Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Dijitalleşmeyle Birlikte Ortaya Çıkan Meydan Okumalar

Öz

İnsanlık karmaşık sosyal, ekonomik ve çevresel sorunlarla karşı karşıyadır. 2010’lu yıllarda mevcut sorunlara yönelik artan çözüm arayışları yeşil ve dijital dönüşümü hedefleyen politika gündemlerinin ortaya çıkmasını sağlamıştır. Birleşmiş Milletler 2015 yılında Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçlarını (SKA) ortaya koymuş ve uluslararası alanda etkili bir politika çerçevesi meydana getirmiştir. Aynı dönemde farklı ülkelerin yeşil ve dijital dönüşümü merkeze koyan açılımları arasında belki de en çok öne çıkanı, 2011 yılında Almanya’da, yeni yıkıcı dijital teknolojilerle endüstriyel üretimin, istihdamın yapısını ve küresel konfigürasyonunu önemli ölçüde değiştirebilecek yaklaşımıyla Endüstri 4.0 olmuştur. Endüstri 4.0’a karşılık 2016 yılında Japonya Toplum 5.0 açılımını ortaya koymuştur. 2021 yılında ise Avrupa Birliği, Toplum 5.0 söylemi ile uyumlu olan Endüstri 5.0 kavramı ile yeni bir gündem oluşturmuştur. Bu yaklaşımlarda dijitalleşme ve dijital dönüşüm mevcut çok yönlü ekonomik ve sosyal sorunların çözümüne yönelik olarak merkezi bir konumda yer almaktadır. Öte yandan, dünyada dijitalleşmenin mevcut seyri, bahsi geçen açılımların öngördüğünün aksi yönde sonuçlar da üretmektedir. Dijital dönüşümün sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın sağlanması etkili bir araç olabilmesi için dijitalleşmeden kaynaklanan mevcut sorunların anlaşılması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, sürdürülebilir kalkınma, dijitalleşme, dijital dönüşüm kavramları, Endüstri 4.0, Toplum 5.0 ve Endüstri 5.0 kavramları ele alınmış ve ilgili dokümanlar analiz edilmiştir. Ardından mevcut dijitalleşme trendinin sosyal ve çevresel yansımaları ve neden olduğu meydan okumalar değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sürdürülebilir kalkınma
• dijitalleşme
• dijital dönüşüm
• Endüstri 4.0
• Toplum 5.0
• Endüstri 5.0

Sustainable Development And The Challenges Emerging with Digitalization

Öz

Humanity faces complex social, economic and environmental problems. Increasing search for solutions to existing problems in the 2010s led to the emergence of policy agendas targeting green and digital transformation. The United Nations introduced the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015 and created an internationally effective policy framework. Among the initiatives of different countries that put green and digital transformation at the center during the same period, perhaps the most prominent one was Industry 4.0 in Germany in 2011, with its approach that would fundamentally change the structure and global configuration of industrial production and employment with new disruptive digital technologies. In response to Industry 4.0, Japan introduced Society 5.0 in 2016. In 2021, the European Union has created a new agenda with the concept of Industry 5.0, which is compatible with the Society 5.0 discourse. In these approaches, digitalization and digital transformation are in a central position for solving current multifaceted economic and social problems. On the other hand, the current course of digitalization in the world also produces results opposite to those predicted by the mentioned initiatives. In order for digital transformation to be an effective tool for achieving sustainable development, it is necessary to understand the current problems arising from digitalization. In this study, the concepts of sustainable development, digitalization, digital transformation, Industry 4.0, Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 were discussed and relevant documents were analyzed. Then, the social and environmental reflections of the current digitalization trend and the challenges it caused were evaluated.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainable development
• digitalization
• digital transformation
• Industry 4.0
• Society 5.0
• Industry 5.0

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu, D. ve Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: implications for employment and earnings (O. Ashenfelter ve D. Card, Ed.). Handbook of Labor Economics, 4B içinde (s.1043-1171). DOI 10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5.
