Öğretmenlerin Saldırgan İletişiminin Öğrencilerin Duyuşsal Öğrenmelerine ve Strateji Kullanımlarına Etkisi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Yabancı Dil Olarak İngilizce (YDİ) öğretmenlerinin saldırgan iletişim biçimleri ve öğrencilerin duyuşsal öğrenme ve strateji kullanımları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya Yunanca konuşan ve YDİ lisans öğrencisi olan, 1823 yaşları arasında ( =20.3±.68) 148 öğrenci (39 erkek ve 109 kadın) katılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre YDİ öğretmenlerinin sözlü saldırganlıkları, tartışmacı olma durumları ile negatif yönlü ilişkilidir. Aynı zamanda regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre öğretmenlerin algılanan sözlü saldırganlıkları ve tartışmacı olma durumları, öğrencilerin duyuşsal öğrenmeleri, sosyal ve duyuşsal strateji kullanımları değişkenlerini anlamlı düzeyde yordayabilmektedir. Bahsedilen bulgular ışığında, öğretmenlerin sözlü saldırganlıklarının öğrencilerin duygularına, dolayısıyla öğrenme süreçlerine, olumsuz etkilerinin olabileceği sonucuna ulaşılabilir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• YDİ öğrenme ve öğretme, saldırgan davranış, sosyal ve duyuşsal strateji kullanımı

The Influence of Teacher Aggressive Communication on Student Affective Learning and Strategy Use

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationships among perceived English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers’ aggressive communication and students’ affective learning and strategy use. 148 Greek-speaking EFL undergraduate students (39 males and 109 females), 18-23 years old (M=20.3±.68) participated in the study. According to the results of the study, perceived EFL teachers’ verbal aggressiveness was negatively related to their argumentativeness and students’ social and affective strategy use and affective learning. Simultaneously, the results of the regression analysis revealed that perceived teachers’ verbal aggressiveness and argumentativeness could significantly predict the variables of students’ affective learning, social and affective strategy use. In the light of the aforementioned findings, it can be concluded that teachers’ verbal aggressiveness can have a negative impact on students’ feelings, which can, in turn, affect their learning process

Keywords

• EFL learning and teaching, aggressive behavior, social and affective strategy use

References

1. Bekiari, A. (2012). Perceptions of instructors‟ verbal aggressiveness and physical edu- cation students‟ affective learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115, 325-335.
2. Bekiari, Α. (2014). Verbal Aggressiveness and Leadership Style of Sports Instructors and Their Relationshipd with Athletes‟ Intrisic Motivation. Creative Education, 5(2), 114-121.
3. Bekiari, A., Digelidis, N. (2015). Measuring verbal aggressiveness in sport and education. International Journal of Physical Education, 52(4), 112-121.
4. Bekiari, A., Hasanagas, N. (2015). Verbal aggressiveness exploration through
5. complete social network analysis: using physical education students‟ class as an illus- tration. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(3), 30-49.
6. Bekiari, A., Kokaridas, D., Sakellariou, K. (2005). Verbal aggressiveness of physical education teachers and students‟ self-reports of behaviour. Psychological Re- ports, 96, 493-498.
7. Bekiari, A., Kokaridas, D., Sakellariou, K. (2006). Associations of students‟ self- reports of their teacher‟s verbal aggression, intrinsic motivation, and perceptions of reasons for discipline in Greek physical education classes. Psychological Re- ports, 98, 451-461.
8. Bekiari A., Perkos S., Gerodimos V. (2015). Verbal aggression in basketball:

9. perceived coach use and athlete intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15 (1), 16, 96 – 102.
10. Bekiari, A., Syrmpas, I. (2015). The influence of motivational climate and coaches‟
11. verbal aggression on athletes‟ satisfaction. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 9, 318-329.
12. Celani, M. A. A. (2008). When myth and reality meet: Reflections on ESP in Brazil. English for Specific Purposes, 27(4), 412-423.
13. Çelik, A. Y., & Kılıç, Z. (2014). The Impact of Argumentation on High School
14. Chemistry Students‟ Conceptual Understanding, Attitude towards Chemistry and Ar- gumentativeness. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 6(1).
15. Chamot, A.U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruc- tion. Foreign Language Annals, 22(1), 13-24.
16. Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London and New York: Longman.
17. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues to adulthood and old age. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds). Life-span development and behavior. New York: Academic Press.
18. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students‟ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genet- ics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133-148.
20. Dolin, D. J. (1995). An alternative form of teacher affinity‐seeking measurement. Communication Research Reports, 12(2), 220-226.
21. Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students' collaborative argu- mentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teach- ing, 50(2), 209-237.
22. Fandiño, Y. (2010). Explicit teaching of socio-affective language learning strategies to beginner EFL students. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 15(24), 145-169.
23. Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 133-144.
24. Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (1998). Does making content relevant make a difference in learning?. Communication Research Reports, 15(2), 121-129.
25. Goh, C., & Kwah, P.F. (1997). Chinese ESL students‟ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 39-53.
26. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
27. Guerrero, L. K., & Gross, M. A. (2014). Argumentativeness, Avoidance, Verbal
28. Aggressiveness, and Verbal Benevolence as Predictors of Partner Perceptions of an Individual's Conflict Style. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 7(2), 99-120.
29. Hamilton, M., & Hample, D. (2011). Testing hierarchical models of
30. argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(3), 250-273.
31. Harish, S. (2014). Social strategy use and language learning contexts: A case study of Malayalee undergraduate students in India. System, 43, 64-73.
32. Hasanagas, N., & Bekiari, A. (2015). Depicting Determinants and Effects of Intimacy and Verbal Aggressiveness Target through Social Network Analysis. Sociology Mind, 5(3), 162.
33. Horn, R. (2002). Coupled movements in voltage-gated ion channels. The Journal of general physiology, 120(4), 449-453.
34. Infante, D. A. (1987). Aggressiveness. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Per- sonality and interpersonal communication (pp. 157–192). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35. Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1996). Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: A review of recent theory and research. In B.R. Burleson (Ed.) Communication yearbook, 19 (pp.319-351). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Infante, D.A., & Wigley, C.J. (1986) Verbal aggressiveness: an interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61-69.
37. Johnson, A. J., Becker, J. A., Wigley, S., Haigh, M. M., & Craig, E. A. (2007).
38. Reported argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness levels: The influence of type of argument. Communication Studies, 58(2), 189-205.
39. Knight, A. M., & McNeill, K. L. (2012). Comparing students‟ written and verbal
40. scientific arguments. In annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Indianapolis, IN.
41. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
42. Krashen, S. (1997). Foreign language education: The easy way. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.
43. Lan, R., & Oxford, R.L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL, 41(4), 339-379.
44. Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337.
45. Manoli, P., Bekiari, A. (2015). EFL teachers‟ verbal aggressiveness and students‟
46. intrinsic motivation and social-affective strategy use: investigating possible relations. Advances in Research, 5(6), 1-13.
47. Mazer, J. P., & Stowe, S. A. (2015). Can Teacher Immediacy Reduce the Impact of
48. Verbal Aggressiveness? Examining Effects on Student Outcomes and Perceptions of Teacher Credibility. Western Journal of Communication, (ahead-of-print), 1-17.
49. McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect
50. toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale, & M. Brooks (Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college stu- dent competence in speech communication. Annandale, VA: Speech Communica- tion Association.
51. Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and brain sciences, 34(02), 57-74.
