Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis
BibTex RIS Cite

Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases

Year 2014, Volume: 67 Issue: 1, 17 - 20, 18.03.2015
https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY

Abstract

Aim: In most of the diffuse interstitial lung diseases (DILD), bronchoalveolar lavage findings are not specific. When all of the non-invasive methods are insufficient, more invasive methods may be needed for DILD diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of bronchoscopic and surgical biopsies in DILD.

Material-Methods: One hundred and forty subjects (80F/60M; mean age=53.25±16.14 years) with DILD were evaluated retrospectively. The diagnostic methods and the results of biopsy samples obtained via fiberoptic bronchoscopy and surgery were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed by using the SPSS version 11.0, any p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The diagnoses of subjects were idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) (n=76), sarcoidosis (n=37) and ILDs due to other reasons (n=27). Totally 110 bronchoscopic biopsies (64 transbronchial lung biopsies (TBLB) and 49 bronchial mucosal biopsies (BMB)) were taken. Surgical biopsies were performed in 31 cases (surgical lung biopsy (n=13) (SLB), mediastinoscopy (n=10), extrapulmonary biopsy (n=8)). The rates of definitive diagnosis for TBLB, BMB, SLB and mediastinoscopy were 26.4% (n=17), 16.3% (n=8), 92.3% (n=12) and 100% (n=10), respectively. In sarcoidosis, TBLB, BMB and SLB were positive in 50% (p=0.07), 42.8% and 75% of subjects. In IIP cases, these techniques yielded positive results in 18.9%, 8.3% and 100% of subjects, respectively.

Conclusion: Transbronchial lung biopsy was more successful in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis than other ILDs. In IIP subjects without any definite diagnosis, surgical lung biopsy is needed.

Ethical Statement

-

Supporting Institution

-

Thanks

-

References

  • 1. Behr J. Approach to the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. Clin Chest Med. 2012; 33(1):1-10.
  • 2. American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161(2 Pt 1):646-664.
  • 3. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. This joint statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) was adopted by the ATS board of directors, June 2001 and by the ERS Executive Committee, June 2001. American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 15; 165(2):277-304.
  • 4. Spectrum of fibrosing diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Morgenthau AS, Padilla ML. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009; 76:2-23.
  • 5. Kayacan O. Approach of diffuse interstitial lung diseases. Tuberk Toraks. 2004; 52(3):285-299.
  • 6. Popper HH. Which biopsies in diffuse infiltrative lung diseases and when are these necessary? Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 200; 56(5):446-452.
  • 7. Zsiray M, Appel J, Lantos A. Transbronchial biopsy in diffuse infiltrative lung diseases. Orv Hetil. 1999 30; 140(22):1239-1243.
  • 8. Shi JH, Xu WB, Liu HR, et al. The diagnostic value of transbronchial lung biopsy in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2008; 31:22-25.
  • 9. Kulshrestha R, Menon BK, Rajkumar, Vijayan VK. Role of a pattern-based approach in interpretation of transbronchoscopic lung biopsy and its clinical implications. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2012; 54(1):9-17.
  • 10. Kvale PA. Bronchoscopic biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1996; 6(2):205-222.
  • 11. Szlubowski A, Soja J, Kuzdza􀃢 J, et al. Transbronchial lung biopsy as a diagnostic method of diffuse pulmonary diseases. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2004; 72(5-6):165-169.
  • 12. Danila E, Zurauskas E, Loskutoviene G, et al. Significance of bronchoscopic lung biopsy in clinical practice. Adv Med Sci. 2008; 53(1):11-16.
  • 13. Ibrahim AS, Allangawi MH, Sattar HA, Mobyed HS, Almohammed AA. Indications, diagnostic yields and complications of transbronchial biopsy over 5 years in the State of Qatar. Saudi Med J. 2005; 26(4):641-645.
  • 14. Glaspole IN(1), Wells AU, du Bois RM. Lung biopsy in diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2001; 56(3):225-232.
  • 15. Nguyen W, Meyer KC. Surgical lung biopsy for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: a review of the literature and recommendations for optimizing safety and efficacy. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2013; 30(1):3-16.
  • 16. Rizzato G. The role of thoracic surgery in diagnosing interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 1999; 5(5):284- 286.

Difüz İnterstisyel Akciğer Hastalıklarında Farklı Biyopsi Tekniklerinin Tanısal Değeri

Year 2014, Volume: 67 Issue: 1, 17 - 20, 18.03.2015
https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY

Abstract

Amaç Bir çok difüz interstisyel akciğer hastalıklarında (DİAH), bronkoalveolar lavaj bulguları spesifik değildir. Tüm non-invaziv yöntemler yetersiz olduğunda, DİAH tanısı için daha invaziv yöntemler gerekli olabilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; DİAH'da bronkoskopik ve cerrahi biyopsilerin tanısal etkinliğini değerlendirmektir.

Yöntem: DİAH olan 140 hasta (80K/60E; ortalama yaş:53.25±16.14 yıl) retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Tanısal yöntemler ve fiberoptik bronkoskopi veya cerrahiyle elde edilen biyopsi örneklerinin sonuçları kaydedildi. İstatistiki analizler SPSS 11,0 versiyonu kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi, p<0,05 anlamlı kabul edildi.