2. Acemoglu, D. ve Restrepo, P. (2018). The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696
3. Acemoglu, D. ve Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: how technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3 doi=10.1257/jep.33.2.3
4. Arnold, M.G., Vogel, A. ve Ulber, M. (2021). Digitalizing higher education in light of sustainability and rebound effects—surveys in times of the covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(22), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212912
5. Arntz, M., Gregory, T. ve Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in oecd countries: a comparative analysis, OECD social, employment and migration working papers no.189. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
6. Audrey, A.A. ve Paksi, A.K. (2022). The challenges of the Japanese government to implement society 5.0. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 209. DOI 10.2991/aebmr.k.220209.058.
7. Bai, C., Dallasega, P., Orzes, G., Sarkis, J. (2020).  Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 229, 107776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776
8. Bataineh, O., Qablan, A., Belbase, S., Takriti, R. ve Tairab, H. (2022). Gender Disparity in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Programs at Jordanian Universities. Sustainability, 14, 14069. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114069

9. Berg, J., Green, F., Nurski, L. ve Spencer, D. (2022). Risks to job quality from digital technologies: are industrial relations in europe ready for the challenge?. Bruegel Working Paper 16/2022, https://www.bruegel.org/sites/default/files/2022-11/WP%2016.pdf
10. Bergman, N. ve Foxon, T.J. (2022). Drivers and affects of digitalization on energy demand in low-carbon scenarios. Climate Policy, 23(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2145260
11. Bieser, J.C.T ve Hilty, L.M. (2018a). Indirect effects of the digital transformation on environmental sustainability: methodological challenges in assessing the greenhouse gas abatement potential of ict. EPiC Series in Computing, 52, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.29007/lx7q
12. Bieser, J.C.T ve Hilty, L.M. (2018b). Assessing indirect environmental effects of information and communication technology (ict): A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10, 2662. doi:10.3390/su10082662
13. BTK. (t.y.), Toplum 5.0. https://www.btk.gov.tr/uploads/pages/arastirma-raporlari/toplum-5-0-arastirma-raporu.pdf
14. Braganza, A., Chen, W., Canhoto, A. ve Sap, S. (2022). Gigification, job engagement and satisfaction: the moderating role of ai enabled system automation in operations management. Production Planning & Control, 33(16), 1534-1547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1882692
15. Braxton, J. C. ve Taska, B. (2020). Technological change and the consequences of job loss. American Economic Review, 113(2), 279-316. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32996.53126
16. Breque, M., De Nul, L. ve Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0 towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient european industry. Research and Innovation Paper Series European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/308407
17. Camodeca, R. ve Almici, A. (2021). Digital transformation and convergence toward the 2030 agenda’s sustainability development goals: Evidence from Italian listed firms. Sustainability, 13, 11831. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111831
18. Carayannis, E.G. ve Morawska‑Jancelewicz, J. (2022). The futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and industry 5.0 as driving forces of future universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 3445–3471, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2
19. Carayannis, E.G., Canestrino, R. ve Magliocca, P. (2023). From the dark side of industry 4.0 to society 5.0: Looking “beyond the box” to developing human-centric innovation ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3239552
20. Carraz, R. ve Harayama, Y. (2018). Japan’s innovation systems at the crossroads: society 5.0. Digital asia. 33-45. file https://researchmap.jp/g0000218027/published_papers/20013396/attachment_file.pdf
21. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R. ve Punie, Y. (2017). Digcomp 2.1 the digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842
22. Chang, J. ve Huynh, P. (2016). Asean in transformation: The future of jobs at risk of automation. Working paper no 9. Geneva: ILO.
