Bazı Ümitvar Koca Fiğ (Vicia narbonensis L.) Hatlarının Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi Yağışa Dayalı Koşullarında Ot Verim Performanslarının Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, bazı ümitvar koca fiğ (Vicia narbonensis L.) hatlarının Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi ekolojik koşullarında yeşil ot ve kuru madde verimleri ile bu verimler üzerinde etkili bazı önemli verim unsurlarını saptamak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Bu amaçla; 2008-09, 2009-10 ve 2010-11 ekim sezonlarında Diyarbakır GAP Uluslararası Tarımsal Araştırma ve Eğitim Merkezi Müdürlüğü deneme arazisinde, tesadüf blokları deneme desenine göre üç tekrarlamalı olarak tarla denemeleri yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada yeşil ot verimi ve kuru madde veriminin de aralarında bulunduğu beş özellik bakımından genotip × yıl interaksiyonu 0.01 düzeyinde istatistiki olarak önemli bulunurken, ana sap sayısı özelliği bakımından 0.05 düzeyinde önemli bulunmuştur. Doğal bitki boyu özelliği bakımından ise genotip × yıl interaksiyonu istatistiki olarak önemsiz bulunmuştur. Araştırmada denemenin yürütüldüğü yıllar ve genotipler arasında incelenen özellikler aşağıdaki gibi değişim göstermiştir. Yeşil ot verimi 19.42-37.95 t ha-1; kuru madde verimi 4.07-7.16 t ha-1; % 50 çiçeklenme gün sayısı 142.3-171.0 gün; doğal bitki boyu 63.8-79.3 cm; ana sap uzunluğu 79.3-133.3 cm; ana sap sayısı 1.93-3.40 sap bitki-1; ana sap kalınlığı 3.32-4.97 mm. Korelasyon analizi sonucuna göre; yeşil ot verimi ile kuru madde verimi arasında istatistiki olarak çok önemli ve olumlu ilişki belirlenirken (P

Keywords

• Koca fiğ (Vicia narbonensis L.), Yeşil ot verimi, Kuru madde verimi, Korelasyon, Genotip × yıl interaksiyonu

Determination of Forage Yield Performance of Some Promising Narbon Vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) Lines under Rainfed Conditions in Southeastern Turkey

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine fresh forage yield, dry matter yield, and their affecting components in promising narbon vetch lines (Vicia narbonensis L.) under rainfed conditions in the Southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Field trials were performed in the research areas of GAP International Agricultural Research and Training Center (GAP IARTC) in Diyarbakir, Turkey during the 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 growing seasons with winter sowings. Experiments were established according to randomized blocks design with three replications. Although the genotype × year interaction for the natural plant height trait was not found to be significant, the interaction was statistically significant (P<0.05) for the main stem number trait. For the other five traits, including fresh forage and dry matter yields, the genotype × year interaction was highly statistically significant (P<0.01). Among growing seasons and genotypes the investigated traits had ranges as follows: fresh forage yield – 19.42-37.95 t ha; dry matter yield – 4.07-7.16 t ha; days to 50% flowering – 142.3-171.0 days; natural plant height – 63.8-79.3 cm; main stem height – 79.3-133.3 cm; main stem numbers per plant – 1.93-3.40 stems plant; and main stem thickness – 33.2-4.97 mm. Correlation analyses indicated that there were highly significant and positive correlation between fresh forage yield and dry matter yield, though the correlation between fresh forage yield and days to 50% flowering were found as statistically significant and positive (P<0.05). According to averages over the three study years five promising narbon vetch lines: IFVN 564-Sel 2379, IFVN 565-Sel 2380, IFVN 567-Sel 2382, IFVN 116-Sel 2461, IFVN 562-Sel 2470, were all found more productive than the control cultivar, Tarman-2002, in terms of both fresh forage yield and dry matter yield.

