Enerji Politikalarında Denge Arayışı, ABD - Rusya ve Avrupa Birliği Üçgeni: TürkAkım Projesinin Belirleyici Faktörleri

Öz

Akamete uğrayan Güney Akım projesi sonrasında, Rusya ve Türkiye tarafından desteklenen TürkAkım projesi, Avrupa’nın  doğal gaz tedarik hacmini güney rotası üzerinden iki katına çıkarmayı hedeflemektedir. ABD’nin, Kremlin’in politikalarının Avrupa Birliği’nin Rusya doğalgazına olan bağımlılığını artırmayı hedeflediğini savunmasına rağmen Avrupa Birliği’ne üye bazı ülkeler yalnızca TürkAkım’ı değil, aynı zamanda Kuzey Akım’ı da kendileri açısından olumlu görmektedirler. Bu makalede TürkAkım projesinin temel belirleyicileri ortaya çıkarılacak ve projenin ABD, Rusya ve Avrupa Birliği’nde nezdindeki dış politika yansımaları uluslararası ilişkiler literatüründe bulunan güvenlikleştirme teorisi çerçevesinde analiz edilecektir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Enerji Güvenliği,Güney Akım,TürkAkım,Kuzey Akım 2,Enerji Bağımlılığı

References

1. Ahval News. (2018) Putin and Erdogan Inaugurate New TurkStream Pipeline in Istanbul https://ahvalnews.com/turkstream/putin-and-erdogan-inaugurate-new-turkstream-pipeline-istanbul (Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2019).
2. Aoun, Marie-Claire. (2015) European Energy Security Challenges and Global Energy Trends: Old Wine in New Bottles?, Istituto Affari Internazionali. http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1503.pdf
3. Baev, P. K. (2010) The South Stream versus Nabucco pipeline race: geopolitical and economic (ir)rationales and political stakes in mega-projects, International Affairs, 86 (5), 1075-1090.
4. Baran, Z. (2008). Security Aspects of the South Stream Project. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2008/388962/EXPO-AFET_NT%282008%29388962_EN.pdf
5. Barysch, K. (2010) Should the Nabucco pipeline project be shelved? Centre for European Reform, Policy Brief , Transatlantic Academy. https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/pb_nabucco_5may10-221.pdf
6. Baumann, F. (2008) Energy security as a multidimensional concept, CAP Policy Analysis, Research Group on International Affairs, No.1 Mart 2008.
7. Boersmam, T. and C. Johnson (2018) U.S. Energy Diplomacy Centre on Global Energy Policy, https://energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/pictures/CGEPUSEnergyDiplomacy218.pdf
8. Buzan, B. (1991) People, States and Fear: an Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-cold War Era, Harvester Wheatsheaf.

