Araştırma Makalesi

Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science

1 - 28, 18.10.2019
https://doi.org/10.4026/isguc.634391

Öz

Industrial Relations and Labor is a
comprehensive research field where the dynamics and drivers related to the
working life are determined and the related working conditions and the
relations between the parties are regulated. In order to reveal the status of
the current literature in this field, this paper presents particular findings
obtained from the research articles within Industrial Relations and Labor
category of Web of Science via the methodologies of scientometrics and
bibliometrics. These methodologies combine metrics, statistics, and text and
network analytics to visualize the characteristics of the literature. In this
scope, this paper investigates the networks regarding journals, authors,
citations, and keyword distributions; and extracted the potential topics in the
field as well as the descriptive statistics and metrics to reveal the trends
Web of Science over a large-scale dataset. In a professional manner, relevant
findings of the study do not only highlight the dynamics and characteristics
with a holistic view but also reflect the insights and inspirations to
prospective studies. 

Kaynakça

  • Al, U., Sezen, U., & Soydal, İ. (2012). Türkiye’nin Bilimsel Yayınlarının Sosyal Ağ Analizi Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi. Accessed at http://www.bby.hacettepe.edu.tr/bilgibelge/file/SOBAG-110K044.pdf (July 23, 2018). Arthurs, H. (2014). From theory and research to policy and practice in work and employment- and beyond? Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 69(2), 423-446. Sociologie des Organisations (SciencesPo. and CNRS). 19 rue Amélie 75 007, Paris – France. Bellemare, G. (2000). End users: Actors in the ındustrial relations system? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(3), 383-405. Blei, D. M., & Lafferty, J.D. (2009). Topic models. Text Mining: Classification, Clustering, and Applications. Ashok Srivastava, Mehran Sahami (Eds.): 101-124. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton. ISBN 978-1-4200-5940-3. Blei, D. M., Andrew Y. N., & Jordan, M.I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022. BLS. 2018. About the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. BLS Information. Accessed at https://www.bls.gov/bls/infohome.htm (February 16, 2018). Boyack, K.W. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains: characterizing PNAS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5192-5199. Casey, D.L., & McMillan, G.S. (2008). Identifying the “Invisible Colleges” of the Industrial & Labor Relations Review: A bibliometric approach. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 62 (1), 126 – 132. DOI. 10.1177/001979390806200107. Chaykowski, R., & Weber, C. (1993). Alternative models of industrial relations graduate programs in Canadian and U.S. universities. Relations Industrielles, 48(1), 86-100. Cornell University. 2018. Cornell University. Accessed at https://www.cornell.edu/about/ (January 05, 2018). Dunlop, J. (1958). Industrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Encylopedia of Brittanica. (2018). Industrial relations. Encylopedia of Brittanica. Accessed at https://www.britannica.com/topic/industrial-relations (January 15, 2018). Fernandez‐Alles, M., & Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. (2009). Intellectual structure of human resources management research: A bibliometric analysis of the journal Human Resource Management, 1985–2005. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 161–175. DOI:10.1002/asi.20947. Filardo, P. M. (2001). Labor History bibliography, 2000. Labor History, 42(4), 397-425. Filardo, P. M. (2005). Labor History bibliography 2004. Labor History, 46(3), 329-345. Filardo, P. M. (2007). Labor History bibliography 2006. Labor History, 48(4), 429-456. Filardo, P. M. (2006). Labor History bibliography 2005. Labor History, 47(3), 361-395. Frege, C. (2008). The history of industrial relations as a field of study. P. Blyton, N. Bacon, F. Jack, & H. Edmund (eds). The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations: 35. SAGE. Garfield, E. (2009). From the science of science to scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 173-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.009. Gurzki, H., & Woisetschlaeger, D. M. (2017). Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 7, 147-166. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Zavadskas, E. K., Aibinu, A. A., Arashpour, M., & Chileshe, N. (2018). Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: A Scientometric analysis. Automation in Construction, 87, 235-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002. Hyman, R. (1995). Industrial Relations in Europe: theory and practice. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1(1), 17-46. ILO. (2018). ILO Thesaurus. International Labour Organization. Accessed at http://ilo.multites.net/defaulten.asp (January 12, 2018). Katz, H. C., Kochan, T.A., & Colvin, A.J. (2017). An Introduction to Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations. Singapore: McGraw Hill International Edition. Kaufman, B. E. (1993). The Origins and Evolution of the Field of Industrial Relations in the United States. Ithaca: ILR Press. Kaufman, B. E. (1998). Regulation of the employment relationship: The old institutional perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(3), 349-385. Kaufman, B. E. (2002). The role of economics and industrial relations in the development of the field of personnel/human resource management. Management Decision, 40(10), 962-979. Kaufman, B. E. (2004). The Global Evolution of Industrial Relations: Events, Ideas and the IIRA. Geneva: ILO. Kaufman, B., & Gall, G. (2015). Advancing industrial relations theory: an analytical synthesis of British-American and pluralist-radical ideas. Relations industrielles, 70(3), 407–431. Kochan, T. A. (1980). Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations: From Theory to Policy and Practice. RD Irwin. Lee, C.I.S., Felps, W., & Baruch, Y. (2014b). Mapping career studies: a bibliometric analysis. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.284. Lee, C.I.S., Felps, W., & Baruch, Y. (2014a). Toward a taxonomy of career studies through bibliometric visualization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 339-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.08.008. MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. ILR Review, 48(2), 197-221. Mallet. (2018). Mallet Tutorial: Generating and visualizing topic models with Tethne and MALLET. Accessed at https://pythonhosted.org/tethne/tutorial.mallet.html (January 10, 2018). Markoulli, M.P., Lee, C.I.S., & Felps, W. (2017). Mapping HRM: A structural analysis of the HRM field. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017(1), Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 2017. DOI: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.70. NBER. (2018). About The NBER. The National Bureau of Economic Research. Accessed at http://admin.nber.org/info.html (January 10, 2018). Osterman, P. (1994). How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it? ILR Review, 47(2), 173-188. Patience, G.S., Patience, C.A., Blais, B., & Bertrand, F. (2017). Citation analysis of scientific categories. Heliyon, 3(5), e00300. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00300. Piore, M. J. (2011). Whither industrial relations: Does It have a future in post-industrial society? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(4), 792-801. Salmerón-Manzano, E., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2017). Worldwide scientific production indexed by scopus on labour relations. Publications, 5(4), 25. doi:10.3390/publications5040025. Standing, G. (2008). The ILO: an agency for globalization? Development and Change, 39(3), 355-384. Steven McMillan G., & Casey, D.L. (2010). Paradigm shifts in industrial relations: A bibliometric and social network approach, in David Lewin, Bruce E. Kaufman, Paul J. Gollan (ed.) Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations (Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 17) Emerald Group Publishing Limited: 207-255. Tethne. (2018). Tethne: bibliographic network analysis in Python. Accessed at https://pythonhosted.org/tethne (January 10, 2018). Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2013). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI:10.1007/s11192-009-0146. VOSviewer, (2018). VOSviewer Website. Accessed at http://www.vosviewer.com (July 23, 2018).
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Yazarlar

