Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cholesteatoma

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3, 180 - 184, 18.12.2018

A. Secil Kayalı Dinç , Lale Damgacı Melih Çayönü Deniz Sözmen Cılız Süleyman Boynueğri M. Melih Şahin H. Gül Hatipoğlu T. Naciye Dogan Adil Eryilmaz

https://doi.org/10.32448/entupdates.508078

Öz

Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted images in patients with cholesteatoma.

Methods: We compared the preoperative MRI findings and intraoperative microscopic examination findings in 54 patients who were operated on due to a pre-diagnosis of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma, according to preoperative microscopic ear examination, temporal bone computed tomography (CT) and ear MRI.

Results: Fifty-four patients (18 female and 36 male) were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 36.8 ± 17.3 (range: 6-67). Thirty-one patients had primary surgery, whereas 23 patients had revision surgery to the affected ear (for 19 patients, the second, for 3, the third, and for 1, the 5th operation).We found that the sensitivity of pre-operative MRI for detecting cholesteatoma was 97.7%, the specificity was 77.8%, and the diagnostic accuracy rate was 94.4%. The rate of false negatives in MRI with diffusion-weighted images was found to be 4% in primary cases, whereas the false negativity rate with this technique was found to be 0% for revision cases.

Conclusion: We concluded that ear MRI examination with diffusion-weighted images is a significant diagnostic tool, to be used alongside preoperative history and physical examination in deciding on whether to operate, especially in patients for whom revision surgery of the ear (due to recurrent, residual, iatrogenic cholesteatoma, or squamous epithelium) is plnned

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cholesteatoma, Magnetic resonance imaging, sensitivity, specificity

Kaynakça

• 1. Aikele P, Kittner T, Offergeld C, Kaftan H, Hüttenbrink KB, Laniado M. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of cholesteatoma in pediatric and adult patients who have undergone middle ear surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:261-5. Doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.1.1810261
• 2. Uzun C. Kolesteatom. Türkiye Klinikleri Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Kulak Burun Boğaz Dergisi 2005;1:128-34.
• 3. Olszewska E, Wagner M, Bernal-Sprekelsen M et al. Etiopathogenesis of cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2004;261:6-24. Doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0623-x
• 4. Atsushi F, Morita S, Harada T et al. Value of T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cholesteatoma detection. Otol Neurotol 2017; 38:1440-4. Doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001558.
• 5. Tierney PA, Pracy P, Blaney SP, Bowdler DA. An assessment of the value of the preoperative computed tomography scans prior to otoendoscopic ‘second look’ in intact canal wall mastoid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1999;24:274-6. Doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1999.00238.x
• 6. Vanden Abeele D, Coen E, Parizel PM, Van de Heyning P. Can MRI replace a second look operation in cholesteatoma surgery? Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:555-61. Doi: 10.1080/00016489950180784
• 7. Kimitsuki T, Suda Y, Kawano H, Tono T, Komune S. Correlation between MRI findings and second-look operation in cholesteatoma surgery. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2001;63:291-3. Doi: 10.1159/000055760
• 8. Baráth K, Huber AM, Stämpfli P, Varga Z, Kollias S. Neuroradiology of cholesteatomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:221-9. Doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2052
• 9. Blaney SP, Tierney P, Oyarazabal M, Bowdler DA. CT scanning in “second look” combined approach tympanoplasty. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2000;121:79-81.
• 10. Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Pouillon M, Somers T, Casselman J, Offeciers E. The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1461-7. Doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0160-2
• 11. Stasolla A, Magliulo G, Parrotto D, Luppi G, Marini M. Detection of postoperative relapsing/ residual cholesteatomas with diffusion weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:879-84.
• 12. Li PM, Linos E, Gurgel RK, Fischbein NJ, Blevins NH. Evaluating the utility of non echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2013;123(5): 1247-50. Doi: 10.1002/lary.23759
• 13. Lingam RK, Bassett P. A Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Performance of Non-Echoplanar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Detecting Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: 10 Years On. 2017 38(4):521-8. Doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001353