23. Charles, L., Xia, S. ve Coutts, A. P. (Yay. Hz.) (2022). Digitalization and Employment A Review. ISBN 978-92-2-037252-4
24. Chen, X., Despeisse, M. ve Johansson, B. (2020). Environmental sustainability of digitalization in manufacturing: A review. Sustainability, 12, 10298. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410298
25. Chung, H. ve Van Der Horst, M. (2018). Women’s employment patterns after childbirth and the perceived access to and use of flexitime and teleworking. Social Indicators Research, 71(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2028-7
26. Creutzig, F., Acemoglu, D., Bai, X., Edwards, P.N., Hintz, M.J., Kaack, L.H., Kilkis, S., Kunkel, S., Luers, A., Milojevıc-Dupont, N., Rejeski, D., Renn, J., Rolnick, D., Rosol, C., Russ, D., Turnbull, T., Verdolini, E., Wagner, F., Wilson, C., Zekar, A. ve Zumwald, M. (2022). Digitalization And The Anthropocene.  Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47, 479–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-120920-100056
27. De Felice, F., Travaglioni, M., ve Petrillo, A. (2021). Innovation Trajectories for a Society 5.0. Data, 6(11), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6110115
28. Dengler, K. ve Gundert, S. (2021). Digital Transformation and Subjective Job Insecurity in Germany. European Sociological Review, 37(5), 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa066
29. European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 final.
30. European Commission. (2021a). Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a Stronger Single Market for Europe's Recovery. SWD(2021) 352 final.
31. European Commission. (2021b). Women in Digital Scoreboard 2021. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/women-digital-scoreboard-2021
32. European Parliament (2021). Digital Automation And The Future of Work. https://doi.org/10.2861/826116. 
33. Fich, L.E., Viola, S. ve Bentsen, N.S. (2022). Jevons Paradox: Sustainable Development Goals and Energy Rebound in Complex Economic Systems. Energies, 15(16), 5821. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165821
34. Forti, V., Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R. ve Bel, G. (2020). The Global E-waste Monitor 2020, Erişim adresi: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Environment/Documents/Toolbox/GEM_2020_def.pdf
35. Freeman, R., Yearworth, M. ve Preist, C. (2015). Revisiting Jevons’ Paradox with System Dynamics Systemic Causes and Potential Cures. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(2), 341-353. HTTPS://DOİ.ORG/10.1111/jiec.12285
36. Frey, C.B. ve Osborne, M.A. (2017). The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs To Computerisation?. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 254–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
37. Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, Technology And Innovation Ecosystem Transformation Toward Society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107460 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033
38. Habrat, D. (2020). Legal Challenges of Digitalization And Automation In The Context of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 938–942. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.132
39. Harayama, Y. ve Fukuyama, M. (2017). Society 5.0: Aiming for a New Human-Centered Society: Japan’s Science and Technology Policies for Addressing Global Social Challenges, Erişim adresi: https://www.hitachi.com/rev/archive/2017/r2017_06/pdf/p08-13_TRENDS.pdf
40. Holroyd, C. (2022). Technological Innovation And Building A ‘Super Smart’ Society: Japan’s Vision of Society 5.0. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(1), 18–31, https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1749340
41. Huang, S., Wang, B., Li, X., Zheng, P., Mourtzis, D. ve Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, Complementation And Co-evolution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010
42. GeSI. (2015). ICT Solutions for 21st Century Challenges, Erişim adresi: https://smarter2030.gesi.org/downloads/Full_report.pdf
43. Gossart, C. (2015). Rebound effects and ICT: A Review of The Literature. Advances In Intelligent Systems And Computing içinde (s.435–448).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_26.
44. Government of Japan (2016). The 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan, Erişim adresi: https://5x5.wirelesswatch.jp/docs/S5-plan.pdf
45. Hayashi, Y. (2019). Japanese Science and Technology Basic Plan: A Perspective of Policy Process. Innovation and Development Policy, 1, 24-38, https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.2096-5141.2019.0003.
