Elektrokoagülayon Yöntemiyle Reaktif Yellow 160 Boyar Maddesinin Giderimi

Year 2017, Volume: 5 Issue: 3, 10 - 18, 01.10.2017

Ahmet Aygün , Beytullah Eren

https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.318608

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Demir
ve alüminyum elektrotlar ile donatılmış elektrokoagülasyon prosesinin (EP) kullanıldığı
çalışmada Reaktif Yellow 160 (RY160) boyarmaddesi giderimi üzerine başlangıç
pH, akım yoğunluğu, iletkenlik ve elektroliz süresinin etkisi incelenmiştir. EP’de elektrot materyalinden bağımsız olarak yüksek
renk giderim verimi elde edilmiştir. Optimum işletme şartları alüminyum
elektrot kullanılması durumunda, pH = 5, akım yoğunluğu 100 A/m²,
elektroliz süresi 10 dakika, iletkenlik 1000 µS/cm iken demir elektrot kullanılması durumunda pH = 7, akım yoğunluğu 200 A/m²,
elektroliz süresi 5 dakika, iletkenlik 1000 µS/cm olarak belirlenmiştir. Renk giderim verimi alüminyum
elektrot çifti için 2,3 kWsa/m³ enerji sarfiyatı ve 0,52 $/m³
toplam maliyetle %96,4 iken demir elektrot çifti için 1,7 kWsa/m³
enerji sarfiyatı ve 0,28 $/m³ toplam maliyetle %95,8 elde
edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, demir elektrot kullanımının alüminyum elektrot ile
karşılaştırıldığında RY160 boyarmaddesinin gideriminde daha ekonomik olduğunu
göstermiştir.

Keywords

Elektrokoagülasyon, Maliyet, Reaktif Yellow 160 (RY160)

Decolorization of Reactive Yellow 160 Dye by Using Electrocoagulation

Abstract

The effect of initial pH,
current density, conductivity and electrolysis time on Reactive Yellow 160
(RY160) dye removal was investigated by using
electrocoagulation process (EC) equipped with iron and aluminum electrodes
couple. High color removal efficiency was obtained independent of electrode
materials in EC. Optimum operational conditions was determined as pH = 5,
current density 100 A /m², electrolysis time 10 min and conductivity
1000 μS / cm for aluminum electrodes while it was pH = 7, current density 200 A/m²,
electrolysis time 5 min and conductivity 1000 μS/cm for iron electrodes. Color
removal was 96.4% with 2.3 kWh/m³ energy consumption and 0.52 $/m³
operating cost for aluminum electrode while it was 95.8% with 1.7 kWh/m³
energy consumption and 0,28 $/m³ operating cost for iron electrode. The
results show that, iron electrodes are more cost effective than aluminum
electrodes in removal of RY160 dye.

Keywords

Color Removal, Cost, Electrocoagulation, Reactive Yellow 160 (RY160)