52. Mikhaleva, A. B., Dyakonova, N. A., & Ivanova, N. A. (2015). Psychology of aggressive behavior and will. SWorld Journal Pedagogy, Psychology and Sociology, J11508, 120-198.
53. Mottet, T. P., & Beebe, S. A. (2006). The relationships between student responsive behaviors, student socio-communicative style, and instructors‟ subjective and objec- tive assessments of student work. Communication Education, 55(3), 295-312.
54. Mottet, T. P., Garza, R., Beebe, S. A., Houser, M. L., Jurrells, S., & Furler, L. (2008).
55. Instructional communication predictors of ninth-grade students‟ affective learning in math and science. Communication Education, 57(3), 333-355.
56. Mottet, T. P., & Richmond, V. P. (1998). An inductive analysis of verbal immediacy: Alternative conceptualization of relational verbal approach/avoidance strategies. Communication Quarterly, 46(1), 25-40.
57. Myers, S. A. (2002). Perceived aggressive instructor communication and student state motivation, learning, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 15, 113-121.
58. Myers, S. A., Bramm, M., & Martin, M. M. (2013). Identifying the content and topics of instructor use of verbally aggressive messages. Communication Research Re- ports, 30(3), 252-258.
59. Myers, S. A., & Knox, R. L. (2000). Perceived instructor argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness and student outcomes. Communication Research Reports, 17(3), 299-309.
60. Myers S. A., & Rocca K.A. (2000). The relationship between perceived Instructor Communicator style argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness. Communica- tion Research Reports, 17, 1-12.
61. Myers, S. A., & Rocca, K. A. (2001). Perceived instructor argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom: Effects on student perceptions of cli- mate, apprehension, and state motivation. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports), 65(2), 113-137.
62. O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
63. Oxbrow, G. (2005). Writing, reflection and learning- an interactive approach. Journal of PORTA LINGUARUM, 4, 167-184.
64. Oxford, R.L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
65. Oxford, R.L. (2002). Language learning strategies in nutshell: Update and ESL sug- gestions. In J.C. Richards & W.A. Renandya (Eds), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp.123-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Oxford, R.L., & Burry-Stock, J.A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for lan- guage learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.
67. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35(1), 43-55.
68. Pogue, L. L., & AhYun, K. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education, 55(3), 331-344.
69. Psaltou-Joycey A. (2010). Language learning strategies in the foreign language class- room. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.
70. Rancer, A. S., & Avtgis, T. A. (2014). Argumentative and aggressive communication, 2d ed. New York: Peter Lang.
71. Richmond, V. P., & Gorham, J. (1992). Communication, learning, and affect in instruction. Burgess International Group.
72. Saeidi, M., & Jabbarpour, N. (2011). EFL teachers‟ socio-affective strategy use in relation to students‟ academic achievement. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(3), 746-750.
73. Shamshiri, K., Noordin, N., & Sahandari, M. (2010). Effects of socio-affective strate- gy training on employing other strategies for listening comprehension tasks. In IABR & ITLC Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-11). Orlando, FL, USA.
74. Sheorey, R. (1999). An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English. System, 27, 173-190.
75. Syrmpas, I., & Bekiari, A. (2015). The Relationship between Perceived Physical Edu- cation Teacher‟s Verbal Aggressiveness and Argumentativeness with Students‟ Interpersonal Attraction. Inquiries in Sport & Physical Education, 13 (2), 21-32.
76. Tajzadeh, P., Khodabandehlou, M., Jahandar, S., & Najafi, M. (2013). The impact of socio-affective strategi0es on Iranian intermediate EFL learner‟s speaking ability. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 3(3), 670-674.
77. Teven, J.J. (2007). Teacher caring and classroom behavior: Relationship with student affect and perceptions of teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communica- tion Quarterly, 55, 433-450.
78. Thweatt, K.S., & McCroskey, J.C. (1998). The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility. Communication Education, 47, 348-358.
79. Vrettou, A. (2011). Patterns of language learning strategy use by Greek- speaking young learners of English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Aristotle universi- ty of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki.
80. Waldeck, J. H. (2007). Answering the question: Student perceptions of personalized education and the construct's relationship to learning outcomes. Communication Edu- cation, 56(4), 409-432.
81. Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2005). Advisor-advisee communication two: the influence of verbal aggression and humor assessment on advisee perceptions of advisor credibility and affective learning. Communication Research Reports, 22(1), 303-313.
82. Yamamori, K., Isoda, T., Hiromori, T., & Oxford, R.L. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn, and achievement over time. IRAL, 41, 381-409.