46. Herring, H., ve Roy, R. (2002). Sustainable Services, Electronic Education And The Rebound Effect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(5), 525-542, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00026-4
47. ILO. (2020). The Future of Work In The Digital Economy, Erişim adresi: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_771117.pdf
48. ITU. (2021). Digital Technologies to Achieve The UN SDGs, Erişim adresi: https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/backgrounders/Pages/icts-to-achieve-the-united-nations-sustainable-development-goals.aspx.
49. Jain, A. (2021). Impact of Digitalization And Artificial Intelligence As Causes And Enablers of Organizational Change, Erişim adresi: https://ficsa.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Impact_of_Digitalization_and_AI_-_Implications_for_the_international_civil_service_-_Final_report.pdf
50. Jevons, W. S. (1866). The Coal Question; An Inquiry Concerning The Progress Of The Nation, And The Probable Exhaustion Of Our Coal-Mines. Secon Edition Revised. London: MacMillan & Co, Erişim adresi: https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/317/0546_Bk.pdf
51. Kagermann, H., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., Schuh, G. ve Wahlster, W. (Ed.). (2016). Industrie 4.0 In A Global Context: Strategies For Cooperating With International Partners, Erişim adresi: https://www.acatech.de/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/acatech_eng_STUDIE_Industrie40_global_Web.pdf
52. Kagermann, H. ve Wahlster, W. (2022). Ten Years of Industrie 4.0. Sci, 4(3), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci4030026
53. Karabarbounis, L. ve Neiman, B. (2013). The Global Decline of the Labor Share. NBER Working Paper 19136. https://doi.org/10.3386/w19136
54. Katz, L.F. ve Krueger, A.B. (2017). The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995-2015. NBER Working Paper Series 22667. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22667
55. Keynes, J. M. (1930). Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren, Erişim adresi: http://www.econ.yale.edu/smith/econ116a/keynes1.pdf
56. Konle-Seidl, R. ve Danesi, S. (2022). Digitalisation And Changes In The World of Work. Study Requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL) Committee, Erişim adresi: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses
57. Kovacs, O. (2018). The Dark Corners of Industry 4.0 – Grounding Economic Governance 2.0. Technology in Society, 55, 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.07.009.
58. Lange, S., Pohl, J. ve Santarius, T. (2020). Digitalization And Energy Consumption. Does ICT Reduce Energy Demand?. Ecological Economics, 176, 106760, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760
59. Leng, J., Sha, W., Wang, B., Zheng, P., Zhuang, C., Liu, Q., Wuest, T., Mourtzis, D. ve Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0: Prospect and Retrospect. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 65, 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.09.017
60. Liu, R., Gailhofer, P., Gensch, C.O., Köhler, A. ve Wolff, F. (2019). Impacts of The Digital Transformation on The Environment And Sustainability. Öko-Institut e.V, Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342039732_Impacts_of_the_digital_transformation_on_the_environment_and_sustainability
61. López-Martínez, M., García-Luque, O. ve Rodríguez-Pasquín, M. (2021). Digital Gender Divide and Convergence in the European Union Countries. Economics, 15, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2021-0012
62. Maddikunta, P.K.R., Pham, Q., Prabadevi, B., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T.R, Ruby, R., ve Liyanage, M. (2022). Industry 5.0: A Survey on Enabling Technologies And Potential Applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 26, 100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257
63. Mahdavi S. ve Sojoodi, S. (2021). Impact of ICT on Environment. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1020622/v1
64. Mondejar, M.E., Avtar, R., Diaz, H.L.B., Dubey, R.K., Esteban, J., Gómez-Morales, A., Hallam, B., Mbungu, N.T., Okolo, C.C., Prasad, K.A., She, Q., Garcia-Segura, S. (2021). Digitalization to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Steps Towards A Smart Green Planet. Science of the Total Environment, 794, 148539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539
65. Marx, K. (2017). 1844 El Yazmaları. Murat Belge (çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
66. Maslej, N., Fattorini, L., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ligett, K., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Ngo, H., Niebles, J.C., Parli, V., Shoham, Y., Wald, R., Clark, J. ve Perrault, R. (2023). The AI Index 2023 Annual Report, Erişim adresi: https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report_2023.pdf
67. Microsoft. (2021). 2021 Work Trend Index: Annual Report The Next Great Disruption Is Hybrid Work – Are We Ready?. https://www.architecturalrecord.com/ext/resources/Issues/2021/07-July/Work-Trend-Index-2021-Annual-Report.pdf
68. Miskiewicz, R. (2022). Clean and Affordable Energy within Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Governance Digitalization. Energies, 15, 9571. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249571.
