Determination of Morphological, Pomological and Molecular Variations among Apples in Niğde, Turkey using iPBS Primers

Year 2022, Volume: 28 Issue: 2, 296 - 306, 25.04.2022

Orkun Gencer , Sedat Serçe

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.876493

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In addition to morphological and pomological techniques, the molecular analysis produces more information for diversity studies. Recently, the iPBS marker system is one of the techniques and a new marker system for apple studies. In this study, morphological, pomological, and molecular characteristics of local apples were investigated in 48 different samples from 29 different rural areas with varying altitudes between 1125-1726 m in Niğde, Turkey. Fruit size, fruit weight, the color of fruit peel, total soluble solids content, fruit flesh firmness characteristics are important in terms of yield, quality, storage, transportation and attractiveness. According to the pomological results from these traits, CKR2, DMR3, CLL, HCB2, YSL, ULG, ELM1, ICM have been found to superior among genotypes. In order to molecular results, the similarity of the samples varies between 0.61-1.00, under the light of this result, molecular data differentiated all individuals used in the study except one pair. Molecular data displayed that these differences were caused by genotypic differences as well as environmental conditions. This study has contributed further information about the usage of iPBS primers on apple. To protect the plant material used in the study, a collection orchard was established with genotypes. To conclude, the findings are expected to shape future breeding studies.

Keywords

Malus domestica, genetic resource, genetic diversity, molecular analysis, polymorphism

