The cardiac electrophysiologic study

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 99 - 103, 01.05.2012

Alim Erdem Mehmet Yazıcı

https://doi.org/10.5505/abantmedj.2012.03521

Öz

The cardiac electrophysiology study EPS is an invasive procedure which tests the electrical conduction system of the heart to assess the electrical activity and conduction pathways of the heart. The EPS is indicated to investigate the cause, location of origin, and best treatment for various abnormal heart rhythm. In this report, we present a review of current literature about the basic principles and clinical uses of the cardiac electrophysiologic study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hyperparathyroidism, cinacalcet, hemodialysis

Kardiyak Elektrofizyolojik Çalışma

Öz

Kardiyak Elektrofizyolojik çalışma EPS kalbin elektriksel ileti sisteminin inceleyen invaziv bir işlemdir. Kalbin elektriksel aktivitesi ve ileti yollarının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılır. EPS işlemiyle anormal kalp ritimlerinin tanısı, nedenleri, orijin aldığı lokalizasyon ve tedavi yöntemleri belirlenir. Bu derlememizde klinik kardiyak elektrofizyolojik çalışmanın temel esasları ve klinik kullanımlarından literatürler eşliğinde bahsedilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kardiyak, elektrofizyoloji, aritmi

Kaynakça

• Nyrnes A, Mathiesen EB, Njİlstad I, Wilsgaard T, Lİchen ML. Palpitations are predictive of future atrial fibrilla- tion. An 11-year follow-up of 22,815 men and women: the Tromso Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 May 15.
• Reagan BW, Huang RL, Clair WK. Palpitations: an annoy- ance that may require clairvoyance. Circulation. 2012;125:958-65.
• Schweizer PA, Korosoglou G, Thomas D, Aulmann S, Remppis A, Witzens-Harig M, Katus HA. Chest pain, shortness of breath, and palpitations unmask an unex- pected diagnosis. Circulation. 2012;125:843-6.
• Prystowsky EN, Klein GJ. Techniques in electrophysio- logic testing. In: Cardiac arrhythmias: an integrated ap- proach for the clinician. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1994. p. 299–333.
• Josephson ME. Electrophysiologic investigation: General concepts. In: Clinical cardiac electrophysiology. Phila- delphia (PA): Lea & Febiger; 1993. p. 22–70.
• Rosen MR, Wit AL, Hoffman BF. Electrophysiology and pharmacology of cardiac arrhythmias. IV. Cardiac anti- arrhythmic and toxic effects of digitalis. Am Heart J. 1975;89:391-9.
• 7.Rosen MR, Hordof AJ, Hodess AB, Verosky M, Vul- liemoz Y. Ouabain-induced changes in electrophysiolog- ic properties of neonatal, young and adult canine cardi- ac Purkinje Fibers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975;194:255- 63.
• Muller T, Roy D, Talajic M, Lemery R, Nattel S, Cassidy D. Electrophysiologic evaluation and outcome of patients with syncope of unknown origin. Eur Heart J 1991; 12: 139–43.
• Click RL, Gersh BJ, Sugrue DD, Holmes DR Jr, Wood DL, Osborn MJ, Hammill SC. Role of invasive electrophysio- logic testing in patients with symptomatic bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 817–23.
• Denniss AR, Ross DL, Richards DA, Uther JB. Electrophys- iologic studies in patients with unexplained syncope. Int J Cardiol 1992; 35: 211–7.
• Bachinsky WB, Linzer M, Weld L, Estes NA 3rd. Useful- ness of clinical characteristics in predicting the outcome of electrophysiologic studies in unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1044–9.
• Twidale N, Heddle WF, Ayres BF, Tonkin AM. Clinical implications of electrophysiology study findings in pa- tients with bifascicular block and syncope. Aust N Z J Med 1988; 18: 841–7.
• Olshansky B, Mazuz M, Martins JB. Significance of induc- ible tachycardia in patients with syncope of unknown origin: a long-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 216–23.
• Teichman SL, Felder SD, Matos JA, Kim SG, Waspe LE, Fisher JD. The value of electrophysiologic studies in syn- cope of undetermined origin: report of 150 cases. Am Heart J 1985; 110: 469–79
• Doherty JU, Pembrook-Rogers D, Grogan EW, Falcone RA, Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, Cassidy DM, Kienzle MG, Almendral JM, Josephson ME. Electrophysiologic evalu- ation and follow-up characteristics of patients with re- current unexplained syncope and presyncope. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 703–8.
• Zipes DP, DiMarco JP, Gillette PC, Jackman WM, My- erburg RJ, Rahimtoola SH, Ritchie JL, Cheitlin MD, Gar- son A Jr, Gibbons RJ. Guidelines for clinical intracardiac electrophysiological and catheter ablation procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Intracardiac Electrophysiologic and Catheter Ablation Procedures). J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 555–73.
• Gibson TC, Heitzman MR. Diagnostic efficacy of 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring for syncope. Am J Car- diol 1984; 53: 1013–7.
• Clark PI, Glasser SO, Spoto E. Arrhythmias detected by ambulatory monitoring: lack of correlation with symp- toms of dizziness and syncope. Chest 1980; 77: 722–5.
• Marco JP, Philbrick JT. Use of ambulatory electrocardio- graphic (Holter) monitoring. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 53–68.
• Sheahan RG, Krahn AD, Le Feuvre C. To pace or not to pace? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995; 18: 1584–5.
• Stellbrink C, Diem B, Schauerte P, Brehmer K, Schuett H, Hanrath P. Differential effects of atropine and isopro- terenol on inducibility of atrioventricular nodal reen- trant tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2001;5:463-9.
• Zimetbaum P, Josephson ME. Evaluation of patients with palpitations. N Engl JMed 1998;338:1369–1373.
• Graff B, Graff G, Koźluk E, Tokarczyk M, Piątkowska A, Budrejko S, Kozłowski D, Dąbrowska-Kugacka A, Lewicka E, Swiątecka G, Raczak G. Electrophysiological features in patients with sinus node dysfunction and vasovagal syncope. Arch Med Sci. 2011;7:963-70.