The Use of an Alternative Differential Set for Determination of Pyrenophora teres f. maculata Pathotypes

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4, 395 - 405, 04.12.2020

Bermet Beishenkanova Aziz Karakaya , Arzu Çelik Oğuz

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.504961

Cited By: 1

Öz

Pyrenophora teres f. maculata incites spot form of barley net blotch disease. For determination of Pyrenophora teres f. maculata pathotypes, a differential set consisted of 22 international cultivars and genotypes and a susceptible Turkish barley variety Bülbül 89 were tested using 45 isolates obtained from different regions of Turkey. Nineteen pathotypes were determined out of 45 isolates used. It appears that this differential set could be useful for determination of P. teres f. maculata pathotypes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Spot form of net blotch, Barley differential set, Drechslera teres f. maculata

Kaynakça

• Akhavan A, Turkington T. K, Askarian H, Tekauz A, Legge W. G, Xi K, Kutcher H. R, Tucker J. R, Kirkham C, Kumar K & Strelkov S. E (2015). Assessing the genetic and pathogenic variability of Pyrenophora teres f. maculata (spot form net blotch of barley) and its ability to overcome currently used sources of resistance on the Canadian prairies. In: Soil and Crops Workshop Proceedings, March 2015, Saskatoon.
• Çelik Oğuz A & Karakaya A (2017). Pathotypes of Pyrenophora teres on barley in Turkey. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 56 (2), 224-234.
• Grewal T.S, Rossnagel B. G & Scoles G. J (2008). The utility of molecular markers for barley net blotch resistance across geographic regions. Crop Science 48, 2321-2333.
• Gupta S, Loughman R, D’Antuono M & Bradley J (2012). Characterisation and diversity of Pyrenophora teres f. maculata isolates in Western Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 41(1), 31-40.
• Karki C. B & Sharp E. L (1986). Pathogenic variation in some isolates of Pyrenophora teres f. maculata on barley. Plant Disease 70, 684-687.
• Liu Z, Ellwood S. R, Oliver R. P & Friesen T. L (2011). Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen. Molecular Plant Pathology 12 (1), 1-19.
• Mathre D. E (Ed.) (1982). Compendium of Barley Diseases. American Phytopathological Society, Minnesota, p. 78.
• Rizvi S S H (1986). Thermodynamic properties of foods in dehydration. In: M A Rao & S S H Rizvi (Eds.), Engineering Properties of Foods, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 190-19
• McLean M. S, Howlett B. J & Hollaway G. J (2009). Epidemiology and control of spot form of net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. maculata) of barley: a review. Crop and Pasture Science 60 (4), 303-315.
• McLean M. S, Howlett B. J, Turkington T. K, Platz G. J & Hollaway G. J (2012). Spot form of net blotch resistance in a diverse set of barley lines in Australia and Canada. Plant Disease 96 (4), 569-576.
• McLean M. S, Martin A, Gupta S, Sutherland M. W, Hollaway G. J & Platz, G. J (2014a). Validation of a new spot form of net blotch differential set and evidence for hybridisation between the spot and net forms of net blotch in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 43 (3), 223–233.
• McLean M. S, Turkington T. K, Jalli M, Smit F & Platz G. J (2014b). A new international differential set for testing Pyrenophora teres f. maculata. IWBLD–1st International Workshop on Barley Leaf Diseases, 3-6 June, Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy.
• Tekauz A (1985). A numerical scale to classify reactions of barley to Pyrenophora teres. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 7 (2), 181-183.
• Tekauz A (1990). Characterization and distribution of pathogenic variation in Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata from western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 12 (2), 141-148.
• Wu H. L, Steffenson B. J, Li Y, Oleson A. E & Zhong S (2003). Genetic variation for virulence and RFLP markers in Pyrenophora teres. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 25(1), 82–90.