Keywords

• Narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.),Fresh forage yield,Dry matter yield,Correlation,Genotype × year interaction

References

1. Açıkgöz E, Turgut I & Ekiz H (1986). Variation of seed yield and its compenents in Common Vetch under Different Conditions. XVI. International Grassland Congress, Nice-France, pp. 641-642
2. Açıkgöz E (2001). Forage Crops. Uludag Univ Publ no: 182, Bursa, Turkey, pp. 584
3. Albayrak S, M Güler & Tongel M O (2004a). Effects of seed rates on forage production and hay quality of vetch-triticale mixtures. Asian Journal of Plant Science 3(6): 752-756
4. Albayrak S, Sevimay C S & Tongel M O (2004b). The effects of inoculation with Rhizobium on forage yield and yield components of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 28: 405-411
5. Altınok S (2002). The effects of different mixture of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.) and narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) seeded with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) on silage quality. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8(3): 232-237
6. Altınok S & Hakyemez H (2002). The effects on forage yields of different mixture rates of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.) and narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) seeded with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8(1): 45-50
7. Anlarsal A E (1996). The effect of different cutting stages and seeding rates on forage and seed yields of narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 20(6): 529-534
8. Avcıoğlu R, Kavut Y T & Okkaoğlu H (2009). Narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). In Avcioglu, R. et al (eds). Forages-Legume Forages II. Publication of Turkish Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs, Izmir, pp. 421-425

