Bariatrik Cerrahi Konusunda Yapılan Araştırmaların Bilim Haritalama Teknikleri ile Bibliyometrik Analizi

Abstract

Amaç: Fazla kilo ve obezite, sağlık için risk oluşturan anormal veya aşırı yağ birikimi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Obezite için birinci basamak tedaviler arasında diyet terapisi, fiziksel aktivite, davranış değişikliği ve ilaç kullanımı yer almaktadır. Bu yöntemlerin başarı sağlayamadığı durumda bu kişilerin obezite ile mücadelelerinde cerrahi seçenek gündeme gelmiştir. Obezite cerrahisi konusu özellikle son otuz yılda teknolojik gelişmelerin ışığında oldukça önemli bir değişim ve gelişim göstermiştir. Bu bağlamda hazırlanan bu çalışma ile konu ile ilgili yayınlanmış olan nitelikli araştırmalar incelenerek, bütüncül bir bakış açısı sunabilmek açısından “bariatrik cerrahi” konusunun tematik gelişimi görselleştirilmiştir.

Araçlar ve Yöntem: Araştırmada analize dahil edilen makalelere ilişkin veriler Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection veri taba-nından elde edilmiştir. Bu çalışmada 1990-2020 yılları arasında 9776 makaleye ulaşılmış ve bu makalelerin verilerini analiz için SciMAT ve Vosviewer programları kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları stratejik diyagramlar, tematik ağlar, örtüşüm haritası ve tematik gelişim haritası ile bilim haritalama ve bibliyometrik analizler kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir.

Bulgular: Yayımlanan makale sayısının 2001 ve sonrasında giderek artış gösterdiği görülmüştür. En fazla makale ABD tarafından yayınlanırken, bu ülkeyi Fransa, İtalya ve İspanya takip etmektedir. Makalelerin en fazla İngilizce, Almanca ve İspanyolca dillerinde yayınlandığı bulunmuştur. İncelenen makalelerin toplam atıf sayısının 199.761, h-indeks değerinin 141 olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Sonuç: Bu çalışmada; bariatrik cerrahinin 1990-2020 yılları arasında çok fazla gelişme gösterdiği gerçeği vurgulanmaktadır. Bilim haritalama teknikleri kullanılarak bu gelişimin dinamikleri incelenmiştir.

Keywords

• bariatrik cerrahi
• bibliometrik analiz
• bilim haritalama teknikleri
• obesite

Bibliometric Analysis of Bariatric Surgery Researches with Science Mapping Techniques

Abstract

Purpose: Overweight and obesity are pose health risks. First-line treatments for obesity include diet therapy, physical activity, behavior modification, and medication use. In cases where these methods fail, the surgical option comes to the fore in people's struggle against obesity. The subject of obesity surgery has shown a significant change and development in the light of technological developments. With this study prepared in this context, the thematic development of the "bariatric surgery" subject was visualized to present a holistic perspective by examining the qualified studies published on the subject.

Materials and Methods: The data of the articles included in the analysis in the study were obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database. In this study, 9776 articles were reached between 1990-2020 and SciMAT and Vosviewer programs were used to analyze the data. The research findings were evaluated with strategic diagrams, thematic networks, overlap maps, thematic development maps, science mapping and bibliometric analysis.

Results: It was observed that the number of published articles increased gradually in 2001 and after. Most articles were published by the USA, followed by France, Italy and Spain. It was seen that the articles were mostly published in English, German and Spanish. It was also determined that the total number of citations of the examined articles was 199.761 and the h-index value was 141.

Conclusion: This study emphasizes the fact that bariatric surgery showed much improvement between 1990-2020. The dynamics of this development were studied using science mapping techniques.

Keywords

• bariatric surgery
• bibliometric analysis
• science mapping tecniques
• obesity

References

1. 1. World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020. World Health Organization. 2013. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/94384 Erişim tarihi: 10.10.2020
2. 2. Lannoo M, Dillemans B. Laparoscopy for primary and secondary bariatric procedures. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology. 2014;28(1):159-173.
3. 3. Dietz WH. The response of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the obesity epidemic. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:575–596.
4. 4. Tavares A, Viveiros F, Cidade C, Maciel J. Bariatric surgery: epidemic of the XXI century. Acta Med Port. 2011;24(1):111–166.
5. 5. Baker MT. The history and evolution of bariatric surgical procedures. Surg Clin. 2011;91(6):1181–1201.
6. 6. Kremen AJ, Linner JH, Nelson CH. An experimental evaluation of the nutritional importance of proximal and distal small intestine. Ann Surg. 1954;140(3):439.
7. 7. Buchwald H, Varco RL. Ileal bypass in lowering high cholesterol levels. In: Surgical forum. American College of Surgeons, 1964;14:289-291.
8. 8. Buchwald H, Varco RL. Ileal bypass in patients with hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis: preliminary report on therapeutic potential. JAMA. 1966;196(7):627–630.

