Effects of algae derived pure β–Glucan on In vitro rumen fermentation

Abstract

The major purpose of this study was to determine how varying doses of algae-derived pure β–glucan affected in vitro gas generation, volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations, methane production, and protozoa populations. Different doses of β–glucan [i.e., 0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg/kg feed (DM basis)] were applied to corn silage as experimental treatments. After 6–96 hours of incubation, the dose of 200 mg/kg of DM β–glucan reduced total gas production compared to control (P<0.01). The concentration of total VFA decreased quadratically (P<0.01) as the amount of β–glucan inclusion decreased (except for 200 mg/kg DM) when compared to the control group. The total VFA concentration was found to be the lowest (P<0.01) at 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg DM β–glucan than the other doses. Propionate and butyrate concentrations increased linearly (P<0.01) in the β–glucan supplemented groups, except for the 50 mg/kg DM dosage. When compared to the control group, all doses of β–glucans lowered acetate and the acetate: propionate ratio linearly and quadratically (P<0.01). The addition of β–glucans reduced the number of protozoa linearly (except at the lowest dose) and reduced the methane generation linearly and quadratically (P<0.01). The concentration of NH3-N did not differ (Linear, P=0.12; Quadratic, P=0.19) between treatments. The key findings were that β–glucan acted as a rumen modulator, and levels of more than 50 mg/kg of feed DM functioned as a potential methane regulator in the rumen due to reduced acetate and acetate to propionate ratio.

Keywords

• β–glucan
• in vitro
• methane production
• rumen fermentation

References

1. Amábile-Cuevas CF, Cárdenas-García M, Ludgar M (1995): Antibiotic-resistance. Am Sci, 83, 320-329.
2. AOAC (1990): Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
3. Armstrong DG, Blaxter KL (1957): The utilization of acetic, propionic and butyric acids by fattening sheep. Br J Nutr, 11, 413-425.
4. Baker SK (1999): Rumen methanogens, and inhibition of methanogenesis. Aust J Agric Res, 50, 1293-1298.
5. Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’Mara F, et al (2008): Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust J Exp Agric, 48, 21-27.
6. Boyne AW, Eadie JM, Raitt K (1957): The development and testing of a method of counting rumen protozoa. J Gen Microbiol, 17, 414-423.
7. Chen KL, Weng BC, Chang MT, et al (2008): Direct enhancement of the phagocytic and bactericidal capability of abdominal macrophage of chicks by beta-1,3-1,6-glucan. Poult Sci, 87, 2242-2249.
8. Cherdthong A, Seankamsorn A, Suriyapha C, et al (2018): Effect of beta-glucan supplementation on feed intake, digestibility of nutrients and ruminal fermentation in Thai native beef cattle. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 102, 1509-1514.

