Engineering Models of Masonry by Joint Repairing Techniques

Abstract

When repointing historic masonry, it is the quality of the bond between mortar and stones that decides on the lifecycle of the structure. Once the composite system or the mortar start cracking, moisture can penetrate into the masonry and destroy the system. What mortar to use for what kind of masonry is normally an empirical decision. But in how far the mortar eventually selected is really suited for the purpose in question will not turn out until several years later. It is with this knowledge in mind that a simple engineering model has been developed, which is easy to use and which is to permit the likelihood of cracks to be assessed quantitatively. The model is based on calculations made for stresses occurring on the surface of the masonry and only requires a few material parameters. A combined, complex research model is being developed, which is to provide for exact structural analysis. For this model, the temperature and moisture transport is calculated with the aid of an FDM program. The temperature and moisture fields thus determined are then transferred to an FEM program which uses the material models of Rots (1997), Lourenço (1996) and Van Zijl (2000) for stress and deformation calculation.

Keywords: FDM program, Masonry, Joint Repairing Techniques 

References

1. Alberto A., Antonaci P., Valente S. 2011. Damage analysis of brick-to-mortar interfaces. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 1151-1156, Como Lake (Italy).
2. Bocca P., Grazzini A., Masera D., Alberto A.,Valente S. 2011. Mechanical interaction between historical brick and repair mortar: experimental and numerical tests. Journal of Physics, 305, 1-10.
3. Bocca P., Grazzini A. 2012. Experimental procedure for the pre-qualification of strengthneing mortars. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6 (3): 302-321.
4. Collepardi M. 1990. Degradation and restoration of masonry walls of historical buildings. Materials and Strctures, 23: 81-102.
5. Fassina V., Favaro M., Naccari A. and Pigo M. 2002. Evaluation of compatibility and durability of a hydraulic lime-based plaster applied on brick wall masonry of historical buildings affected by rising damp phenomena. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 3: 45-51.
6. Grazzini, A. 2006. Experimental techniques for the evaluation of the durability of strengthening works on historical masonry. Masonry International, 19: 113-126.
7. Lourenço, P. B. 1996. Dissertation. Computational strategies for masonry strictures. Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
8. Rots, J. G. 1997. Structural Masonry: An Experimental/Numerical Basis for Practical Design Rules., Rotterdam, Netherlands. Balkema.

9. Schmidt-Döhl, F. and Rostàsy, F. S. 2000. Abschlussbericht. Ingenieurmodell zur Dauerhaftigkeit des Verbundsystems Naturstein/Mörtelfuge mit Bezug auf die Neuverfugung historischen Mauerwerks. iBMB, TU Braunschweig.
10. Twelmeier, H., Sperbeck, S. T., and Budelmann, H. 2008. Restoration Mortar for Historical Masonry – Durability Prediction by means of numerical and Engineering Models, 14th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference.
11. Van Zijl, G.P.A.G. 2000. Computational Modelling of Masonry Creep and Shrinkage. Meinema BV, Delft, Netherlands.