Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Örgütsel Özdeşleşmeye Etkisi: Psikolojik Güvenliğin Aracı Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel özdeşlemeye etki eden unsurları araştırmaktır. Bu bağlamda algılanan örgütsel desteğin örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisi ve bu etkide psikolojik güvenliğin aracı rol üstlenip üstlenmediği incelenmiştir. Hipotezlerin test edilmesi amacıyla bir kamu üniversitesinde çalışan 195 üniversite personelinden anket yardımıyla veriler toplanmıştır. Analiz bulgularına göre algılanan örgütsel desteğin örgütsel özdeşleşmeyle olumlu ve anlamlı yönde bir ilişkiye sahip olduğu ve ayrıca psikolojik güvenliğin bu ilişkide kısmi bir aracı rol üstlendiği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Örgütsel destek,örgütsel özdeşleşme

The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support On Organizational Identification: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the factors impacting organizational identification. In this context, the effect of perceived organizational support on organizational identification and in this effect mediated by psychological safety are addressed. To test the hypotheses, data were gathered through a survey conducted on 195 employees working at a public üniversity. According to the findings of the research perceived organizational support positively affects organizational identification and it was observed that the effect of perceived organizational support on organizational identification is partially mediated by psychological safety

References

1. Angle, H.L. ve Perry, J. L., (1983), "Organizational Commitment: Individual and Organizational Influences”, Work and Occupations, 10, 123-146.
2. Ashforth, B. E. ve Mael, F., (1989),"Social Identity Theory and The Organization”, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
3. Baron, R.M. ve Kenny, D.A., (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
4. Cheney, G., (1983), "On The Various and Changing Meanings of Organizational Membership: A Field Study of Organizational Identification”, Communication Monographs, 50, 342-362.
5. Corman, S. R. ve Scott, C. R., (1994),"Perceived Networks, Activity Foci, and Observable Communication in Social Collectives", Communication Theory, 4, 171-190.
6. Cropanzano, R. ve Mitchell, M. S., (2005),"Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review", Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
7. Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M.ve Harquail, C. V., (1994),"Organizational images and member identification”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(June). 239-263.
8. Edmondson, A., (1999), “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (2), 350–383.

9. Edmondson, A. C., (2003),"Speaking Up in The Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams”, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419.
10. Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S.ve Lynch, P., (1997),"Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment, and Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 812-820.
11. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. ve Sowa, D., (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psycology, 7, 500–507.
12. Hall, D.T., Schneider, B. ve Nygren, H.T. (1970), "Personal Factors in Organizational Identification”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 176-190.
13. Johnson, W. L., Johnson, A. M.ve Heimberg, F., (1999), "A Primaryand Second-Order Component Analysis of the Organizational Identification Questionnaire”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 159.
14. Kahn, W. A., (1990),"Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
15. Katz, D. ve Kahn, R., (1978),"The Social Psychology of Organizations", John Wiley & Sons, 1-840.
16. Kerse G. ve Karabey C. N., (2017), "Algılanan Örgütsel Desteğin Örgütsel Özdeşleşmeye Etkisi: Örgütsel Sinizmin Aracı Rolü”, MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(4), 375-396.
17. Lee, F., Edmondson, A. C., Thomke, S. ve Worline, M., (2004), "The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations", Organization Science, 15(3),310–326.
18. Liang, J., C. Farh, C. I. ve Farh, J. L., (2012), "Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination", Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-73.
19. May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., ve Harter, L. M., (2004),"The Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness, Safety and Availability and The Engagement of the Human Spirit at Work", New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Riggle, R. J., Edmondson, D. R. ve Hansen, J. D., (2009),"A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Support and Job Outcomes: 20 Years of Research”, Journal of Business Research, 62(10),1027-1030.
21. Sakal Ö., (2018), "Kamuda “İyi İdare” Perspektifinde Hizmetkâr Liderlik, Psikolojik Güvenlik ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi”, Ombudsman Akademik, Özel Sayı 1, 259-293
22. Schein, E. H. ve Bennis, W. G., (1965),"Personal and Organizational Change Through Group Meth Ods: The Laboratory Approach", John Wiley & Son, New York, 1-376. Tajfel, H., (1981), "Human Group and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology”, New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Turunç Ö. ve Çelik M., (2010),"Çalışanların Algıladıkları Örgütsel Destek ve İş Stresinin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İş Performansına Etkisi", Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 17(2), 183-206.