Influence of Harvesting on Quality of Alfalfa Forage used for Haylage and Hay

Abstract

The paper presents the three years efficiency results (2011-2013) of the work and ways of harvesting (three types of mowers, with or without spreading the forage) influencing the quality of the forage (the content of crude protein and crude fiber) during the three days drying process. These results indicate that the harvesting method can strongly affect the work efficiency, energy consumption, the forage drying intensity and the quality of forage used for hay and haylage preparation. The best quality of the forage was achieved when a drum rotating mower PÖTTINGER CAT 185 was used. Negative correlation was found between content of crude protein and the crude fibre content, depending on the type of mower, varying in the range between r= -0.978 and r= -0.882 (PÖTTINGER CAT 185 r= -0.882 P≤0.05 to JF STOLL

SB 200 r= -0.978 P≤0.001).

Keywords

• Mowers,Cutting,Drying,Crude protein,Crude fiber

References

1. Ahmad J, Iqbal A, Ayub M & Akhtar J (2016). Forage yield potential and quality attributes of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) under various agro-management techniques. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 26(2):465-474
2. AOAC (1990). Official methods of the association of official analytical chemists. Agricultural chemicals, contaminants, drugs. Volume one. Fefteenth Edition, AOAC, Inc., Arlington, Virginia
3. Bagg J (2004). Cutting, Conditioning & Raking For Faster Hay Drying. Ministry of Agriculture & Food, Ontario
4. Barać S, Vuković A, Milenković B & Biberdžić M (2012) Testing results of mower with different cutting devices in alfalfa mowing. Research Journal of Agricurtural Science 4 (1):241-248
5. Brummer E (2004). Applying genomics to alfalfa breeding programs. Crop Science, 44: 1904-1906
6. Dinić B & Djordjević N (2005). Preparation and use of silage, pp 1-126. Institute for research in agriculture ''Serbia'', Belgrade
7. Heuze V, Tran G, Boval M, Lebas F, Lessire M, Noblet J & Renaudeau D (2013). Alfalfa (Medicago sativa), Feedipedia.org.aprogramme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO
8. Hosseini S & Shamsi M (2012). Performance optimization of a rotary mower using Taguchi method. Agronomy Research Biosystem Engineering 1:49-54

9. Ivanov I (1988). Alfalfa. Published by Oxonian Press Pvt. New Delhi
10. Karayilanli E & Ayhan V (2016). Investigation of feed value of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) harvested at different maturity stages. Legume Research 39 (2): 237-247
11. Khadda S B, Lata K, Kumar R, Jadav K J & Rai K A (2015). Performance of lucerne (Medicago sativa) under semi-arid ecosystem of Central Gujarat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85 (2):199–202
12. Stanisavljević R, Beković D, Đukić D, Stevović V, Terzić D, Milenković J & Đokić D (2012). Influence of plant density on yield components, yield and quality of seed and forage yields of alfalfa varieties. Romanian Agricultural Research 29:245-254
13. Strbanović R, Simić A, Poštić D, Živanović T, Vučković S, Pfaf-Dolovac E, Stanisavljević R (2015). Yield and morpnological traits in alfalfa varieties of different origin. Legume Research 38 (4): 434-441
14. Strbanović R, Stanisavljević R, Đukanović L, Poštić D, Marković J, Gavrilović V & Dolovac N (2017). Variability and correlation of yield and forage quality in alfalfa varieties of different origin. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23 (1):128-137
15. Undersander D, Becker R, Cosgorve D, Cullen Eileen, Doll J, Grau C, Kelling K, Rice E M, Schmitt M, Sheaffer C, Shewmaker G & Sulc M (2004). Alfalfa management guide. American Society of Agronomy, Inc, Crop Sciene Sociaty of America, 1-66
16. Wenxu Z, Fangshan X, Ying L, Mingya W & Peisheng M (2017). Influence of year and row spacing on yield component andseed yield in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Legume Research 40 (2): 325-330
17. Wiersma D & Wiederholt R (2001). Alfalfa cutting height to maximize forafe yield and quality. University of Wisconsin