American Mandate Discussed in the Sivas Congress
Abstract
After the Mondros ceasefire agreement, due to the decadent situation of the Ottoman Empire and the economic crisis; the commanders including Mustafa Kemal, who were disturbed in this situation, organized congresses in Anatolia as a result of the sovereignty of the Entente States on all sides of the country. The main purpose of these congresses is to gather all the Anatolian people and the communities that resist against all these invasions. Thus, these congresses are in an effort to show resistance in a stronger way. With this purpose, Entente States and the states that is established or planned to be founded by minorities, are tried to stave beyond the borders of the Misak-ı Milli. In addition to this main topic and above at the Sivas Congress, the subject of the American Mandate, which is more attention-grabbing and causes long debate in the congress has also been underlined. As a result of the American Mandate which were expressed on the basis of the Wilson Principles, that explains the rule under American patronage until the completion of development of a state. At this point, a letter sent to the American Senate. Although the mandate was initially planned by a wide range of people, it faded into background due to the afterwards events in Turkish War of Independence. Therefore, the mandate idea was also invalidated by the fact that Wilson was replaced by a new president, and clear steps were not taken between American and Turkish councils. As a result of these decisions that are revealed in Sivas Congress, people are gathered for the national resistance against occupation and it revealed today's Turkey.
Keywords
References
- Fshazi, F. (2008). 2. Meşrutiyet ve Arnavutluk'ta Osmanlı Algısı: Arnavutlarla Osmanlı'nın Düşman Olduğu ''O An''. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, (38), 161-178.
- Mete, Ş. (1998). Trablusgarp Savaşı ve İtalya'nın Akdeniz'deki Faaliyetler. Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (8), 261-292.
- Atabay, M. (2015). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu hizmetinde Breslau (Midilli) Kruvazörü. Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı, 13(18), 117-129.
- Erikan, C. (2008). Kurtuluş Savaşı Tarihi. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.
- Karabekir, K. (1969). İstiklâl Harbimiz. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
- Atatürk, M. K. (1989). Nutuk. Ankra: Türk Tarihi Kurumu Yayınları.
- Boyacıoğlu, R. (2008). Erzurum’dan Sivas Kongresi’ne. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi e-Dergisi, 1-9
- ATAŞE, Atatürk Özel Arşivi, Kls. 17, Dos. 38-1A-50, Fih. 4-18. (ATAŞE: Askeri Tarih ve Stratejik Etütler Başkanlığı).
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Onur Yel
Türkiye
Publication Date
June 30, 2018
Submission Date
May 31, 2018
Acceptance Date
July 3, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 2 Number: 4