Ceza Muhakemesinde Yetersiz Savunma Desteğinin Haksız Mahkumiyetlere Etkisi Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Hukuk Analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 83 Sayı: 3, 303 - 362, 15.10.2025

Esra Nur Bal , Aylin Yalçın Sarıbey

https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.1612901

Öz

Adaletin en temel güvencelerinden biri olan savunma hakkı, ceza yargılamasında yalnızca biçimsel olarak tanınmakla değil, ancak etkin ve nitelikli şekilde kullanıldığında anlam kazanmaktadır. Buna karşılık farklı ülkelerdeki haksız mahkumiyet vakalarının nedenleri arasında, savunmanın yetersizliği — özellikle etkisiz temsil — sıklıkla ikincil bir unsur olarak görülmekte, oysa uygulamada bu faktör doğrudan ve kalıcı sonuçlara yol açabilmektedir. Bu çalışma, Kıta Avrupası ve Anglo-Sakson hukuk sistemlerinde adil yargılanma hakkını, masumiyet karinesi ilkesini ve savunma mekanizmalarının yapısal işleyişini karşılaştırmalı olarak ele almakta ve yetersiz savunma desteğinin haksız mahkumiyetlere etkisini nitel doküman analizi yöntemiyle incelemektedir. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi kararları, yüksek yargı kararları ve somut dava örnekleri çerçevesinde yapılan analizler, savunma kalitesindeki eksikliklerin adil yargılanma hakkını nasıl zedelediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bağlamda, haksız mahkumiyetlere neden olabilen yetersiz savunma desteğinin önüne geçebilmek adına müdafilik mesleği için uzmanlık temelli sertifikasyon, kalite denetimi, zorunlu müdafilik kapsamında finansal iyileştirmeler ve yapısal reform önerileri geliştirilmiştir. Çalışma, savunmanın adalet sistemlerindeki işlevini yalnızca normatif değil, kurumsal dinamikler ışığında sorgulayan bütüncül ve özgün bir katkı sunmayı hedeflemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

hatalı mahkumiyetler , yetersiz savunma desteği , adil yargılanma hakkı , Kıta Avrupası , Anglo-Sakson

A Comparative Legal Analysis of the Impact of Inadequate Defense Support on Wrongful Convictions in Criminal Procedure

Öz

One of the fundamental guarantees of justice, the right to legal defence, acquires its true meaning not merely through its formal recognition in criminal proceedings, but through its effective and qualitative implementation. Nevertheless, among the causes of wrongful convictions across various jurisdictions, the inadequacy of defence counsel—particularly in the form of ineffective assistance—is often treated as a secondary factor, despite its direct and lasting impact in practice. This study offers a comparative analysis of the structural functioning of fair trial rights, the presumption of innocence, and defence mechanisms within Continental European and Anglo-Saxon legal systems. Using the method of qualitative document analysis, it investigates the effects of inadequate legal defence on wrongful convictions. Through an examination of judgments from the European Court of Human Rights, high court decisions, and selected case studies, the research reveals how deficiencies in defence quality undermine the integrity of the right to a fair trial. In this context, the study proposes a series of substantive reforms aimed at preventing wrongful convictions stemming from deficient defence support—including specialization-based certification for defence lawyers, independent quality oversight mechanisms, financial and professional enhancements within public defence schemes, and institutional restructuring. Ultimately, the study seeks to contribute a comprehensive and original perspective by situating the role of legal defence not only within a normative legal framework but also within broader institutional dynamics of justice systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

wrongful convictions , inadequate defence support , right to a fair trial , Continental Law , Anglo-Saxon Law

Kaynakça

• Blandisi, Isabella M. “Societal Perceptions of Wrongful Convictions.” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, University of Ontario Institute of Technology The Faculty of Social Science and Humanities Criminology, 2012.
• Bozbayındır, Ali Emrah. “Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi İçtihatlarında İddia Pazarlığı Kurumu.” Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2 (2021): 1447–1511.
• Canbolat, Bert. "DNA'nın Gücü: Haksız Mahkumiyetlerle Mücadelede Masumiyet Projesi." Türkiye Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Stratejik Analizler Merkezi (TÜRKSAM), 2 Temmuz 2024. https://www.turksam.org/detay-dna-nin-gucu-haksiz-mahkumiyetlerle-mucadelede-masumiyet-projesi.
• Cape, Ed. “Defense Rights, Duties, Norms, and Practices in Common Law and Civil Law Jurisdictions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process, edited by D. Brown, J. I. Turner, and B. Weisser, 189. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
• Cengiz, Serkan, Fahrettin Demirağ, Teoman Ergül, Jeremy McBride ve Durmuş Tezcan. Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Kararları Işığında Ceza Yargılaması Kurum ve Kavramları. Ankara: Türkiye Barolar Birliği, 2008.
• Damaška, Mirjan R. "The Common Law / Civil Law Divide: Residual Truth of a Misleading Distinction." In Common Law, Civil Law and the Future of Categories, edited by Janet Walker and Oscar G. Chase, 4–21. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Canada, 2010.
• Dioso-Villa, Rachel. “A Repository of Wrongful Convictions in Australia: First Steps Toward Estimating Prevalence and Causal Contributing Factors.” Flinders Law Journal 17 (2015): 162–202.
• Ergül, Teoman. “Savunmanın Teori ve Uygulaması.” Ankara Barosu Dergisi 4 (1990): 591-599.
• Free, Marvin D. “Wrongful Convictions: The African American Experience.” Race, Ethnicity and Law 22 (2017): 7–25.
• Gudjonsson, Gisli H. "The Science-Based Pathways to Understanding False Confessions and Wrongful Convictions." Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021).
• Harrison, Maicee, and Justin Trounson. “An Investigation of the Key Factors Leading to the Wrongful Conviction of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples.” Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues 24, no. 3–4 (2021): 20-36.
• Hudson, Jacqueline. “The Role of the Criminal Defence Lawyer in Adversarial and Inquisitorial Procedure.” In Strafverteidigung vor neuen Herausforderungen, edited by Thomas Weigend, Barbara Grunewald, and Susanne Walther, 45–59. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot GmbH, 2008.
• Hudson, Jacqueline. "The Role of the Criminal Defence Lawyer in an Inquisitorial Procedure: Legal and Ethical Constraints." Legal Ethics 9, no. 1 (2006): 30–44.
• Innocence Project. “About Innocence Project.” Innocence Project. Erişim 18 Ağustos 2024. https://innocenceproject.org/.
• Innocence Project. “Cases – Andre Hatchett.” Innocence Project. Erişim 18 Ağustos 2024. https://innocenceproject.org/cases/andre-hatchett/.
• İstanbul Barosu. "TBB Disiplin Kurulu Karar Özetleri." Erişim 2 Haziran 2025. https://www.istanbulbarosu.org.tr/FooterContent.aspx?ID=56&Desc=Tbb-Disiplin-Kurulu-Karar-%C3%96zetleri.
• İtişgen, Rezzan. “Kişinin Kendini Suçlamaya Zorlanamaması İlkesi.” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2012.
• Jiang, Na. “A Comparison of Wrongful Convictions in Death Penalty Cases between China and the United States.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 41 (2013): 144–166.
• Jiang, Na. “Iron Triangle of the Gong Jian Fa: Lessons from Wrongful Convictions in Capital Cases?” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 42 (2014): 406–422.
• Langbein, John H. “The Criminal Trial Before the Lawyers.” University of Chicago Law Review 45 (1978): 263–316.
• Lenth, Danielle. "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Justice: A Comparative Legal Study of the Amanda Knox Case." McGeorge Law Review 45 (2013): 347–382.
• Leverick, Fiona, and James Chalmers. “Causes of Wrongful Conviction.” In Post-Corroboration Safeguards Review: Report of the Academic Expert Group, edited by James Chalmers, Fiona Leverick, and Ailsa Shaw, 30–43. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government, 2014.
• Macfarlane, Bruce. “Convicting the Innocent: A Triple Failure of the Justice System.” Manitoba Law Journal 31, no. 3 (2005): 403-485.
• Morgan, Brittnay Lea-Andra. “Wrongful Convictions: Reasons, Remedies, and Case Studies.” Doktora Tezi, Appalachian State University, 2014.
• Olalere, Fasilat Abimbola. “Case Study Account of Causes and Legal Implication of Wrongful Conviction.” NAUJILJ 11, no. 2 (2020): 122–134.
