Powllster: A gamified mobile crowdsourcing platform for guiding new business ventures

Abstract

The selection of the right location is vital for the survival and growth of new business ventures, yet entrepreneurs often lack reliable and localized market insights to guide such decisions. To address this challenge, this study introduces Powllster, a gamified mobile crowdsourcing platform designed to help entrepreneurs and businesses evaluate potential locations and market opportunities. By combining crowdsourcing and gamification principles, the platform encourages users to provide location-based evaluations of businesses and neighbourhoods in an engaging manner. Usability and effectiveness were tested using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Net Promoter Score (NPS). The results revealed an SUS score of 73.27 and an NPS score of 18.51, reflecting positive user sentiment and a moderate willingness to recommend. The participants highlighted ease of use, seamless functional integration, and confidence in interaction, whereas negative perceptions were minimal. These findings demonstrate that Powllster is intuitive, engaging, and valuable for collecting and accessing market intelligence. In practice, it lowers barriers to market research and provides entrepreneurs with actionable, crowdsourced insights for data-driven decisions. Unlike traditional decision-support systems, Powllster integrates participatory data collection with user engagement, offering a novel and scalable tool for guiding new business ventures.

Keywords

• Gamification
• Mobile Information Systems
• Crowdsourcing
• Market Research
• Decision-making

References

1. Aris, H., & Din, M. M. (2014). On using mobile crowdsourcing for timely information solicitation and sharing of prices. 2014 9th International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (ICSOFT-EA), 2014, 518–523. google scholar
2. Asante-Darko, D., Osei, V., & Agbodjah, S. (2024). A triple bottom line decision framework for sustainable business location in the retail sector: A developing country perspective. Journal of Global Responsibility, 16(3), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-08- 2023-0128 google scholar
3. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776 google scholar
4. Bianchini, D., Fogli, D., & Ragazzi, D. (2016). Promoting citizen participation through gamification. Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971543 google scholar
5. Bigham, J. P., Jayant, C., Ji, H., Little, G., Miller, A., Miller, R. C., Miller, R., Tatarowicz, A., White, B., & White, S. (2010). Vizwiz: Nearly real- time answers to visual questions. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866080 google scholar
6. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189, 4–7. google scholar
7. Cantamessa, M., Gatteschi, V., Perboli, G., & Rosano, M. (2018). Startups’ roads to failure. Sustainability, 10(7). 2346. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072346 google scholar
8. Chatzimilioudis, G., Konstantinidis, A., Laoudias, C., & Zeinalipour-Yazti, D. (2012). Crowdsourcing with smartphones. IEEE Internet Computing, 16(5), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2012.70 google scholar