References

• Anonymous (2014). Researches on Determining the Current Situation of the Agri-Food Sector and Research-Development, Innovation Needs in Niğde and Surrounding Provinces. Ayhan Şahenk Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies (In Turkish)
• Arıkan Ş, İpek M & Pırlak L (2015). Determination of phenological and pomological characteristics of some apple varieties in Konya ecological conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 3(10): 811-815 DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v3i10.811-815.402 (In Turkish)
• Bakır M, Dumanoğlu H, Erdoğan V, Ernim C & Macit T. (2019). Characterization of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes selected from Cappadocia region (Nevşehir-Turkey) by SSR markers. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(4): 498-507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.457850
• Chagne D, Dayatilake D, Diack R, Oliver M, Ireland H, Watson A, Gardiner SE, Johnston J W, Schaffer J R & Tustin S (2014). Genetic and environmental control of fruit maturation, dry matter and firmness in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Horticulture Research 1(1): 1-12. DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2014.46
• Coskun S & Askın M A (2016). Determination of Pomological and Biochemical Properties of Some Local Apple Varieties. SDU Faculty of Agriculture Journal 11(1): 120–131 (In Turkish)
• De Belie N, De Smedt V & De Baerdemaeker J (2000) Principal component analysis of chewing sounds to detect differences in apple crispness. Postharvest Biology and Technology 18(2): 109–119. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00070-8
• Dellaporta S L, Wood J & Hicks J B (1983). A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant molecular biology reporter 1(4): 19-21 DOI: 10.1007/BF02712670
• Demir Z & Doğan I (2020). The Impact of Different Cover Crops, Mechanical Cultivation and Herbicide Treatment on The Soil Quality Variables and Yield in Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) Orchard with a Coarse-Textured Soil. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 26(4): 452-470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.527445
• Demirel U, Tindas I, Yavuz C, Baloch, F S & Caliskan M E (2018). Assessing genetic diversity of potato genotypes using inter-PBS retrotransposon marker system. Plant Genetic Resources 16(2): 137 DOI: 10.1017/S1479262117000041
• Dunemann F, Kahnau R & Schmidt H (1994). Genetic relationships in Malus evaluated by RAPD ‘fingerprinting’of cultivars and wild species. Plant Breeding 113(2): 150-159 DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1994.tb00717.x
• Eltez M & Kaska N (1985). Selection of Highly Special Kaşel-Amasya Apple Types That Give Fruit Every Year in Niğde Region. Natural Science Journal 1(9) (In Turkish) FAO (2020). FAOSTAT. Retrieved in May 2020 from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
• Günes A & Durgac C (2018). Morphological, Phenological, Pomological and Molecular Identification of Apple Genotypes Grown in Gülnar Region. Journal of Moleculer Biology and Biotechnology 2(1): 28-33 (In Turkish)
• Hammer Ø, Harper D A & Ryan P D (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia electronica 4(1): 9
• Hancock J (2012). Plant evolution and the origin of crop species 3rd Edition. CABI
• Hinze L L, Fang D D, Gore M A, Scheffler B E, Yu J Z, Frelichowski J & Percy R G (2015). Molecular characterization of the Gossypium diversity reference set of the US National Cotton Germplasm Collection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128: 313–327 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-014-2431-7
• Hokanson S C, Szewc-McFadden A K, Lamboy W F & McFerson J R (1998). Microsatellite (SSR) markers reveal genetic identities, genetic diversity and relationships in a Malus× domestica Borkh. core subset collection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97(5-6): 671-683 DOI: 10.1007/s001220050943
• Hokanson S C, Lamboy W F, Szewc-McFadden A K & McFerson J R (2001). Microsatellite (SSR) variation in a collection of Malus (apple) species and hybrids. Euphytica 118(3): 281-294 DOI: 10.1023/A:1017591202215
• Kalendar R, Antonius K, Smýkal P & Schulman A H (2010). iPBS: a universal method for DNA fingerprinting and retrotransposon isolation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 121(8): 1419-1430 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-010-1398-2
• Kaya T, Balta F & Sensoy S (2015). Fruit quality parameters and molecular analysis of apple germplasm resources from van lake basin, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39(6): 864–875 DOI: 10.3906/tar-1406-24
• Kenis K & Keulemans J (2005). Genetic linkage maps of two apple cultivars (Malus× domestica Borkh.) based on AFLP and microsatellite markers. Molecular Breeding 15(2): 205-219 DOI: 10.1007/s11032-004-5592-2
• Kuras A, Antonius K, Kalendar R, Kruczy´nska, D & Korbin M (2013). Application of five DNA marker techniques to distinguish between five apple (Malus× domestica Borkh.) cultivars and their sports. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 88(6): 790-794 DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2013.11513040
• Masum B, Ergul A, Kazan K, Akcay M E, Yuksel C, Bakır M, Mutaf F, Akpınar A E, Yaşasın AS & Ayanoğlu H (2014). Genetic analysis of Anatolian apples (Malus sp.) by simple sequence repeat. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 52(5): 580-588 DOI: 10.1111/jse.12099
• Milovanov A, Zvyagin A, Daniyarov A, Kalendar R & Troshin L (2019). Genetic analysis of the grapevine genotypes of the Russian Vitis ampelographic collection using iPBS markers. Genetica 147(1): 91-101 DOI: 10.1007/s10709-019-00055-5
• Ozbek S (1978). Special Fruit (Deciduous Fruit Species In Winter). Çukurova University Publication of Agriculture Faculty (In Turkish)
• Rohlf F J (1998). NTSYS-pc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate system Version 2.0. Exet. Software. New York
• SAS Institute Inc (2005). SAS User Guide; Sas/Stat, Version 8. SAS Inst. Inc.
• Senyurt M, Kalkısım O & Karadeniz T (2015). Pomological characteristics of some standard and local apple (Malus communis L.) varieties grown in Gümüşhane region. Academic Agriculture Journal 4(2): 59-64 (In Turkish)
• Seymen T & Polat M (2015). Determination of Phenological, Pomological Properties and Morphological Characterization of Some Amasya Apple Types (In Apple). Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Science 19(3): 122-129. DOI: 10.29050/harranziraat.647181
• Smolik M & Krzysztoszek O (2010). Evaluation of genetic variability in choosen apple (Malus× domestica Borkh.) cultivars by ISSR-PCR analysis. Russian Journal of Genetics 46(7): 819-827 DOI: 10.1134/S1022795410070069
• TUİK (2020). Retrieved in May 2020 from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr
• Tijskens L M M, Herold B, Zude M & Geyer M (2007). How to choose criteria to harvest apples. The dynamics of maturity. In International Conference on Ripening Regulation and Postharvest Fruit Quality (796): 197-200. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.796.25
• UPOV (2005). Apple, Guidelines For The Conduct Of Tests For Distinctness, Uniformity And Stability. TG/14/9
• Zhang C, Chen X, He T, Liu X, Feng T & Yuan Z (2007). Genetic structure of Malus sieversii population from Xinjiang, China, revealed by SSR markers. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 34(10): 947-955 DOI: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60106-4
• Zhou Z Q & Li Y N (2000). The RAPD evidence for the phylogenetic relationship of the closely related species of cultivated apple. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47(4): 353-357 DOI: 10.1023/A:1008740819941