CAMOUFLAGE TREATMENT OF A NONGROWING CLASS III PATIENT BY USING SKELETAL ANCHORAGE (CASE REPORT)

Yıl 2015, Supplement 10, 71 - 75, 21.05.2015

Bilge Cantürk Mevlüt Çelikoğlu Celal Çandırlı

https://doi.org/10.17567/dfd.25925

Öz

The aim of the present study is to present skeletal and dental treatment outcomes of a nongrowing patient with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated using skeletal anchorage. A 15 year-old female patient had applied to our clinic for orthodontic treatment with chief complaint of her lower teeth being protrusive. Clinic and radiographic examination of the patient showed that she had a straight profile with dental and skeletal Class III relationship. Since she had straight profile, edge to edge anterior tooth relationship and, chose compensation therapy choice, we decided to treat Class III malocclusion using miniplates inserted on zygomathic buttress for the use of Class III elastics. After leveling of maxillary and mandibular teeth, intermaxillary class III elastics between miniplates and lower canines were applied for 6 months. After 15 months of total treatment time, Class I canine and molar relationships were established. Orthodontic camouflage treatment of a nongrowing patient was successfully performed in a short time with miniplate anchorage

Anahtar Kelimeler

Class III, Skeletal anchorage, Camouflage treatment

BÜYÜME VE GELİŞİMİ TAMAMLANMIŞ OLAN SINIF III BİR HASTANIN İSKELETSEL ANKRAJ KULLANARAK KAMUFLAJ TEDAVİSİ (OLGU SUNUMU)

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı iskeletsel Sınıf III malokluzyona sahip büyüme ve gelişimi tamamlanmış olan bir hastanın iskeletsel ankraj kullanılarak yapılan tedavi sonuçlarını sunmaktır.

15 yaşındaki bayan hasta alt dişlerinin protrüze olması şikayetiyle ortodontik tedavi için kliniğimize başvurmuştur. Hastanın klinik ve radyografik incele- meleri, hastanın dental ve iskeletsel Sınıf III ilişki ile birlikte düz bir profile sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Hastanın düz bir profile, anteriorda baş başa keser ilişkisine sahip olmasından ve kendisinin kompansas- yon tedavi seçeneğini tercih etmesinden dolayı Sınıf III elastiğin kullanımı için zigomatik buttress bölgesine yerleştirilen miniplakların kullanımı ile Sınıf III malok- luzyonun tedavisine karar verilmiştir. Maksiller ve mandibular dişlerin seviyelenmesinden sonra 6 ay boyunca miniplaklar ile mandibular kanin dişler arasına intermaksiller Sınıf III elastik uygulanmıştır. 15 aylık toplam tedavi süresi sonunda Sınıf I molar ve kanin ilişki elde edilmiştir.

Büyüme ve gelişimi tamamlanmış olan bir hastanın ortodontik kamuflaj tedavisi, miniplak ankrajı ile kısa bir sürede başarılı bir şekilde yapılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sınıf III, İskeletsel ankraj, Kamuflaj tedavisi

Kaynakça

• Janson G, De Souza JE, Barros SE, Andrade P, Nakamura AY. Orthodontic Treatment Alternative to a Class III Subdivision Malocclusion. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:354-63.
• Çelikoğlu M, Kiki A, Oktay H. İskeletsel Sınıf III Malokluzyonun Erken Dönem Tedavisi (Vaka Raporu). Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009;19:192-7.
• Guyer EC, Ellis EE, McNamara A, Behrents RG. Components of Class Iii Malocclusion in Juveniles and Adolescents. Angle Orthod 1986;56:7-30.
• Williams S, Andersen CE. The Morphology of the Potential Class Iii Skeletal Pattern in the Growing Child. Am J Orthod 1986;89:302-11.
• Ngan P, Yiu C, Hu A, Hagg U, Wei S H, Gunel E. Cephalometric and Occlusal Changes Following Maxillary Expansion and Protraction. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:237-54.
• Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK. The Effects of Maxillary Protraction Therapy with or without Rapid Palatal Expansion: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:299-309.
• Troy BA, Shanker S, Fields HW, Vig K, Johnston W. Comparison of Incisor Inclination in Patients with Class III Malocclusion Treated with Orthognathic Surgery or Orthodontic Camouflage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135;146:46-7.
• Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsukada H, Chu S. Dentoalveolar Compensation in Negative 2000;70:145-8. Angle Orthod
• Lin J, Gu Y. Preliminary Investigation of Nonsurgical Treatment of Severe Skeletal Class III Malocclusion in the Permanent Dentition. Angle Orthod 2003;73:401-10.
• Schoenwetter R. Nonsurgical Class III Orthodontic Treatment. Angle Orthod 1977;47:147-55.
• Sperry TP, Speidel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms FW. The Role of Dental Compensations in the Orthodontic Treatment of Mandibular Prognathism Angle Orthod 1977;47:293-9.
• Jing Y, Han X, Guo Y, Li J, Bai D. Nonsurgical Correction of a Class III Malocclusion in an Adult by Miniscrew-Assisted Mandibular Dentition Distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:877-87.
• Cao L, Zhang K, Bai D, Jing Y, Tian Y, Guo Y. Effect of Maxillary Incisor Labiolingual Inclination and Anteroposterior Position on Smiling Profile Esthetics. Angle Orthod 2011;81:121-9.
• He S, Gao J, Wamalwa P, Wang Y, Zou S, Chen S. Camouflage Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Multiloop Edgewise Arch Wire and Modified Class III Elastics by Maxillary Mini- Implant Anchorage. Angle Orthod 2013; 83:630- 40.
• Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. 4 ed St Louis; CV Mosby: 1992. p. 686-718.
• Ellis E, McNamara JA. Components of Adult Class III Malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984; 42:295-305.
• Sugawara Y, Kuroda S, Tamamura N, and Takano- Yamamoto T. Adult Patient with Mandibular Protrusion and Unstable Occlusion Treated with Titanium Screw Anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:102-11.
• Carano A, Velo S, Leone P, Siciliani G. Clinical Applications of the Miniscrew Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:9-24.
• Chung KR, Kim SH, Kang YG, Nelson G. Orthodontic Miniplate with Tube as an Efficient Tool for Borderline Cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:551-62.