9. Chatzimilioudis, G., & Zeinalipour-Yazti, D. (2013). Crowdsourcing for mobile data management. 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, 2, 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MDM.2013.109 google scholar
10. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 google scholar
11. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, MindTrek 2011, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 google scholar
12. Eagle, N. (2009). txteagle: Mobile Crowdsourcing. In: Aykin, N. (eds) Internationalization, Design and Global Development. IDGD 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5623. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02767-3_50 google scholar
13. Elahi, S., Nika, A., & Tekin, C. (2023). Online context-aware task assignment in mobile crowdsourcing via adaptive discretization. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 10(1), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2022.3207418 google scholar
14. Estellés-Arolas, E., Navarro-Giner, R., & González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. (2015). Crowdsourcing Fundamentals: Definition and Typology BT - Advances in Crowdsourcing (F. J. Garrigos-Simon, I. Gil-Pechuán, & S. Estelles-Miguel, Eds.; pp. 33–48). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18341-1_3 google scholar
15. Fárkas, K., Nagy, Á. Z., Tomás, T., & Szabó, R. (2014). Participatory sensing based real-time public transport information service. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1109/PerComW.2014.6815181 google scholar
16. Faulkner, L. (2003). Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(3), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195514 google scholar
17. Feng, S., Woo, M., Chandramouli, K., & Ozcan, A. (2015). A game-based platform for crowd-sourcing biomedical image diagnosis and standardized remote training and education of diagnosticians. Optics and Biophotonics in Low-Resource Settings, 9314, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2077884 google scholar
18. Genovese, F., Bolognesi, M. M., Di Iorio, A., & Vitali, F. (2024). The advantages of gamification for collecting linguistic data: A case study using Word Ladders. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 14(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ojcmt.2024.04.017 google scholar
19. Gimpel, K., Schneider, N., O’Connor, B., Das, D., Mills, D., Eisenstein, J., Heilman, M., Yogatama, D., Flanigan, J., & Smith, N. A. (2010). Part-of-speech tagging for Twitter: Annotation, features, and experiments. Journal of the American Speech and Language Association, 58, e557371. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA547371 google scholar
20. Han, S., Jia, X., Chen, X., Gupta, S., Kumar, A., & Lin, Z. (2022). Search well and be wise: A machine learning approach to search for a profitable location. Journal of Business Research, 144, 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.049 google scholar
21. Hao, A., Lee, C. S., & Tan, W. C. W. (2019). Fun with AEDs: examining the effects of a gamified mobile crowdsourcing application. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia, 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365921.3365947 google scholar
22. Harburg, E., Kim, Y., Gerber, E., & Zhang, H. (2015). CrowdFound: A mobile crowdsourcing system to find lost items on-the-go. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1537–1542. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732757 google scholar
23. Hernández, T., & Bennison, D. (2000). The art and science of retail location decisions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 28(8), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550010337391 google scholar
24. Karakaya, A.-S., Hasenburg, J., & Bermbach, D. (2020). SimRa: Using crowdsourcing to identify near miss hotspots in bicycle traffic. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 67, 101197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2020.101197 google scholar
25. Keiningham, T. L., Cooil, B., Andreassen, W. T. & Aksoy, L. (2007). A longitudinal examination of net promoter and firm revenue growth. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.039 google scholar
26. Kézai, P. K., & Skala, A. (2024). Remarks on the location theories of startups: A case study on the Visegrad countries. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(9), 100063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100063 google scholar
27. Kohne, F., Totz, C., & Wehmeyer, K. (2005). Consumer preferences for location-based service attributes: A conjoint analysis. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 6(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2005.005963 google scholar
28. Krol, M. W., de Boer, D., Delnoij, D. M., & Rademakers, J. J. D. J. M. (2015). The Net Prometer Score – an asset to patient experience surveys? Health Expectations, 18(6), 3099–3109. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12297 google scholar
29. Lewis, J. R. (2018). The System Usability Scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 google scholar
30. Liu, H. K. (2017). Crowdsourcing government: Lessons from multiple disciplines. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 656–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12808 google scholar
31. Liu, H., & Wang, Y. (2018). The value of crowdfunding: An explanation based on demand uncertainty and comparison with venture capital. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(4), 783–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1434619 google scholar
32. Luengo-Oroz, M. A., Arranz, A., & Frean, J. (2012). Crowdsourcing malaria parasite quantification: An online game for analysing images of infected thick blood smears. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), e167. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2338 google scholar
33. Macakoğlu, Ş. S., Alakuş Çınar, B., & Peker, S. (2022). Kiyaslio: a gamified mobile crowdsourcing application for tracking price dispersion in the grocery retail market. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 18(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwis.2022.02.017 google scholar
34. Mandal, P. C. (2014). Net promoter score: a conceptual analysis. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 8(4), 209. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCP.2014.066899 google scholar
35. Manika, S., Karalidis, K., & Gospodini, A. (2021). Mechanism for the optimal location of a business as a lever for the development of the economic strength and resilience of a city. Urban Science, 5(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5040070 google scholar
36. Meng, C., Zhao, M., Pan, Z., Pan, Q., & Bonk, C. J. (2024). Investigating the impact of gamification components on online learners’ engagement. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00336-3 google scholar
37. Mokbel, M., Sakr, M., Xiong, L., Züfle, A., Almeida, J., Anderson, T., Aref, W., Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., & Cao, Y. (2024). Mobility data science: Perspectives and challenges. ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems, 10(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3652158 google scholar
