Determination of Genotypic Variation among Sorghum Cultivars for Seed Vigor, Salt and Drought Stresse

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine genotypic variation among sorghum cultivars grown under similar ecological conditions for seed vigor, salt (NaCl) and drought stresses. A seedling survival test was also performed in a pod experiment to investigate genotypic differences in terms of sorghum drought tolerance. In seven sorghum cultivars, seed vigor was determined using electrical conductivity and accelerated ageing tests. Also, germination rate and seedling growth of these cultivars were evaluated under salt and drought stress induced by PEG 6000 at water potentials of 0.0 (distilled water), -1.8, -3.6, -7.2 and -10.8 bar. The results showed that there was a significant difference in seed vigor of sorghum cultivars grown at same ecological conditions. Akdarı produced more vigorous seeds than the other cultivars. The significant relationship between accelerated ageing and laboratory emergence (r= 0.967**), and between electrical conductivity and germination percentage (r= -0.873**) were determined. The suitable tests for germination and emergence potential in sorghum were electrical conductivity and accelerated ageing, respectively. Increasing NaCl and PEG levels inhibited germination and seedling growth. Germination, root length and shoot length were higher, whereas mean germination time was lower, in NaCl solution compared to in PEG solution at the same water potential. In salt, drought and seedling survival tests, Aldarı showed the better performance than the others. It could be concluded that seed vigor is not a reliable indicator of germination performance under salt and drought stress conditions and that genetic differences may play an important role in stress tolerance.

Keywords

• Sorghum bicolor L.; Accelerated ageing; Salinity; Drought; Germination; Cultivar

References

1. Ambika R R, Muthiah A R, Manickam A, Shanmugasundaram P & John J A (2011). Indices of drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes at early stages of plant growth. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences 7: 42-46
2. Araus J L, Slafer G A, Reynolds M P & Royo C (2002). Plant breeding and water relations in C3 cereals: What should we breed for? Annals of Botany 89: 925-940
3. Cisse N D & Ejeta G (2003). Genetic variation and relationships among seedling vigor traits in sorghum. Crop Science 43: 824-828 Doggett H (1988). Sorghum. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York
4. El Naim A M, Mohammed K E, Ibrahim E A & Suleiman N N (2012). Impact of salinity on seed germination and early seedling growth of three sorghum (Sorghum biolor L. Moench) cultivars. Science and Technology 2: 16-20
5. Faheed F A, Hassanein A M & Azzoz M M (2005). Gradual increase in NaCl concentration overcomes inhibition of seed germination due to salinity stress in Sorghum bicolor (L.). Acta Agronomica Hungarica 53: 229-239
6. Francois L E, Donovan T & Maas E V (1984). Salinity effects on seed yield, growth and germination of grain sorghum. Agronomy Journal 76: 741-744
7. Hameed A, Gohler M & Iqbal N (2010). Evaluation of seedling survivability and growth response as selection criteria for breeding drought tolerance in wheat. Cereal Research Communications 38: 193-202
8. Hampton J G & TeKrony D M (1995). Handbook of vigour test methods. 3rd ed. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich, Switzerland

9. Igartua E, Gracia M P & Lasa J M (1994). Characterization and genetic control of germination, emergence responses of grain sorghum to salinity. Euphytica 76: 185-193
10. ISTA (2003). Handbook on seedling evaluation. 3 ed. International Seed Testing Association, Zurich, Switzerland
11. Kandil A A, Sharief A E, Abido W A E & Ibrahim M M (2012). Effect of salinity on seed germination and seedling characters of some forage Sorghum cultivars. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4: 306311
12. Kaur Gill P, Sharma A D, Sing P & Bhullar S S (2002). Osmotic stress-induced changes in germination, growth and soluble sugar content of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench seeds. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 28: 12-25
13. Khan M A & Gulzar S (2003). Germination responses of Sporobilus ioclados: A saline desert grass. Journal of Arid Environments 53: 387-394
14. Maiti R K, Ibarra M R & Sandoval N (1994). Genotypic variability in glossy sorghum lines for resistance to drought, salinity and temperature stress at the seedling stage. Journal of Plant Physiology 143: 241-244
15. McDonald M B (1993). The history of seed vigour testing. Journal of Seed Technology 17: 93-104 Michel B E & Kaufman M R (1973). The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol-6000. Plant Physiology 51: 914-916
16. Milosevic M, Vujakovic M & Karagic D (2010). Vigour tests as indicators of seed viability. Genetika 42: 103118
17. Munns R (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 239-250
18. Mutavaa R N, Prasada P V V, Tuinstrab M R, Kofoidc K D & Yua L J (2011). Characterization of sorghum genotypes for traits related to drought tolerance. Field Crop Research 123: 10-18
19. Saint-Clair P M (1976). Germination of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench under PEG-induced stress. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 56: 21-24
20. Santipracha W, Santipracha Q & Wongvarodom V (1997). Hybrid corn seed quality and accelerated ageing. Seed Science & Technology 25: 203-208
21. Smith R L, Hoveland C S & Hanna W W (1989). Water stress and temperature in relation to seed germination of pearl millet and sorghum. Agronomy Journal 81: 303-305
22. Soares M M, Conceição P M, Dias D C F S & Alvarenga E M (2010). Testes para avaliação do vigor de sementes de sorgo com ênfase à condutividade elétrica. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 34: 391-397
23. Tabatabaei S A & Anagholi A (2012). Effects of salinity on some characteristics of forage sorghum genotypes at germination stage. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 4(14): 979-983
24. Tari I, Laskay G, Takacs Z & Poor P (2013). Response of sorghum to abiotic stresses: A review. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sciences 199: 264-274 TeKrony D M & Egli D B (1991). Relationship of seed vigor to crop yield: A review. Crop Sciences 31: 816822