Mevcut Rekabette Hayatta Kalmak için Endonezya Jeo-uzamsal Sektörünün Geliştirilmesi

Yıl 2018, , 68 - 75, 21.12.2018

Budi Susetyo , İmmas Nurhayati İndu Purnahayu Puspa Eosina

https://doi.org/10.30801/acin.356758

Öz

Coğrafi
Bilgi Teknolojileri karar verme aracı olarak hızla gelişmektedir. Ancak
Endonezya, jeo-uzam endüstrisi için potansiyel pazarlara sahiptir. Şu
anda, coğrafi alan endüstrisi yetersiz görünüyor. Bu nedenle uygun bir plan
politikası, düzenlemesi ve eğitimi gereklidir. Mevcut çalışma, coğrafi alan
endüstrisinin rekabet gücünü ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Amaca yönelik rastgele
örnekleme ve kümeleme yöntemi kullanılarak alınan popülasyon örneği. Rekabet
endeksini analiz etmek için kompozit performans endeksi yöntemi kullanılmıştır.
Sonuç olarak, toplam jeo-uzamsal rekabetçilik endeksi değeri 100'lük
bir ölçekte ortalama 26,48'dir. Jeo-uzamsal sektör rekabetçilik
endeksinin araştırma sonuçları dikkate alındığında, Endonezya hükümeti eğitim
ve yeni fırsatlar yaratarak jeo-uzamsal sektörü desteklemeli ve
geliştirmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ASEAN ekonomik topluluğu, Rekabet Edebilirlik, Karar verme becerisi

Enhancing Indonesian Geospatial Industry to Survive in the Current Competition

Öz

Geospatial
Information Technology is developing rapidly as a decision making tool. However
Indonesia has potential markets for the geospatial industry. Currently, the
geospatial industry seems incompetent. Hence a proper plan policy, regulation
and training is needed. Current study is aimed at measuring the competitiveness
of geospatial industry. Population sample where taken using purposive random
sampling and clustering method. Composite performance index method is used to
analyze the competitiveness index. The result shows, the overall geospatial
competitiveness index value has an average of 26.48 on a scale of 100.
Considering the research results of geospatial industry competitiveness index,
the government of Indonesia must urgently support and enhance geospatial
industry through training and creating new opportunities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ASEAN economic community, Competitiveness, Decision making

Kaynakça

• Amhar F., A. Karsidi, B Susetyo. (2013). Informatics Technology to support the Geospatial Information Management. Seminar Paper on National Geo-Campus. Cooperation between National Geospatial Agency with Bogor Ibn Khaldun University. Bogor.
• Amhar, F., B. Susetyo, Suprajaka, Soemaryono, I. Yanuarsyah. (2016). Projection of Geospatial Human Resources In Indonesia Until 2025. Proceedings-ISBN 978-87-92853-35-6, ISSN: 2307-4086. International Federation of Surveyors (FIG). Christchurch-Australia.
• Bustami, G. (2015). Towards ASEAN Economic Community 2015. Ministry of Trade RoI. Jakarta
• Manning, C. and H. Aswicahyono. (2012). Trade and Employment in Service Sectors in Indonesia,” Report of International Labour Organization (ILO), 12 July 2012. http://www.ilo.org/jakarta/ whatwedo/publications/WCMS_185656/lang--en/index.htm
• Endecon. (2014). Assessment of the Economic Value of the Geospatial Information Industry in Ireland. Indecon International Economic Consultants. Ireland.
• Fairbairn, D. (2014). Experiences in Manpower Planning for Geomatics. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences,Volume XL-6, 2014. ISPRS Technical Commission VI Symposium, 19 – 21 May 2014, Wuhan, China. School of Civil Engineering & Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom –[e-mail]
• Federal Geographic Data Committee. (2013). National Spatial Data Infrastructure Strategic Plan 2014–2016: Reston, Virginia, USA, Federal Geographic Data Committee, 19 p.
• Fernández, T.D.,M.D Fernández, R.E. Andrade. (2012). The Spatial Data Infrastructure Readiness model and its worldwide application. National Commission of the SDI of the Republic of Cuba. Polytechnic University of Havana, CUJAE, Havana, Cuba. Email: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail].
• IMF (2014): Report for Selected Countries and Subjects. http://www.imf.org.
• Keliat, M, A. Virgianita, S Al Banna, Choiruzzad, A.C.A. Putro. (2013). Mapping of Indonesian Skilled Workers and ASEAN Service Liberalization. Research Report of ASEAN Study Center University of Indonesia cooperation with Ministry of Foreign Affairs Republik of Indonesia. Jakarta
• NGAC. (2012). Geospatial Workforce Development: A compendium of white papers focused on advancing geospatial workforce development. National Geospatial Advisory Committee. USA
• Owen, D., A. Green and P. Elias. (2009). Review of Spatial Data Needs and Resources. The National Data Strategy-Economic & Social Research Council. Institute for Employment Research, University of Warwick. Coventry CV4 7AL. UK.
• Oxera. (2013). What Is The Economic Impact of Geo Service?. www.Oxera.com. Park Central 40/41 Park End Street Oxford OX1 1JD United Kingdom.
• Schwab, K. (2013). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014. World Economic Forum. Columbia University. USA.
• Statistics Canada. (2003). Table 358-0060 - Survey of innovation, selected service industries, percentage of business units that carried out certain types of geomatics activities, occasional (percent), CANSIM (database). URL: http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/pick-choisir?lang= eng&p2=33&id=3580060. Accessed: 12 June 2015)
• UN-GGIM. (2013). Future trends in geospatial information management: the five to ten year vision, July 2013. Carpenter J and J. Snell. (Ed.). United Nations Initiative on Global Geospatial Information Management. UN.
• USDL. (2010). Geospatial Technology Competency Model. Employment and Training Administration-United States Department of Labor. URL: http://www.doleta.gov. USA
• Zhong, E., L. Liu. (2008). A Study on geospatial Industry Size In China. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences. P.R. China: 11A, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101.