Bulgular: Olguların tanıları idiyopatik interstisyel pnömoni (İİP) (n = 76) , sarkoidoz (n = 37) ve diğer nedenlere bağlı İAH (n = 27) idi. Toplam 110 bronkoskopik biyopsi (64 transbronşial akciğer biyopsisi (TBAB) ve 49 bronşial mukozal biyopsi (BMB)) alındı. Cerrahi biyopsiler 31 olguda gerçekleştirildi (cerrahi akciğer biyopsisi (n = 13) (CAB), mediastinoskopi (n = 10) , ekstrapulmoner biyopsi (n = 8) ) . Kesin tanı oranları TBAB, BMB,CAB ve mediastinoskopi için sırasıyla %26,4 (n = 17) %16,3 (n = 8) , %92,3 (n = 12) ve %100 (n = 10) idi. Sarkoidozda TBAB, BMB ve CAB, %50 (p=0,07), %42,8 ve %75 olguda pozitifti. İİP olgularında ise bu teknikler sırasıyla %18.9, % 8.3 ve %100 olguda pozitif sonuç verdi.

Sonuç Transbronşial akciğer biyopsisi diğer interstiyel akciğer hastalıklarına göre sarkoidoz tanısında daha başarılıdır. Kesin tanı konulamayan IIP olgularında cerrahi akciğer biyopsisi gereklidir.

Ethical Statement

-

Supporting Institution

-

Thanks

-

References

  • 1. Behr J. Approach to the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. Clin Chest Med. 2012; 33(1):1-10.
  • 2. American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161(2 Pt 1):646-664.
  • 3. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. This joint statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) was adopted by the ATS board of directors, June 2001 and by the ERS Executive Committee, June 2001. American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 15; 165(2):277-304.
  • 4. Spectrum of fibrosing diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Morgenthau AS, Padilla ML. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009; 76:2-23.
  • 5. Kayacan O. Approach of diffuse interstitial lung diseases. Tuberk Toraks. 2004; 52(3):285-299.
  • 6. Popper HH. Which biopsies in diffuse infiltrative lung diseases and when are these necessary? Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 200; 56(5):446-452.
  • 7. Zsiray M, Appel J, Lantos A. Transbronchial biopsy in diffuse infiltrative lung diseases. Orv Hetil. 1999 30; 140(22):1239-1243.
  • 8. Shi JH, Xu WB, Liu HR, et al. The diagnostic value of transbronchial lung biopsy in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2008; 31:22-25.
  • 9. Kulshrestha R, Menon BK, Rajkumar, Vijayan VK. Role of a pattern-based approach in interpretation of transbronchoscopic lung biopsy and its clinical implications. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2012; 54(1):9-17.
  • 10. Kvale PA. Bronchoscopic biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1996; 6(2):205-222.
  • 11. Szlubowski A, Soja J, Kuzdza􀃢 J, et al. Transbronchial lung biopsy as a diagnostic method of diffuse pulmonary diseases. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2004; 72(5-6):165-169.
  • 12. Danila E, Zurauskas E, Loskutoviene G, et al. Significance of bronchoscopic lung biopsy in clinical practice. Adv Med Sci. 2008; 53(1):11-16.
  • 13. Ibrahim AS, Allangawi MH, Sattar HA, Mobyed HS, Almohammed AA. Indications, diagnostic yields and complications of transbronchial biopsy over 5 years in the State of Qatar. Saudi Med J. 2005; 26(4):641-645.
  • 14. Glaspole IN(1), Wells AU, du Bois RM. Lung biopsy in diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2001; 56(3):225-232.
  • 15. Nguyen W, Meyer KC. Surgical lung biopsy for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: a review of the literature and recommendations for optimizing safety and efficacy. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2013; 30(1):3-16.
  • 16. Rizzato G. The role of thoracic surgery in diagnosing interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 1999; 5(5):284- 286.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Chest Diseases
Journal Section Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis
Authors

Nalan Demir 0000-0002-3168-9176

Ayperi Öztürk 0000-0003-0692-4784

Serap Unculu This is me

Demet Karnak This is me 0000-0001-8463-9802

Oya Kayacan This is me 0000-0001-5842-4226

Publication Date March 18, 2015
IZ https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 67 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Demir, N., Öztürk, A., Unculu, S., Karnak, D., & Kayacan, O. (2015). Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 67(1), 17-20. https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY
AMA 1.Demir N, Öztürk A, Unculu S, Karnak D, Kayacan O. Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2015;67(1):17-20. https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY
Chicago Demir, Nalan, Ayperi Öztürk, Serap Unculu, Demet Karnak, and Oya Kayacan. 2015. “Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 67 (1): 17-20. https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY.
EndNote Demir N, Öztürk A, Unculu S, Karnak D, Kayacan O (March 1, 2015) Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 67 1 17–20.
IEEE [1]N. Demir, A. Öztürk, S. Unculu, D. Karnak, and O. Kayacan, “Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 17–20, Mar. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY
ISNAD Demir, Nalan - Öztürk, Ayperi - Unculu, Serap - Karnak, Demet - Kayacan, Oya. “Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 67/1 (March 1, 2015): 17-20. https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY.
JAMA 1.Demir N, Öztürk A, Unculu S, Karnak D, Kayacan O. Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2015;67:17–20.
MLA Demir, Nalan, et al. “Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 67, no. 1, Mar. 2015, pp. 17-20, https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY.
Vancouver 1.Nalan Demir, Ayperi Öztürk, Serap Unculu, Demet Karnak, Oya Kayacan. Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası [Internet]. 2015 Mar. 1;67(1):17-20. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY