyphotic patient. J Endourol 2002;16:383–6.
• Curtis R, Thorpe AC, Marsh R. Modification of the tech- nique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the morbidly obese patient. Br J Urol 1997;79:138–40.
• Giblin JG, Lossef S, Pahira JJ. A modification of standard percutaneous nephrolithotripsy technique for the mor- bidly obese patient. Urology 1995;46:491–3.
• Carson III CC, Danneberger JE, Weinerth JL. Percutane- ous lithotripsy in morbid obesity. J Urol 1988;139:243–5.
• El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, El-Nahas AR, et al. Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effect of body mass in- dex. Eur Urol 2007;52:199-205.
• Faerber GJ, Goh M. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese patient. Tech Urol 1997;3:89–95.
• Streem SB, Yost A, Mascha E. Clinical implications of cli- nically insignificant stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 1996; 155: 1186-1190.
• Torrecilla Ortiz C, Meza Martínez AI et al. Obesity in per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy. Is body mass index really im- portant? Urology 2014;84:538-43.
• Kuntz NJ, Neisius A, Astroza GM et al. Does body mass index impact the outcomes of tubeless percutaneous neph- rolithotomy? BJU Int 2014;114:404-11.