Termokoterle Yapılan Sünnet Sonrası Gelişen Fimozisin Tedavisinde Topikal Steroid Kremin Etkinliği

Year 2020, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 182 - 188, 27.10.2020

Osman Akyüz , Mehmet Bodakçı Zeynep Tatar Müslüm Ergün Soner Coban , Haydar Kamil Çam

https://doi.org/10.33719/yud.682146

Abstract

Amaç: Termokoter cihazı, hızlı ve güvenli sünnet için lokal anestezi altında yapılan sünnetlerde ülkemizde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Termokoterle sünnet sonrası gelişebilecek komplikasyonlardan bir tanesi de patolojik fimozdur. Ancak literatürde bu komplikasyonun medikal tedavisi ile ilgili çalışma yoktur. Termokoterle sünnet sonrası gelişen patolojik fimozisin tedavisinde topikal kortikosteroid uygulamasının etkinliğini araştırmayı amaçladık.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2009 ile 2018 yılları arasında, hastanemizde uygulanan sünnetler sonrası sekonder fimozis gelişen, yaşları 1-8 arasında değişen 68 hastanın verileri bilgisayardan retrospektif incelendi. Termokoter ve bistüri kullanılarak yapılan sünnetlerden sonra gelişen fimozis vakaları iki ayrı gruba ayrılarak topikal steroid tedavisinin etkinliği değerlendirildi.

Bulgular: Termokoterle sünnet sonrası grade 5 fimozis gelişen 32 vaka da steroid tedavisine hiçbir yanıt alınamadı. Grade 4 fimozis gelişen gelişen 16 vakanın üç tanesinde kısmi yanıt alınsa da, bu 48 vakanın tamamına cerrahi düzeltme yapıldı. Bistüri grubunda ise grade 5 fimozis gelişen dört vakada da steroide yanıt alınamazken, grade 4 fimozis gelişen sekiz vakanın dört (%50) tanesinde ve grade 3 fimozis gelişen sekiz vakanın altı (%75) tanesinde steroide yanıt alınarak full retraksiyon sağlandı. Bu grupta toplam on vakaya cerrahi müdahale yapıldı.

Sonuç: Sünnet sonrası gelişen patolojik fimozis durumlarında da topikal steroid kremler kısmen fayda sağlayabilir. Ancak termokoter kullanımı sonrası gelişen yüksek dereceli fimozis vakalarında etkinlik gösterememektedirler.

Keywords

Koter , sünnet , fimozis , topikal steorid

The Effectiveness of Topical Steroid Cream in the Management of Phimosis Developed Following Circumcision Performed With Thermocautery

Abstract

Objective: In our country, thermocautery device is used extensively for circumcision performed under local anesthesia for fast and safe circumcision. One of the complications that may occur after circumcision with thermocautery is pathological phimosis. However, there aren’t studies in the literature regarding the medical treatment of pathological phimosis after circumcision with thermocautery. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of topical corticosteroid application in the treatment of pathological phimosis developed after circumcision with thermocautery.

Material&Methods: Data of 68 patients (aged: 1-8 years) who developed phimosis secondary to circumcisions performed by one surgeon between the years 2009 and 2018 were analysed retrospectively from a computerised database. Cases of phimosis developed after circumcisions performed using thermocautery and scalpel were analysed in two separate groups, and the effectiveness of topical steroid treatment was evaluated.

Results: In the thermocautery group, 32 patients who developed Grade 5 phimosis didn’t respond to steroid therapy, while only three of 16 (18.75%) cases with Grade 4 phimosis responded partially to topical steroid treatment. All these 48 cases were treated with surgery. In the scalpel group, no therapeutic response was elicited in four cases who developed Grade 5 phimosis. However, four out of eight (50%) patients with Grade 4 and six out of eight (75%) patients with Grade 3 phimosis responded to steroid therapy, and full retraction of the foreskin was achieved. In the scalpel group, ten cases underwent surgical revision.

Conclusion: Topical steroid creams may be partially beneficial in cases of pathological phimosis after circumcision. However, they do not show efficacy in cases of high-grade phimosis after thermocautery use.