69. Mokyr, J., Vickers, C. ve Ziebarth, N. L. (2015). The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3) 31–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.31
70. Munoz-Boudet, A. M., Rodriguez-Chamussy, L., Chiarella, C., Oral-Savonitto, I. (2021). Women And STEM In Europe And Central Asia. World Bank Report No: AUS0002179, Erişim adresi: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED612413.pdf
71. Mourtzis, D. (2021). Towards The 5th Industrial Revolution: A Literature Review And A Framework For Process Optimization Based on Big Data Analytics And Semantics. Journal of Machine Engineering, 21, 5–39. https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/141834
72. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J. ve Panopoulos, N.A. (2022). Literature Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0. Energies, 15, 6276. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176276
73. Nakanishi, H. ve Kitano, H. (2018). Society 5.0: Co-Creating The Future, Erişim adresi: https://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/policy/2018/095_booklet.pdf.
74. Oberfield, E. ve Raval, D. (2014). Micro Data And Macro Technology, NBER Working Paper 20452. Erişim adresi: http://www.nber.org/papers/w20452.
75. Peña-Casas, R., Ghailani, D. ve Coster, S. (2018). The Impact of Digitalisation on Job Quality In European Public Services The Case Of Homecare And Employment Service Workers.  European Social Observatory – European Public Service Union Final Report, Erişim adresi: https://www.epsu.org/sites/default/files/article/files/FINAL%20REPORT%20EPSU%20DIGITALISATION%20-%20OSE%20June%202018.pdf
76. Pérez-Martínez, J., Hernandez-Gil, A., San Miguel, G., Ruiz, D. ve Arredondo, M.T. (2023). Analysing Associations Between Digitalization And The Accomplishment of the Sustainable Development Goals. Science of the Total Environment, 857, 159700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159700
77. Pohl, J., Hilty, J.M. ve Finkbeiner, M. (2019). How LCA Contributes to The Environmental Assessment of Higher Order Effects of ICT Application: A Review of Different Approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 698-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.018
78. Roblek, V., Meško, M., Bach, M.P., Thorpe, O. ve Šprajc, P. (2020). The Interaction Between Internet, Sustainable Development, and Emergence of Society 5.0. Data, 5(80). https://doi.org/10.3390/data5030080.
79. Narvaez-Rojas, C., Alomia Peñafiel, G.A., Loaiza Buitrago, D.F. ve Tavera Romero, C.A. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society. Sustainability, 13, 6567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567
80. Rojko, A. (2017). Industry 4.0 Concept: Background And Overview. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 11(5), 77. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v11i5.7072
81. Schneegans, S., Lewis, J. ve Straza, T. (Ed.) (2021). UNESCO Science Report: the Race Against Time for Smarter Development – Executive Summary. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
82. Schwab, K. ve Davis, N. (2018). Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimini Şekillendirmek. İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.
83. Sluiter, R., Manevska, K. ve Akkerman, A. (2020). Atypical Work, Worker voice And Supervisor Responses. Socio-Economic Review, 20(3), 1069-1089. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa022
84. Smit, S., Tacke, T., Lund, S. Manyika, J. ve Thiel, L. (2020). The Future of Work in Europe: Automation, Workforce Transitions, And The Shifting Geography of Employment. McKinsey Global Institute Discussion Paper 2020/6, Erişim adresi: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/the-future-of-work-in-europe.
