Assessment of Agricultural Sustainability in Sarikum Lake Basin, Sinop Province, Turkey

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 42 - 49, 04.03.2021

Tuba Beşen , Emine Olhan

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.547463

Öz

The sustainability of agriculture in social, economic and environmental dimensions is important in terms of development policies. In this study, agricultural sustainability has been evaluated in social, economic and environmental dimensions. Twenty-one indicators were used and each dimension had 7 indicators. The research was carried out in Sarıkum Lake Basin of Sinop province in Turkey. The information obtained by face-to-face surveys with the farmers and the related statistics were used as data. The index method was used in the evaluation of these data. As a result, agricultural sustainability in the basin was found 13.95% in the environmental dimension, 9.64% in the economic dimension and 16.62% in the social dimension. The agricultural sustainability in Sarikum Lake Basin was determined as 40.21%. As a result of the study, in order to achieve economic sustainability it is necessary to increase the agricultural income, the ratio of irrigated land and the number of agricultural holdings with sufficient income. In order to ensure social sustainability, it is necessary to establish conditions to prevent migration and to ensure that farmers are satisfied with farming. In order to achieve environmental sustainability, it is necessary to increase the amount of protected area and to reduce wild animal damage.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sustainability, index, indicator, protected area, ecosystem

Kaynakça

• Barrera Roldan A & Saldivar-Valdes A (2002). Proposal and application of a sustainable development ındex. Ecological Indicators 2 (2002) 251–256.
• Beşen T, Karakurt E, Elmas E, Karabulut Aloe A, Sürek D, Aysel Altundağ A, Bay U, Karahan F, Dengiz O, Namlı A, Ateş Ç, Saygın F, Cebel H, İncirkuş V, Demirkıran O & Başkan, O. (2018) Ekosistem yaklasimiyla kirsal kalkinma metodolojisinin gelistirilmesi projesi. 2018. Ankara.
• Cankurt M & Miran B (2010). Tractor brand preferences of farmers: an analytical hierarchy process approach. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science, 6(1), 13-17.
• Ceyhan V (2010). Assessing the agricultural sustainability of conventional farming systems in Samsun province of Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(13), 1572-1583.
• Dellal İ, Ozat H E & Ozudogru T (2007). Tarımda mazot kullanımı ve mazot destekleri çalışma raporu. Yayın No: 163, Tarim ve Koy Isleri Bakanligi, Eylül 2007, Ankara, Turkey.
• Demiryurek K, Ceyhan V & Argunhan E (2013). Organik ve konvansiyonel fındık yetiştiriciliği faaliyetlerinin sürdürülebilirliği. In: Proceeding of Turkiye 5. Organik Tarim Sempozyumu. Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi, 2013, Samsun.
• FRS (2015). The Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Farmer Registry System.
• FAO (2018) Retrieved in December, 12, 2018 from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/cpesap/C-RESAP_Info_package/Links/Module_4/Soil_erosion.pdf.
• FAO (2011). Save and Grow A policymaker's guide to the sustainable intensification of smallholder crop production. Retrieved in December, 12, 2018 from http://www.fao.org/ag/save-and-grow/en/3/index.html
• Frater P & Franks J (2013). Measuring agricultural sustainability at the farm level: A pragmatic approach. International Journal of Agricultural Management. 2(4), 207-225. ISSN:2047-3710
• Gameda S, Dumanski J & Acton D (1997). Farm level indicators of sustainable land management for the development of decision support systems. In: Proc international workshop on geo-information for sustainable land management, Enschede, The Netherlands, 1997 Gomez-Limon Jose A & Riesgo L (2008). Alternative Approaches on Constracting a Composite Indicator to Measure Agricultural Sustainability. Proceeding EAAE Seminar “Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies, Sevilla, Spain, 2008.
• Goymen K (2004). Yerel Kalkınma Önderi ve Paydaşı Olarak Belediyeler. Retrieved in August, 2, 2016 from https://research.sabanciuniv.edu/1427/1,korelGoymen.pdf.
• Gunduz O, Ceyhan V, Erol E & Ozkaman F (2011). An evaluation of farm level sustainability of apricot farms in Malatya province of Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 1. 9(1). 700-705.
• Guresci E (2009). Kirsal goc ve tarim politikasi arasindaki iliski. Muğla Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 22(2009), 51-67. İnan İ H, Gulcubuk B, Ertugrul C, Kanturer E, Baran E A & Dilmen O (2000). Tarımda Kırsal Kesim Örgütlenmesi, In: Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği 5.Teknik Kongresi, TMMOB-ZMO, 17-21 Ocak 2000, Ankara.
• Lynch J, Donellan T, Finn J A, Dillon E & Ryan M (2019). Potential development of Irish agricultural sustainability indicators for current and future policy evaluation needs. Journal of Environmental Management, 230 (2019) 434–445.
• MAF (2014). Ulusal kırsal kalkınma stratejisi 2014-2020 TR Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
• MAF (2017). Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Retrieved in February, 2, 2017 from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr
• M.E.A. (2005). A Report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington DC.
• Moore A, Dormody T, Van Leeuwen D & Harder A (2014). Agricultural sustainability of small – scale farms in Lacluta, Timor Leste. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 12(2). 130-145. doi:10.1080/14735903.842341.
• Mulligan M, Burke S & Ogilvie A (2016) Much More than Simply “Desertification”: Understanding Agricultural Sustainability and Change in the Mediterranean. In: Behnke R, Mortimore M. (eds) The End of Desertification? Springer Earth System Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• OECD (2002). Aggregated environmental indices review of aggregation methodologies in use. Working group on environmental ınformation and outlooks. Environment Directorate Environment Policy Committee. OECD. Env,epoc/Se (2001)2,final.
• Petrosyan A (2010). A model for incorporated measurement of sustainable development comprising remote sensing data and using the concept of biodiversity. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(2), June 2010. doi:10.5539/jsd.v3n2p9
• Pinter L & Herren H R (2006). From Common Principles to Common Practice. In: Proceedings and outputs of the first Symposium of the International Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA), March 16, 2006, Bern, Switzerland.
• Portakaldali M, Oztemiz S, Yarpuzlu F, Karut S & Eymirli S (2015). Biyolojik Mücadele [Biological Control]. Tarımsal Araştırmalardan Bakış. Retrieved in December, 10, 2016 from http://www.tepge.gov.tr/Dosyalar/Yayinlar/603d80dcde4d499cb6d7c82bae18b025.pdf
• Power, A.G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 365(1554). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143.
• Rigby,D, Woodhouse P, Young T & Burton M (2001). Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice. Ecological Economics, 39 (2001) 463-478. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00245-2.
• Ryan M, Hennessy T, Buckley C, Dillon E, Donnellan T, Hanrahan K & Moran B (2014). The development of farm level sustainability indicators for Ireland using the Teagasc National Farm Survey. Paper prepared for presentation at the 88th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society. Paris: AgroParisTech. [Google Scholar]
• Sulser T B, Duryea M L, Frolich L M & Guevara-Cuaspud E (2001). A field practical approach for assessing biophysical sustainability of alternative agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems, 68 (2) 113-135. doi: 10.1016/s0308-521x(01)00003-8
• Trisorio A (2004), Measuring sustainability, indicators of Italian agriculture, INEA, Rome.
• TR (2014). Turkish Republic, Law No. 5403 Soil Preservation and Land Utilization. Retrieved in October, 20, 2015 from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/05/20140515-1.htm
• Turkten H, Aydın Eryilmaz G, Ceyhan V & Kılıç O (2014). Bafra İlçesinde Çevre Amaçlı Tarım Arazilerin Korunması Programının Değerlendirilmesi ve İyi Tarım Uygulamalarının Etkilerinin Sürdürülebilirliği. In: Proceeding of XI. Ulusal Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi, 3-5 Eylül 2014, Samsun
• TUIK (2018a) Retrieved in October, 17, 2018 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=2745
• TUIK (2018b) Retrieved in October, 17, 2018 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=2743
• TUIK (2018c) Retrieved in October, 17, 2018 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=2288
• TUIK (2018d) Retrieved in October, 17, 2018 from http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=2287
• Van der Werf, H.M.G. & Petit, J. (2001). Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: a comparison and analysis of 12 indicator – based methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 93 (2002) 132-145. www.elsevier.com,lovate,agee
• Van Pham L & Smith C (2014). Drivers of agricultural sustainability in developing countries: a review. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(2), 326-341.
• Waney NFL, Soemarno, Yuliaty Y, Polli B (2014). Developing Indicators of sustainable agriculture at farm level. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 7 (2), 42-53. www.iosrjpurnals.orgVecchione G (2010). EU Rural Policy: Purposal and Application of an Agricultural Sustainability Index. Munich Personel RePec Archive.
• WB. (2018). Retrieved in December, 28, 2018 from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/source/population-estimates-and-projections#
• Yucer A, Demirtaş M, Altun A, Kan M, Çelik A & Kalanlar Ş (2015). Türkiye’de Tarım Arazilerinin Bölünmesinin Önlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma, Ankara.
• Zhen L & Routray J K (2003). Operational indicators for measuring agricultural sustainability in developing countries. Environmental Management, 32(1), 34-46.
• Zulfiqar F & Thapa G B (2017). Agricultural sustainability assessment at provincial level in Pakistan. Land Use Policy 68(2017) 492-502.