• Olalere, Fasilat Abimbola. “Legal Implications of Wrongful Conviction Under The Nigerian Criminal Justice System.” Doktora Tezi, University of Ibadan, Department of Public Law, 2019.
• Oldham, James C. “Truth-Telling in the Eighteenth-Century English Courtroom.” Law and History Review 12 (1994): 95-121.
• Ostavciuc, Dinu. “Ensuring the Right to Defense in the Criminal Process.” Supremacy of Law 2, no. 3 (2023): 45–60.
• Öztunay, Ecem. “Masumiyet Karinesi.” İzmir Barosu Dergisi 88, no. 3 (2023): 369-386.
• Öztürk, Müberra. “Hukuka Kesin Aykırılık Hali Olarak Savunma Hakkının Kısıtlanması.” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 1998.
• Parkes, Debra, and Emma Cunliffe. “Women and Wrongful Convictions: Concepts and Challenges.” International Journal of Law in Context 11, 3 (2015): 219-244.
• Poyser, Sam. "Two: A Historical Overview of Key Cases." In Miscarriages of Justice, edited by Sam Poyser, Angus Nurse, and Rebecca Milne, 13–30. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 2018.
• Ren, Yong-an. “Research on Defense Right after the Reform of Criminal Justice Style.” Journal of Xiangtan University, no. 1 (2010): 36–38.
• Roach, Kent. “An Independent Commission to Review Claims of Wrongful Convictions: Lessons from North Carolina?” Criminal Law Quarterly 58 (2012): 283-302.
• Roach, Kent. “The Wrongful Conviction of Indigenous People in Australia and Canada.” Flinders Law Journal 17 (2015): 203–262.
• Robins, Jon. “Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.” Criminal Law & Justice 182, no. 15 (2024): 260-262.
• Sánchez, Nuria, Guadalupe Blanco-Velasco, Linda Geven, Jaume Masip and Antonio L. Manzanero. “Wrongful Convictions with Prison Sentences in Spain.” The Wrongful Conviction Law Review (2024).
• Sencer, Rasih Feridun. “Adil Yargılanma Hakkı.” İzmir Barosu Dergisi 78, no. 2 (2013): 108-173.
• Slinko, Kateryna, Fernando de Brito Alves, and Dirceu Pereira Siqueira. “Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Participants in Criminal Proceedings Brought to Criminal Responsibility.” Revista Jurídica Cesumar – Mestrado 24, no. 2 (2024): 663–672.
• Smolkova, IV. “'Miranda Rights': History of Their Establishment and Implementation in the Court Proceedings of the USA and the Russian Federation.” Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings, 2023, 57–69.
• Stephen, Frank H., Giorgio Fazio, and Cyrus Tata. “Incentives, Criminal Defence Lawyers and Plea Bargaining.” International Review of Law and Economics 28 (2008): 212–219.
• Stridbeck, Ulf, and Svein Magnussen. "Prevention of Wrongful Convictions: Norwegian Legal Safeguards and the Criminal Cases Review Commission." University of Cincinnati Law Review 80, no. 4 (2013): 1373–1390.
• Şık, Hüseyin. “Suçsuzluk Karinesi.” Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi 1 (2012): 103-145.
• Taşkın, Şaban Cankat. “Osmanlı Ceza Muhakemesi Hukukunda Şüpheli ve Sanığın Susma Hakkı.” TBB Dergisi 170 (2024): 383-424.
• Taylor-Baer, Charlotte M., and Gail S. Anderson. “Plagues in Our Criminal Justice System: An Analysis of Wrongful Conviction in Canada and Other Countries.” The Wrongful Conviction Law Review 4, no. 3 (2023): 191–224.
• Tilt, Laura. “The Aftermath of Wrongful Convictions: Addressing the Needs of the Wrongfully Convicted in England and Wales.” Doktora Tezi, University of Oxford, St Hugh’s College, Centre for Criminology, 2018.
• Tinsley, Alex. “Protecting Criminal Defence Rights through EU Law: Opportunities and Challenges.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 4 (2013): 461–480.
• Tozman, Önder. “Suçsuzluk Karinesi: Türk Hukukundaki Sonuçları.” Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11, no. 3–4 (2007): 315–353.
• Türk Dil Kurumu. Türkçe Sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr/. Erişim 16 Mayıs 2025.
• Türkiye Barolar Birliği. 2013-2017 Disiplin Kurulu Kararları ve Karşı Oylar. Ankara: Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayınları, 2017.
• Weigend, Thomas. “Defence Rights in European Systems under the Influence of the European Court of Human Rights.” In The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process, edited by D. Brown, J. I. Turner, and B. Weisser, 565–584. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
• Williams, Dortell, and Tony Majoy. “Convictions of the Innocent.” Journal of Prisoners on Prisons 22, no. 1 (2013): 10–26.
• Yayla, Mehmet. “Ceza Yargılamasında İspat İçin Yenilmesi Gereken Şüphe; Türkiye ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Sistemlerinin İncelenmesi.” Ankara Barosu Dergisi 3 (2013): 291-313.
• Zafer, Hamide ve Yağız Yavuz. “Ceza Muhakemesinde Suç Şüphesi ve Dereceleri.” Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi 30, no. 2 (2024): 462–485.