9. Cox CM, Stuard LH, Kim S, et al (2010): Performance and immune responses to dietary beta-glucan in broiler chicks. Poult Sci, 89, 1924-1933.
10. Daniells S (2006): Beta-glucan from algae: ‘It’s a simpler, more bioavailable, and better priced product’. Avaliable at https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com. (Accessed December 28, 2021).
11. Donovan DC, Franklin ST, Chase CC, et al (2002): Growth and health of Holstein calves fed milk replacers supplemented with antibiotics or Enteroguard. J Dairy Sci, 85, 947-950.
12. Eicher SD, McKee CA, Carroll JA, et al (2006): Supplemental vitamin C and yeast cell wall beta glucan as growth enhancers in newborn pigs and as immunomodulators after an endotoxin challenge after weaning. J Anim Sci, 84, 2352-2360.
13. Finlay BJ, Esteban G, Clarke KJ, et al (1994): Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 117, 157-162.
14. Grove AV, Kaiser CR, Iversen N, et al (2006): Digestibility of barley beta‐glucan in beef cattle. Proceedings of Western Section, J Anim Sci, 57, 367-369.
15. Khalkhane AS, Abbasi K, Zadeh FS, et al (2013): Effect of dietary beta-glucan supplementation on humoral and cellular immunologic factors in lambs. Global Vet, 11, 38-43.
16. Kido K, Tejima S, Haramiishi M, et al (2019): Provision of beta-glucan prebiotics (cellooligosaccharides and kraft pulp) to calves from pre- to post-weaning period on pasture. Anim Sci J, 90, 1537-1543.
17. Kinley RD, Vucko MJ, Machado L, et al (2016): The red macroalgae Asparagopsistaxiformis is a potent natural antimethanogenic that reduces methane production during in vitro fermentation with rumen fluid. Anim Prod Sci, 56, 282-289.
18. Kopecny J, Wallace RJ (1982): Cellular location and some properties of proteolytic enzymes of rumen bacteria. Appl Environ Microb, 43, 1026-1033.
19. Ma T, Tu Y, Zhang N, et al (2015): Effects of dietary yeast β‐glucan on nutrient digest‐ ibility and serum profiles in pre‐ruminant Holstein calves. J Integrative Agr, 14, 749-757.
20. Mao XF, Piao XS, Lai CH, et al (2005): Effects of β-glucan obtained from the Chinese herb Astragalus membranaceus and lipopolysaccharide challenge on performance, immunological, adrenal, and somatotropic responses of weanling pigs. J Anim Sci, 83, 2775-2782.
21. Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M (2010): Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Anim, 4, 351-365.
22. Menke KH, Steingass H (1987): Schtzung des energetischen futterwerts aus der in vitro mit pansensaft bestimmten gasbildung und der chemischen analyse. II. Regressions gleichungen. Übers Tierernӓhrg, 15, 59-94.
23. Menke KH, Steingass H (1988): Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Develop, 28, 7-55.
24. Newbold CJ, Lassalas B, Jouany JP (1995): The importance of methanogenesis associated with ciliate protozoa in ruminal methane production in vitro. Lett Appl Microbiol, 21, 230-234.
25. Orskov ER, McDonald I (1979): The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurement weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci, 92, 499-507.
26. Polyorach S, Wanapat M, Cherdthong A (2014): Influence of yeast fermented cassava chip protein (YEFECAP) and roughage to concentrate ratio on ruminal fermentation and microorganisms using in vitro gas production technique. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 27, 36-45.
27. Ruiz-Herrera J, Larriba G (1995): High molecular weight precursors of glucans in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 68, 231-235.
28. Ushida K, Miyazaki A, Kawashima R (1987): Effect of defaunation on ruminal gas and VFA production in vitro. Jap J Zootech Sci, 57, 71-77.
29. Ushida K, Tokura M, Takenaka A, et al (1997): Ciliate protozoa and ruminal methanogenesis, in: Onodera R., Itabashi H., Ushida K., Yano H., Sasaki Y. (Eds.), Rumen Microbes & Digestive Physiology in Ruminants. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, pp. 209-220.
30. Vasta V, Daghio M, Cappucci A, et al (2019): Invited review: Plant polyphenols and rumen microbiota responsible for fatty acid biohydrogenation, fiber digestion, and methane emission: Experimental evidence and methodological approaches. J Dairy Sci, 102, 3781-3804.
31. Vogels GD, Hoppe WF, Stumm CK (1980): Association of methanogenic bacteria with rumen ciliates. Appl Environ Microbiol, 40, 608-612.
32. Wang Z, Guo Y, Yuan J, et al (2008): Effect of dietary beta 1,3/1,6-glucan supplementation on growth performance, immune response and plasma prostaglandin E-2, growth hormone and ghrelin in weanling piglets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 21, 707-714.
33. Wojcik R (2014): The effect of Leiber Beta-S on selected immunity indicators in calves. Acta Vet Brno, 83, 113-118.
34. Wolin MJ (1960): A theoretical rumen fermentation balance. J Dairy Sci, 43, 1452-1459.
35. Ząbek K, Milewski S, Wójcik R, et al (2013): Effect of β-1, 3/1, 6-D-glucan in diet on productivity and humoral and cellular defense mechanisms in sheep. Acta Vet Brno, 82, 141-146.