TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION I MALOCCLUSION WITH RAPID MAXILLER EXPANSION AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 13 - 18, 01.04.2019

Sanaz Sadry Elif Solgun

Öz

The aim of this case report presents a case of
skeletal II and dental Class II divisional I treated
with functional appliance in a male patient with
increased overjet. A 9-year-11-month-old male
patient was admitted to our clinic with lower jaw
retention. Clinical and radiographic evaluation
revealed skeletal class II and dental class II division
I anomaly and increased overjet due to mandibular
retrognathie. The treatment was started with rapid
maxillary expansion. After the retention period of 6
months, the treatment was continued with activator
appliance to correct mandibular retrognathia.
Mandibular advancement and class I molar and
canine relationship were achieved after 10 months
of activator use. In conclusion, in the case of
dental class II division I, increased overjet, rapid
maxillary expansion and functional treatment with
activator appliance resulted in a good occlusion
with normal overbite and overjet with dental class
I relationships.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Class II division I, increased, overjet, functional treatment

Kaynakça

• 1. W. R. Proffit, H. W. Fields Jr., and L. J. Moray, “Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES-III survey,” The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, 1998; 13(2): 97- 106. 2. M. Alarashi, L. Franchi, A. Marinelli, and E. Defraia, “Morphometric analysis of the transverse dentoskeletal features of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition,” The Angle Orthodontist, 2003; 73(1): 21-25. 3. Martina R, Cioffi I, Galeotti A, et al. Efficacy of the Sander bitejumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion 4. Shen G, Hägg U, Darendeliler M. Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible - removable vs. fixed functional appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005; 8: 2-10. 5. Knierim K, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr. Assessing treatment outcomes for a graduate orthodontics program: Follow-up study for the classes of 2001-2003. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 648-655. 6. Pinskaya YB, Hsieh T-J, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr. Comprehensive clinical evaluation as an outcome assessment for a graduate orthodontics program. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 533-543. 7. C. Nelson, M. Harkness, and P. Herbison, “Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1993; 104: 153-161. 8. P. Cozza, T. Baccetti, L. Franchi, L. De Toffol, and J. A. McNamara Jr., “Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2006; 29(5): 599.e1-599.e12. 9. Garlapati Y, Jadav CL, Kolasani SR, Mummidi B. Management of sever class II division II malocclusion using simplified MPA-A case report. APOS Trends Orthod 2013; 3: 89-93. 10. Flavio U, Ravindra N. Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations. Journal of Clinic Orthodontics 2003; 37(11): 599-606.