9. 9. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4(4):353–357.
10. 10. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–436.
11. 11. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11(4):959–975.
12. 12. Mokdad AH, Ballestros K, Echko M, et al. The State of US Health, 1990-2016: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Among US States. Jama. 2018;319(14):1444–1472.
13. 13. Chen C. Science mapping: a systematic review of the literature. J Data Inf Sci. 2017;2(2):1–40.
14. 14. Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ Res Methods. 2015;18(3):429–472.
15. 15. Kurutkan MN, Usta E, Orhan F, Simsekler MC. Application of the IHI Global Trigger Tool in measuring the adverse event rate in a Turkish healthcare setting. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27(1):11–21.
16. 16. Van Raan AF. Advances in bibliometric analysis: research performance assessment and science mapping. Bibliometr Use Abus Rev Res Perform. 2014;87:17–28.
17. 17. Web of Science https://apps.webofknowledge.com/Search.do?product=WOS&SID=D4suMpHK2LdGnWMOJBB&search_mode =GeneralSearch&prID=6b429962-6fc4-45a1-a67f-f705f278cf95 Erişim tarihi: 10.10.2020
18. 18. Science Mapping Analysis Tool https://sci2s.ugr.es/scimat/index.html. Erişim tarihi: 10.10.2020
19. 19. Cobo MJ, López‐Herrera AG, Herrera‐Viedma E, Herrera F. SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2012;63(8):1609–1630.
20. 20. Cobo MJ, Martínez M-Á, Gutiérrez-Salcedo M, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E. 25 years at knowledge-based systems: a bibliometric analysis. Knowledge-based Syst. 2015;80:3–13.
21. 21. Martínez MA, Cobo MJ, Herrera M, Herrera-Viedma E. Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Res Soc Work Pract. 2015;25(2):257–277.
22. 22. Murgado-Armenteros EM, Gutiérrez-Salcedo M, Torres-Ruiz FJ, Cobo MJ. Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis. Scientometrics. 2015;102(1):519–557.
23. 23. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Informetr. 2011;5(1):146–166.
24. 24. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, Ramanathan R, Luketich J. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515.
25. 25. Christou N V, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):416.
26. 26. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–1832.
27. 27. Le Roux CW, Aylwin SJB, Batterham RL, et al. Gut hormone profiles following bariatric surgery favor an anorectic state, facilitate weight loss, and improve metabolic parameters. Ann Surg. 2006;243(1):108.
28. 28. Rubino F, Forgione A, Cummings DE, et al. The mechanism of diabetes control after gastrointestinal bypass surgery reveals a ro-le of the proximal small intestine in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):741.
29. 29. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2008. Obes Surg. 2009;19(12):1605–1611.
30. 30. Karamanakos SN, Vagenas K, Kalfarentzos F, Alexandrides TK. Weight loss, appetite suppression, and changes in fasting and postprandial ghrelin and peptide-YY levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, double blind study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(3):401–407.
31. 31. Rosenthal RJ, Panel ISGE. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of> 12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19.
32. 32. Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg. 2004;14(9):1157–1164.
33. 33. TÜBİTAK Ulakbim Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi. Dünya, Ülkeler ve Gruplar Bilimsel Yayın Sayısı (2010-2015). https://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/bibliyometrik-analiz/turkiye-bilimsel-yayin-performans-raporlari/ Erişim tarihi: 10.10.2020
34. 34. Ozsoy Z, Demir E. The Evolution of Bariatric Surgery Publications and Global Productivity: A Bibliometric Analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28(4):1117–29.
35. 35. Dabi Y, Darrigues L, Katsahian S, Azoulay D, De Antonio M, Lazzati A. Publication Trends in Bariatric Surgery: a Bibliometric Study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2691–2699.
36. 36. Vecchio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F. History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med. 2000;42(01):87–90.
37. 37. Goh P, Tekant Y, Isaac J, Kum CK, Ngoi Ss. The technique of laparoscopic Billroth II gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2(3):258–260.
38. 38. Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84(5):695.
39. 39. Philip R. Schauer MD, FACS, Leader in Medicine. bestinmedicine.org. 2020. https://bestinmedicine.org/philip-r-schauer-md-facs/ Erişim tarihi: 10.10.2020
40. 40. Iannelli A, Frey S, Petrucciani N. Why Choosing the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Morbid Obese with a History of a Failed Nissen Fundoplication Is Not a Dogma. Obes Surg. 2020; 30:4599-4601.
41. 41. Teixeira JA, Ranev D. Revision of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty. Borao F, Binenbaum S. MG, ed. Revisional Foregut Surgery. Springer; 2020.
42. 42. Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267-282.
43. 43. Sridharan K, Kalayarasan R, Kamalanathan S, et al. Change in insulin resistance, beta cell function, glucagon-like peptide-1 and calcitonin levels two weeks after bariatric surgery. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2019;13(3):2142–2147.
44. 44. Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of action and therapeutic application of glucagon-like peptide-1. Cell Metab. 2018;27(4):740–756.
45. 45. Chang SH, Stoll CRT, Song J, Varela JE, Eagon CJ, Colditz GA. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):275–287.
46. 46. Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, et al. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj. 2013;347:5934.
47. 47. Black JA, White B, Viner RM, Simmons RK. Bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents: a systematic review and me-ta‐analysis. Obes Rev. 2013;14(8):634–644.
48. 48. Almalki O, Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH, Lee YC, Chen SC. Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Comparison of Roux-en-Y versus Single Anastomosis (Mini-) Gastric Bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):S128–129.
49. 49. Almalki OM, Lee WJ, Chong K, Ser KH, Lee YC, Chen SC. Laparoscopic gastric bypass for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a comparison of Roux-en-Y versus single anastomosis gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(4):509–515.
50. 50. Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, Chen TC, Wei PL, Huang MT. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):20.
51. 51. Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, Tsou JJ, Chen SC, Chen JC. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–1834.