İşıl Kellevezir

Güzin Özdağoğlu

Muhammet Damar Bu kişi benim

Aşkın Özdağoğlu

Yayımlanma Tarihi 18 Ekim 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Kellevezir, İ., Özdağoğlu, G., Damar, M., Özdağoğlu, A. (t.y.). Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources1-28. https://doi.org/10.4026/isguc.634391
AMA Kellevezir İ, Özdağoğlu G, Damar M, Özdağoğlu A. Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science. isguc.:1-28. doi:10.4026/isguc.634391
Chicago Kellevezir, İşıl, Güzin Özdağoğlu, Muhammet Damar, ve Aşkın Özdağoğlu. “Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resourcest.y., 1-28. https://doi.org/10.4026/isguc.634391.
EndNote Kellevezir İ, Özdağoğlu G, Damar M, Özdağoğlu A Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources 1–28.
IEEE İ. Kellevezir, G. Özdağoğlu, M. Damar, ve A. Özdağoğlu, “Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science”, isguc, ss. 1–28, doi: 10.4026/isguc.634391.
ISNAD Kellevezir, İşıl vd. “Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources. t.y. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.4026/isguc.634391.
JAMA Kellevezir İ, Özdağoğlu G, Damar M, Özdağoğlu A. Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science. isguc.;:1–28.
MLA Kellevezir, İşıl vd. “Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science”. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, ss. 1-28, doi:10.4026/isguc.634391.
Vancouver Kellevezir İ, Özdağoğlu G, Damar M, Özdağoğlu A. Characteristics of Industrial Relations and Labor Literature in the Scope of Web of Science. isguc. :1-28.