85. Spencer, D. A. (2018). Fear And Hope In An Age of Mass Automation: Debating The Future of Work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 33(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12105
86. Sulkowski, L., Kolasinska-Morawska, K., Seliga, R. ve Morawski, P. (2021). Smart Learning Technologization in the Economy 5.0—The Polish Perspective. Applied Science, 11, 5261. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115261
87. Tavares, M.C., Azevedo, G. ve Marques, R.P. (2022). The Challenges and Opportunities of Era 5.0 for a More Humanistic and Sustainable Society—A Literature Review. Societies, 12, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060149
88. Tomczyk, L., Eliseo, M. A., Sánchez, G., Costas, V., Barros, M.J., Silveira, I. F., Oyelere, S.S. ve Amado-Salvatierra, H., (2019). Digital Divide in Latin America and Europe: Main Characteristics In Selected Countries. 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). DOI:10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760821
89. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Erişim adresi: A/70/L.1. UNCTAD. (2021). Digital Economy Report 2021 Cross-border Data Flows And Development: For Whom The Data Flow.
90. UNDP. (2021). Gender Equality In Digitalization: Key Issues for Programming, Erişim adresi: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/kg/gender_equality_in_digitalization.pdf
91. UNEP. (2021). The Growing Footprint of Digitalisation. Foresight Briefs, Erişim adresi: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/37439/FB027.pdf
92. UNEP. (2022). Digital Transformation: Becoming An Innovative, Agile And Collaborative Organization, Fit For Purpose In The Digital Age, Erişim adresi: https://www.unep.org/resources/policy-and-strategy/digital-transformation-becoming-innovative-agile-and-collaborative.
93. Walwei, U. (2016). Digitalization And Structural Labour Market Problems: The Case of Germany. ILO Research Paper No.17, Erişim adresi: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_522355.pdf
94. Widdicks, K., Lucivero, F., Samuel, G., Croxatto, L. S., Smith, M. T., Holter, C. T., Berners-Lee, M., Blair, G. S., Jirotka, M., Knowles, B., Sorrell, S., Börjesson Rivera, M., Cook, C., Coroama, V.C., Foxon, T.J., Hardy, J., Hilty, L.M., Hinterholzer, S ve Penzenstadler, B. (2023). Systems Thinking And Efficiency Under Emissions Constraints: Addressing Rebound Effects in Digital Innovation And Policy. Patterns, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100679
95. WCED. (1987). Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report), Erişim adresi: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
96. WEF. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020, Erişim adresi: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2020.pdf
97. WEF. (2021). Global Gender Gap Report 2021 Insight Report, Erişim adresi: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2021.pdf
98. Vickery, G. (2012). Smarter and Greener? Information Technology and the Environment: Positive or negative impacts?, https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/com_icts_vickery.pdf
99. Voss, E. ve Riede, H. (2018). Digitalisation and workers participation: what trade unions, company level workers and online platform workers in europe Think. https://www.etuc.org/sites/default/files/publication/file/2018-09/Voss%20Report%20EN2.pdf
100. Voss, E. ve Rego, R. (2019). Digitalization and public services: A labour perspective. FES Report, https://pop-umbrella.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/4fbc6dfa-0406-4050-b7eb-96033ab593ff_2019%20-%20EN%20Digit%20main%20report%20with%20foreword.pdf
101. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B. ve Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 And Industry 5.0—Inception, Conception And Perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
102. Zhang, D., Mishra, S., Brynjolfsson, E., Etchemendy, J., Ganguli, D., Grosz, B., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Niebles, J.C., Sellitto, M., Shoham, Y., Clark, J. ve Perrault, R. (2021). The AI Index 2021 Annual Report. Human-Centered AI Institute, Stanford University, https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2021-AI-Index-Report_Master.pdf
103. Zhang, K., Li, S., Qın, P. ve Wang, B. (2023). Spatial and Temporal Effects of Digital Technology Development on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(1), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010485