Keywords

Cautery , circumcision , phimosis , topical steorid

References

• 1. Moreno G, Corbalán J, Peñaloza B, Pantoja T. Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 9. Art. No: CD008973. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008973.pub2. 2. Akyüz O, Bodakçi MN, Tefekli AH, Thermal cautery-assisted circumcision and principles of its use to decrease complication rates. J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Jan; 19. pii: S1477-5131(19)30005-1. 3. Nascimento FJ, Pereira RF, Silva JL, Tavares A, Pompeo AC. Topical Betamethasone and Hyaluronidase in the Treatment of Phimosis in Boys: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo controlled Trial. Int Braz J Urol 2011 May-Jun; 37(3):314-319. 4. Zampieri N, Corroppolo M, Camoglio FS, Giacomello L, Ottolenghi A. Phimosis: stretching methods with or without application of topical steroids? J Pediatr 2005 Nov; 147(5):705-6. 5. Alpert SA, Ching CB, DaJusta DG, McLeod DJ, Fuchs ME, Jayanthi VR. Combination treatment for cicatrix after neonatal circumcision. An Office based solution to a challenging problem. J Pediatr Urol 2018; 14(5): 471-475. 6. Abdulwahab-Ahmed A, Mungadi IA. Techniques of Male Circumcision. J Surg Tech Case Rep 2013 Jan-Jun; 5(1): 1–7. 7. Kikiros CS, Beasley SW, Woodward AA. The response of phimosis to local steroid application. Pediatr Surg Int 1993; 8: 329–32. 8. Dunsmuir WD, Gordon EM. The History of Circumcision. BJU International 1999; 83: 1–12. 9. Krill AJ, Palmer LS, Palmer JS. Complications of circumcision. Scientific World Journal 2011; 11: 2458-68. 10. Talini C, Antunes LA, Carvalho BC, et al. Circumcision: postoperative complications that required reoperation. Einstein (São Paulo) 2018; 16(3):1-5. 11. Shahid SK. Phimosis in children. ISRN Urol 2012; 4(1): 32–39. 12. Balamtekin N, Uluocak N, Atay A, Aydın HI, Karabıyık I. The effect of topical corticosteroid creams on phimosis treatment. Erciyes Medical Journal 2006; 28(3): 120–24. 13. Golubovic Z, Milanovic D, Vukadinovic V, Rakıc I, Perovic S . The conservative treatment of phimosis in boys. Brit J Urol 1996; 78: 786–88. 14. Findling JW, Doppman JL. Biochemical and radiologic diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1994; 23: 511–37. 15. Ashfield JE, Nickel KR, Siemens DR, Macneily AE, Nickel JC. Treatment of phimosis with topical steroids in 194 children. J Urol 2003; 169: 1106–08. 16. Kuehhas FE, Miernik A, Sevcenco S, Tosev G, Weibl P, Schoenthaler M, Lassmann J. Predictive power of objectivation of phimosis grade on outcomes of topical 0.1% betamethasone treatment of phimosis. Urology 2012; 80: 412–16. 17. Esposito C, Centonze A, Alicchio F, Savanelli A, Settimi A. Topical Steroid Application versus Circumcision in Pediatric Patients with Phimosis: A Prospective Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial. World Journal of Urology 2008; 26:187–90. 18. Lee CH. Lee SD. Effect of topical steroid (0.05% clobetasol propionate) treatment in children with severe phimosis. Korean J Urol 2013; 54(9): 624–30. 19. Kiss A, Csontai A, Pirót L, Nyirády P, Merksz M, Király L. The response of balanitis xerotica obliterans to local steroid application compared with placebo in children. J Urol. 2001 Jan; 165(1): 219-20. 20. Makhija D, Shah H, Tiwari C, Dwiwedi P, Gandhi S. Outcome of topical steroid application in children with non-retractile prepuce. Dev period med 2018; 22, 1: 71-4. 21. Favorito LA, Balassiano CM, Rosado JP, Cardoso LEM, Costa WS, Sampaio FJB. Structural analysis of the phimotic prepuce in patients with failed topical treatment compared with untreated phimosis. Int Braz J Urol 2012; 38: 802-8.