References

• M. A. Al-Ghouti, M. A. M. Khraisheh, S. J. Allen, and M. N. Ahmad, “The removal of dyes from textile wastewater: A study of the physical characteristics and adsorption mechanisms of diatomaceous earth,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 229–238, 2003.
• Y. Gunes, R. Atav, and O. Namirti, “Effectiveness of ozone in decolorization of reactive dye effluents depending on the dye chromophore,” Text. Res. J., vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 994–1000, 2011.
• J. Blanco, F. Torrades, M. Morón, M. Brouta-Agnésa, and J. García-Montaño, “Photo-Fenton and sequencing batch reactor coupled to photo-Fenton processes for textile wastewater reclamation: Feasibility of reuse in dyeing processes,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 240, pp. 469–475, 2014.
• Y. K. Ong, F. Y. Li, S. P. Sun, B. W. Zhao, C. Z. Liang, and T. S. Chung, “Nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for textile wastewater treatment: Lab-scale and pilot-scale studies,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 114, pp. 51–57, 2014.
• F. Ciner, S. K. A. Solmaz, T. Yonar, and G. E. Ustun, “Treatability studies on wastewater from textile dyeing factories in Bursa, Turkey,” Int. J. Environ. Pollut., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 403–407, 2003.
• Y. Uysal, D. Aktas, and Y. Caglar, “Determination of Colour removal efficiency of Lemna minor L. from industrial effluents,” J. Environ. Prot. Ecol., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1718–1726, 2014.
• Z. Aksu and G. Dönmez, “Combined effects of molasses sucrose and reactive dye on the growth and dye bioaccumulation properties of Candida tropicalis,” Process Biochem., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2443–2454, 2005.
• H. S. RAI, M. S. BHATTACHARYYA, J. SINGH, T. K. BANSAL, P. VATS, and U. C. BANERJEE, “Removal of Dyes from the Effluent of Textile and Dyestuff Manufacturing Industry: A Review of Emerging Techniques With Reference to Biological Treatment,” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 219–238, 2005.
• H. Kocyigit and A. Ugurlu, “Biological decolourization of reactive azo dye by anaerobic/aerobic sequencing batch reactor system,” Glob. NEST J., vol. 17, no. X, pp. 1–10, 2015.
• S. Ozdemir, K. Cirik, D. Akman, E. Sahinkaya, and O. Cinar, “Treatment of azo dye-containing synthetic textile dye effluent using sulfidogenic anaerobic baffled reactor,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 146, pp. 135–143, 2013.
• C. S. D. Rodrigues, L. M. Madeira, and R. A. R. Boaventura, “Treatment of textile dye wastewaters using ferrous sulphate in a chemical coagulation/flocculation process,” Environ. Technol., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 719–729, 2013.
• [12] V. Golob, A. Vinder, and M. Simonič, “Efficiency of the coagulation/flocculation method for the treatment of dyebath effluents,” Dye. Pigment., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 2005.
• O. T. Can, M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, and M. Bayramoglu, “Treatment of the textile wastewater by combined electrocoagulation,” Chemosphere, vol. 62, no. 2, 2006.
• S. Karthikeyan, A. Titus, A. Gnanamani, A. B. Mandal, and G. Sekaran, “Treatment of textile wastewater by homogeneous and heterogeneous Fenton oxidation processes,” Desalination, vol. 281, no. 1, pp. 438–445, 2011.
• S. Şahinkaya, “COD and color removal from synthetic textile wastewater by ultrasound assisted electro-Fenton oxidation process,” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 601–605, 2013.
• M. F. Sevimli and C. Kinaci, “Decolorization of textile wastewater by ozonation and Fenton’s process,” in Water Science and Technology, 2002, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 279–286.
• N. Daneshvar, A. Oladegaragoze, and N. Djafarzadeh, “Decolorization of basic dye solutions by electrocoagulation: An investigation of the effect of operational parameters,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 129, no. 1–3, pp. 116–122, 2006.
• M. Y. Mollah, R. Schennach, J. R. Parga, and D. L. Cocke, “Electrocoagulation (EC)--Science and Applications.,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2001.
• M. Y. A. Mollah, P. Morkovsky, J. A. G. Gomes, M. Kesmez, J. Parga, and D. L. Cocke, “Fundamentals, present and future perspectives of electrocoagulation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 114, no. 1–3. pp. 199–210, 2004.
• I. Arslan-alaton, M. Kobya, A. Akyol, and M. Bayramoǧlu, “Electrocoagulation of azo dye production wastewater with iron electrodes: Process evaluation by multi-response central composite design,” Color. Technol., vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 234–241, 2009.
• M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, O. T. Can, and M. Bayramoglu, “Treatment of levafix orange textile dye solution by electrocoagulation,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 132, no. 2–3, 2006.
• O. T. Can, M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, and M. Bayramoglu, “Treatment of the textile wastewater by combined electrocoagulation,” Chemosphere, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 181–187, 2006.
• C. S. Keskin, A. Özdemir, and I. A. Şengil, “Simultaneous decolorization of binary mixture of reactive yellow and acid violet from wastewaters by electrocoagulation,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1644–1650, 2011.
• H. A. Kabuk, Y. Avsar, F. Ilhan, and K. Ulucan, “Comparison of pH Adjustment and Electrocoagulation Processes on Treatability of Metal Plating Wastewater,” Sep. Sci. Technol., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 613–618, 2014.
• K. K. Dermentzis, A. Christoforidis, and E. Valsamidou, “Removal of nickel, copper, zinc and chromium from synthetic and industrial wastewater by electrocoagulation,” Int. J. Environ. Sci., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 697–710, 2011.
• F. Akbal and S. Camci, “Comparison of electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation for heavy metal removal,” Chem. Eng. Technol., vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1655–1664, 2010.
• Ü. Tezcan Ün, S. Uǧur, A. S. Koparal, and Ü. Bakir Öǧütveren, “Electrocoagulation of olive mill wastewaters,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 136–141, 2006.
• H. Inan, A. Dimoglo, H. Şimşek, and M. Karpuzcu, “Olive oil mill wastewater treatment by means of electro-coagulation,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2004.
• O. Apaydin, U. Kurt, and M. T. Gonullu, “An Investigation on the Treatment of Tannery Wastewater by Electrocoagulation,” Water, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 546–555, 2009.
• A. Deghles and U. Kurt, “Treatment of tannery wastewater by a hybrid electrocoagulation/electrodialysis process,” Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., vol. 104, pp. 43–50, 2016.
• M. Uǧurlu, A. Gürses, Ç. Doǧar, and M. Yalçin, “The removal of lignin and phenol from paper mill effluents by electrocoagulation,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 420–428, 2008.
• M. Kobya, E. Senturk, and M. Bayramoglu, “Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewaters by electrocoagulation,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 133, no. 1–3, pp. 172–176, 2006.
• C. Sarala, “Domestic Wastewater Treatment by Electrocoagulation with Fe-Fe Electrodes,” Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 530–533, 2012.
• S. Barişçi and O. Turkay, “Domestic greywater treatment by electrocoagulation using hybrid electrode combinations,” J. Water Process Eng., vol. 10, pp. 56–66, 2016.
• F. Ilhan, U. Kurt, O. Apaydin, and M. T. Gonullu, “Treatment of leachate by electrocoagulation using aluminum and iron electrodes,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 154, no. 1–3, pp. 381–389, 2008.
• S. Top, E. Sekman, S. Hoşver, and M. S. Bilgili, “Characterization and electrocaogulative treatment of nanofiltration concentrate of a full-scale landfill leachate treatment plant,” Desalination, vol. 268, no. 1–3, pp. 158–162, 2011.
• O. T. Can and M. Bayramoglu, “The effect of process conditions on the treatment of benzoquinone solution by electrocoagulation,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 173, no. 1–3, pp. 731–736, 2010.
• E. Demirbas and M. Kobya, “Operating cost and treatment of metalworking fluid wastewater by chemical coagulation and electrocoagulation processes,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 105, pp. 79–90, 2017.
• I. A. Şengil, S. Kulaç, and M. Özacar, “Treatment of tannery liming drum wastewater by electrocoagulation,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 167, no. 1–3, pp. 940–946, 2009.
• P. K. Holt, G. W. Barton, M. Wark, and C. A. Mitchell, “A quantitative comparison between chemical dosing and electrocoagulation,” Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., vol. 211, no. 2–3, pp. 233–248, 2002.