9. Babat S & Anlarsal A E 2011. A study about the determination of yield and yield components of some common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) on ecological conditions of Diyarbakir. Journal of Science and Engineering of Çukurova University 26(3): 37-46
10. Ball D M, Collins M, Lacefield G D, Martin N P, Mertens D A, Olson K E, Putnam D H, Undersander D J & Wolf M W (2001). Understanding forage quality.
11. American Farm Bureau Federation Publication 1-01, Park Ridge, IL. Available at:http://forages. oregonstate.edu/resources/publications/foragequality. pdf (Access date: 15 November 2013)
12. Berger J D, Robertson, L D & Cocks P S (2002). Genotype x environment interaction for yield and other plant attributes among undomesticated Mediterranean Vicia species. Euphytica 126: 421-435
13. Büyükburç U, İptaş S & Yılmaz M (1994). A research on determination of annual some forage the legumes which will be adaptabtable in Tokat region.
14. Gaziosmanpasa University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 11: 145-156 Büyükburç U & İptaş S (2001). The yield and yield components of some narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis
15. L.) lines in Tokat ecological conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 25: 79-88 Ceçen S, Oten M & Erdurmuş C (2005). Evaluation of some annual forage legumes as second crop in the coastal region of West Mediterranean Belt of Turkey.
16. Akdeniz University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 18(3): 331-336. Gramsh E S (1982). Variation in the quantitative characters of Vicia sativa L. Plant Breeding Absract 52(5)
17. Fırıncıoğlu H K, Unal S, Pank Z & Beniwal S P S (2012).
18. Growth and development of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) genotypes in the semi-arid central Turkey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 10(2): 430-442 Iptaş S, Büyükburç U & Yılmaz M (1996). A research on determining the yield and adaptable of narbon vetch
19. (Vicia narbonensis L.) lines in Tokat conditions. Turkey 3rd Pasture-Meadow and Forage Crops Congress, 17-19 June, Erzurum-Turkey, pp. 301-307 Iptaş S & Karadağ Y (2009). Determination of the yield and yield components of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) lines grown in spring. 1st International
20. Symposium on Sustainable Development, June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo, pp. 83-88
21. Karadağ Y & Buyukburç U (2004). Effect of Different
22. Seed Ratios on forage and Seed Yield of Some Common Vetch Cultivars Under Tokat-Kazova Conditions. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Sciences 10(2): 149-157 Lindsey R & Reynold C (2003). A modern agricultural revolution in Fertile Cresent. (http://earthobservatory. nasa.gov/Features/Harran Plains)
23. Larbi A, Abd El-Moneim A M, Nakkul H, Jammal B & Hassan S (2010). Intra-species variations in yield and quality determinants in Vicia species: 2. Narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Animal Feed Science & Technology 162: 20-27
24. Nizam I, Orak A, Kamburoglu I, Cubuk M G & Moralar E (2011). Yield potentials of narbonne vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) genotypes in different environmental conditions. Journal of food Agriculture & Environment 9(1): 314-318
25. Rahmati T, Azarfar A, Mahdavi A, Khademi K, Fatahnia F, Shaikhahmadi B & Darabighane B (2012). Chemical composition and forage yield of three Vicia varieties (Vicia spp.) at full blooming stage. Italian Journal of Animal Science 11: e57: 309-311
26. SAS Institute (2002). JMP Statistics. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute, Inc. pp.707
27. Sabancı C O, Eginlioğlu G & Ozpinar H (1996). A study on adaptations of narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) and grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). Turkey 3rd Pasture-Meadow and Forage Crops Congress, 17-19 June, Erzurum, Turkey, pp. 287-292
28. Sabancı C O, Özpınar H & Eginlioğlu G (1998). Adaptations of forage crops to Menemen Conditions I. Narbon vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.). Anadolu Journal of AARI. 8(2): 42 - 50
29. Sayar M S, Anlarsal A E & Basbağ M (2010). Current situation, problems and solutions for cultivation of forage crops in the Southeastern Anatolian Region. Harran University Journal of Agriculture Faculty 14(2): 59-67
30. Sayar M S (2011). Some Important Forage Crops Species in Pasture and Meadow Spaces of Southeastern Anatolia Region. Publication of GAP International Agricultural Research and Training Center (GAP IARTC) Diyarbakir, Turkey, pp. 53
31. Sayar M S, Anlarsal A E Basbağ M & Açıkgöz E (2011). Determination of forage yield, its affecting components and relationships among traits of some forage pea (Pisum arvense L.) genotypes in Hazro ecological conditions. Turkey IX. Field Crops Congress, 12-15 September 2011, Bursa, Turkey, 3: 1716-1721
32. Steel G D & Torrie J H (1960). Principles and procedures of statistics with special reference to biological sciences. New York; McGraw-Hill
33. Tan M, Koç A, Dumlu Gül Z, Elkoca E & Gul I. 20 Determination of dry matter yield and yield components of local forage pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) ecotypes. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of Agricultural Science 19(4): 289-296 TIRTAFLS (2001). Technical Instruction for Registration
34. Trials in Annual Forage Legumes Species. Publication of Seed Registration and Certification Centre, Ankara, Turkey, pp.36 TMF (2011). Diyarbakır Regional Directorate of
35. Meteorology records, Turkish Meteorological Forecast of Turkey Türk M, Albayrak S and Yüksel O (2007.) Effects of phosphorus fertilisation and harvesting stages on forage yield and quality of narbon vetch. New Zealand
36. Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 457-462 Uzunmehmetoğlu B & Kendir H (2006). Effects of winter and spring sowings on grain yields of narbon vetch
37. (Vicia narbonensis L.). Tarim Bilimleri DergisiJournal of Agricultural Sciences 12(3):294-300 Van De Wouw M, Maxted N & Ford-Lyod B V (2003).
38. Agromorphological characterisation of common vetch and its close relatives. Euphytica 130: 281-292 Yılmaz S (2008). Effects of increased phosphorus rates and plant densities on yield and yield-related traits of narbon vetch lines. Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 32: 49-56
39. Yolcu H & Tan M. 2008. General view to Turkey forage crops cultivation. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi-Journal of
40. Agricultural Sciences 14(3): 313-312 Yücel C, Hızlı H, Firincioğlu H K, Cil A & Anlarsal A E (2009). Forage yield stability of common vetch
41. (Vicia sativa L.) genotypes in the Cukurova and GAP Regions of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry 33: 119-125