38. Morschheuser, B., Hamari, J., & Maedche, A. (2019). Cooperation or competition – When do people contribute more? A field experiment on gamification of crowdsourcing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.10.001 google scholar
39. Mou, Y., Ma, Y., Guo, D., & Ding, Z. (2024). Effect of platform gamification rewards on user stickiness. Management Decision, 63(3), 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2023-1688 google scholar
40. Orozco, D. (2016). The use of legal crowdsourcing (“Lawsourcing”) to achieve legal, regulatory, and policy objectives. American Business Law Journal, 53(1), 145–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12074 google scholar
41. Petkov, P., Medland, R., Köbler, F., Krcmar, H., & Foth, M. (2011). Engaging energy saving through motivation-specific social comparison. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1945–1950. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979855 google scholar
42. Phuttharak, J., & Loke, S. W. (2019). A review of mobile crowdsourcing architectures and challenges: Toward crowd-empowered internet- of-things. IEEE Access, 7, 304–324. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885353 google scholar
43. Rae, D., & Blenker, P. (2023). The role of collective intelligence and collective agency in enterprising communities. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 18(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-09-2022-0141 google scholar
44. Rana, R. K., Chou, C. T., Kanhere, S. S., Bulusu, N., & Hu, W. (2010). Ear-phone: an end-to-end participatory urban noise mapping system. Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/1791212.1791226 google scholar
45. Reeves, B., & Read, J. L. (2009). Total engagement: How games and virtual worlds are changing the way people work and businesses compete. New York: Harvard Business Press. google scholar
46. Reichheld, F. (2011). The ultimate question 2.0 (revised and expanded edition): How net promoter companies thrive in a customer-driven world. google scholar
47. Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–55. google scholar
48. Ren, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, K., & Shen, X. (2015). Exploiting mobile crowdsourcing for pervasive cloud services: challenges and solutions. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(3), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7060488 google scholar
49. RiadHwsein, R. , Jeyachandran, S. , Satish, R. , Nuritdinovich, M. A. , Sundara Bala Murugan, P. , & Ghate, A. D. (2025). Evaluation metrics for user trust in information systems. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 2(15), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2025.IJISS.15.2.07 google scholar
50. Rönneberg, M., & Kettunen, P. (2023). A gamified map application utilizing crowdsourcing engaged citizens to refine the quality and accuracy of cadastral index map border markers. International Journal of Digital Earth, 16(2), 4726–4748. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2279673 google scholar
51. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2016). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Morgan Kaufmann. google scholar
52. Self, J. T., Jones, M. F., & Botieff, M. (2015). Where restaurants fail: A longitudinal study of micro locations. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 18(4), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2015.1068670 google scholar
53. Shen, X. (2015). Mobile crowdsourcing [Editor’s note]. IEEE Network, 29(3), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2015.7113217 google scholar
54. Snijders, R., Dalpiaz, F., Brinkkemper, S., Hosseini, M., Ali, R., & Ozum, A. (2015). REfine: A gamified platform for participatory requirements engineering. 2015 IEEE 1st International Workshop on Crowd-Based Requirements Engineering (CrowdRE), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CrowdRE.2015.7367581 google scholar
55. Storey, D. J. (2016). Understanding the small business sector. Routledge. google scholar
56. Suh, A., Wagner, C., & Liu, L. (2018). Enhancing user engagement through gamification. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1229143 google scholar
57. Surowiecki, J. (2004). Q & A with James Surowiecki. The Wisdom of Crowds. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/2004/06/01/0601chat_transcript.html google scholar
58. Tayeen, A. S. M., Mtibaa, A., Misra, S., & Biswal, M. (2021). Impact of locational factors on business ratings/reviews: A Yelp and TripAdvisor study BT - big data and social media analytics: Trending Applications (M. Çakırtaş & M. K. Ozdemir, Eds.; pp. 25–49). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67044-3_2 google scholar
59. Tullis, T. S., & Stetson, J. N. (2004). A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. Professional Association Conference, 1–12. google scholar
60. Vercammen, A., Ji, Y., & Burgman, M. (2019). The collective intelligence of random small crowds: A partial replication of Kosinski et al. (2012). Judgment and Decision Making, 14(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500002941 google scholar
61. Vergara-Borge, F., López-de-Ipiña, D., Emaldi, M., Olivares-Rodríguez, C., Khan, Z., & Soomro, K. (2025). Gamifying engagement in spatial crowdsourcing: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study on Gamification Impact Among University Students. In Systems (Vol. 13, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13070519 google scholar
62. Vlachou, C., & Iakovidou, O. (2015). The evolution of studies on business location factors. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 20(04), 1550023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946715500235 google scholar
63. Wang, Y., Jia, X., Jin, Q., & Ma, J. (2015). Mobile Crowdsourcing: Architecture, Applications, and Challenges. 2015 IEEE 12th Intl Conf on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 2015 IEEE 12th Intl Conf on Autonomic and Trusted Computing and 2015 IEEE 15th Intl Conf on Scalable Computing and Communications and Its Associated Workshops (UIC-ATC-ScalCom), 1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC-ScalCom-CBDCom-IoP.2015.206 google scholar
64. Wazny, K. (2018). Applications of crowdsourcing in health: an overview. Journal of Global Health, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.010502 google scholar
65. Yang, M., & Leppäaho, T. (2023). Network bricolage of international entrepreneurs for new market entry: A cross-national study of small biotech firms. International Marketing Review, 40(7), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-05-2022-0133 google scholar
66. Yasim, M. H. M., Shukri, S. S. A., Nordin, N., & Zulkifli, N. W. (2025). The usability assessment of PRiSMA and My. Pharma-C Web application system. Indonesian Journal of Pharmacy, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/ijp.7938 google scholar
67. Ziegler, A., Peisl, T., & Raeside, R. (2023). Improving service quality through customer feedback – the case of NPS in IBM’s training services. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 15(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-09-2022-0106 google scholar