9. Buzan, B. and Wæver, O. (2003) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Buzan, B. et al. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis,. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
11. Cherp, A., J. Jewell (2014) The Concept of Energy Security: Beyond the Four as, Energy Policy Journal 75 (December), 415-421.
12. Daily Sabah. (2018) TurkStream Natural Gas Pipeline to Reinforce Turkey’s Role in Energy Trade, Boost European Energy Security https://www.dailysabah.com/energy/2018/11/19/turkstream-natural-gas-pipeline-to-reinforce-turkeys-role-in-energy-trade-boost-european-energy-security (Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2019).
13. Euractiv, US Warns Hungary and Neighbours against Turkish Stream https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/us-warns-hungary-and-neighbors-against-turkish-stream/ (Erişim Tarihi: 09.01.2019).
14. European Commission (2018) EU-US Joint Statement of 25 Temmuz: European Union Imports of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Are on the Rise. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4920_en.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 05.01.2019).
15. European Energy Security Strategy. (2014). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0330&from=EN (Erişim Tarihi: 19.12.2018).
16. Eurostat. (2018) EU Imports of Energy Products – Recent Developments, Statistics Explained. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/46126.pdf
17. Eroukhmanoff, C. (2017). Securitisation Theory. Stephen McGlinchey, Rosie Walters and Christian Scheinpflug (Ed.), International Relations Theory,(ss.104-110)içinde. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing.
18. Floyd, R. (2007), Human Security and the Copenhagen School’s Securitization Approach: Conceptualizing Human Security as a Securitizing Move, Human Security Journal, 5(Winter), 38-49.
19. Franza, L. (2015) From South Stream to Turk Stream, Clingendael International Energy Programme, https://www.clingendaelenergy.com/inc/upload/files/CIEP_paper_2015-05_web_1.pdf
20. Galeotti, M. (2015) Why Did It Take Turkey Just 17 Seconds to Shoot Down Russian Jet?, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/26/russia-turkey-jet-mark-galeotti (Erişim Tarihi: 09.12.2018).
21. Gazprom. TurkStream, Gas exports to Turkey and southern and southeastern Europe. http://www.gazprom.com/projects/turk-stream/ (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2019).
22. Gotev, G. (2018), US Warns Hungary and Neighbours against Turkish Stream. https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/us-warns-hungary-and-neighbors-against-turkish-stream/ (Erişim Tarihi: 15.12.2018).
23. Gotev, G. (2017) EU-Gazprom Deal Clears Bulgaria of South Stream Cancellation claimshttps://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/eu-gazprom-deal-clears-bulgaria-of-south-stream-cancellation-claims/ (Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2018).
24. Hegedüs, D. (2015) How Should Europe Respond to Russia?. https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_how_should_europe_respond_to_russia_the_hungarian_view406
25. Hogg, J. (2015), EU Energy Chief Voices Concern over Russia’s Turkish Pipeline Plan. https://www.reuters.com/article/turkey-europe-russia-gas/eu-energy-chief-voices-concern-over-russias-turkish-pipeline-plan-idUSL6N0WJ1FM20150317 (Erişim Tarihi: 09.02.2019).
26. Huotari, J. (2011) Energy Policy and (Energy Security) as a Part of Russian Foreign Policy, Nordia Geographical Publications, 40 (4), 121-132. International Energy Agency. Energy Security. https://www.iea.org/topics/energysecurity/. (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2019).
27. Irie, K. (2017) The Evolution of the Energy Security Concept and APEX Energy Cooperation. Singapore Issue 2017. Clevaland: International Association for Energy Economics.
28. Juan Carrion, C. et al. (2016). The Response of Turkey and Russia after Jet Crisis and the Implications for the South Caucasus, Baku: Center for Economic & Social Development.
29. Koch, F. (2015) Turkish Stream and its implications for the EU. http://aei.pitt.edu/64786/1/EPB-34.pdf
30. Korteweg, R. (2018) Energy as a Tool of Foreign Policy of Authoritarian States, in Particular Russia. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/603868/EXPO_STU(2018)603868_EN.pdf
31. Köstem, S. (2018), The Political Economy of Turkish-Russian Relations: Dynamics of Asymmetric Independence, Perceptions, XXIII (2), 10-32.
32. Lambert, J.H. et al. (2011) Energy Security for Industrial and Military Installations: Emergent Conditions that Influence the Strategic Selection of Technologies, Gheorghe, Adrian V. ve Muresan, Liviu (Ed.), Energy Security: International and Local Issues - Theoretical Perspectives, and Critical Energy Infrastructures, (ss.317-331) içinde. Berlin: Springer.
33. Lohmann, S. and K. Westphal (2019) US-Russia Policy Hits European Energy Supply, SWP Comment 2019/C No.6. Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP).
34. Marini, A. (2014) EU Has Circles Bulgaria on the Geopolitical Napkin. http://www.euinside.eu/en/analyses/bulgaria-south-stream-boyko-borissov-juncker (Erişim Tarihi: 25.12.2018).
35. Markovic, F. (2017). Energy strategy of Russia in the Western Balkans, Energy and Environmental Policy Laboratory. Working Paper 7, Piraeus: University of Piraeus.
36. Mete, G. (2017) TurkStream Pipeline Project: An Analysis of Legal, Financial and Technical Aspects. Vol.3, İlkbahar 2017. London: EUCERS.
37. Møller, B. (2000) The Concept of Security: The Pros and Cons of Expansion and Contraction, Presented at 18th General Conference of the International Peace Research Association. Tampere: International Peace Research Association (IPRA).
38. Munteanu, D. and C. Sarno (2016) South Stream and Nord Stream 2 – Implications for the European Energy Security, No.2. Lisbon: Análise Europeia,
39. Nuttall, W., Samaras, C., & Bazilian, M. (2017). Energy and the Military: Convergence of Security, Economic, and Environmental Decision-Making. EPRG Working Paper. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.17547
40. Nutall W. J. et al. (2017). Energy and the Military: Convergence of Security, Economic, and Environmental Decision-Making, EPRG Working Paper 1717, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
41. Popescu, M-F. (2015). The Economics and Finance of Energy Security, Procedia Economics and Finance. 27, 467-473.
42. Proedrou, F. (2018). Russian Energy Policy and Structural Power in Europe, Europe-Asia Studies. 70 (2018), 75-89.
43. Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. (2016). Russia, Turkey Sign Gas Pipeline Deal. https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-turkey-putin-erdogan-azerbaijan-aliyev-istanbul/28043861.html (Erişim Tarihi: 15.01.2019).
44. Rodova, J. (2011), Russia, Bulgaria Sign Final Investment Decision on South Stream Gas Pipeline https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/natural-gas/111512-russia-bulgaria-sign-final-investment-decision-on-south-stream-gas-pipeline (Erişim Tarihi: 15.01.2019).
45. Russian National Security Strategy (2015). http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/OtrasPublicaciones/Internacional/2016/Russian-National-Security-Strategy-31Dec2015.pdf
46. Sauvageot, E. P. (2011). Energy Disputes between Russia and Ukraine: A Case Study of Russian Decision-Making. https://ecpr.eu/filestore/paperproposal/3d7d0dcd-1e93-48fb-9a97-001d91dab1bb.pdf
47. Sharples, Jack. (2015). South Stream: Gazprom Abandons the Project and Announces a New Gas Pipeline to Turkey. European Union Foreign Affairs Journal. 41-55.
48. Smith, K. C. (2008). Russia and European Energy Security, Divide and Dominate. Washington DC: Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
49. Stevens, P. (2010). The 'Shale Gas Revolution': Hype and Reality, Chatham House Report. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Energy%2C%20Environment%20and%20Development/r_0910stevens.pdf
50. Taureck, R. (2006). Securitisation Theory and Securitisation Studies. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1082/1/WRAP_Floyd_Securitization_theory_and_securitization_studies_WRAP.pdf
51. Varol, T. (2013). The Russian Foreign Energy Policy. Kocani: European Scientific Institute.
52. Williams, M. C. (2003). Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics, The International Studies Association, 47 (4), 511-531.
53. Wolfers, A. (1962). National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol, in Idem: Discord and Collaboration. Arnold Wolfers (Ed.), Essays on International Politics, (ss.147-165) içinde. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1962).
54. Yergin, D. (1998). Ensuring Energy Security in the 1990. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1988-09-01/energy-security-1990s