Research Article

In vivo and in vitro assessment of ovarian echotexture through computer assisted real time ultrasonography in bitches

Volume: 64 Number: 3 September 1, 2017
  • Güneş Erdoğan
  • Niyazi Küçük
  • Halit Kanca
  • Melih Aksoy
EN TR

In vivo and in vitro assessment of ovarian echotexture through computer assisted real time ultrasonography in bitches

Abstract

In vivo and in vitro assessment of canine ovaries (n=72) were studied by computer assisted real time ultrasonography to analyse the correlation between the ovarian echotexture and serum progesterone (P4) concentration. Pre- and postoperative ovarian images were taken via B-mode ultrasonography, and analysed by an image analysis software package for total area of ovary (A), mean greyness value (MGV), heterogeneity (H), and minimum-maximum pixel value (PR). The ovaries were classified into follicular or luteal stage based upon the serum P4 concentration, vaginal cytology findings, and macroscopic inspection of ovaries postoperatively. The P4 was negatively (P<0.05) correlated with A, H and PR, whereas, it’s correlation with MGV was positive (P<0.05) in follicular stage. Also, parameters A, H and PR were higher (P<0.05) in follicular stage. In vitro parameters of MGV, H and PR were higher (P<0.05) than in vivo parameters in follicular stage. Meanwhile, in luteal stage ovaries, only in vitro MGV was higher than in vivo MGV. In this study, it was observed that the relationship between ovarian echotexture and oestrous stages could be presented numerically. Moreover, the differences between the in vivo and in vitro ovarian images were more prominent in bitches in the follicular stage

Keywords

References

  1. Alacam E, Ay SS, Saban E (2009): The evaluation of various radioimmunoassay progesterone kits for different stage of reproductive period in the cow, sheep and bitch. Vet J Ankara Univ, 56, 37-41.
  2. Bergeron LH, Nykamph SG, Brisson BA, et al. (2013): B-mode ultrasonography for detecting periovulatory events in the bitch. Theriogenology, 79, 274-283. color Doppler
  3. Davies KL, Bartlewski PM, Pierson RA, et al. (2006): Computer assisted image analyses of corpora lutea in relation to peripheral concentrations of progesterone: A comparison between breeds of sheep with different ovulation rates. Anim Reprod Sci, 96, 165-175.
  4. Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Ginther OJ (1998): The suitability of echotexture characteristics of the follicular wall for identifying Theriogenology, 50, 1025-1038. breeding day in mare.
  5. Gastal EL, Gastal MO, Ginther OJ (2006): Relationships of changes in B-mode echotexture and colour-Doppler signals in the wall of the preovulatory follicle to changes in systemic oestradiol concentrations and the effect of human chorionic gonadotropin in mares. Reproduction, 131, 699- 709.
  6. Herzog K, Kiossis E, Bollwein H (2008): Examination of cyclic changes in bovine luteal echotexture using computer– assisted statistical pattern recognition techniques. Anim Reprod Sci, 106, 289-297.
  7. Kayacık V, Salmanoğlu MR, Polat B, et al. (2005): Evaluation of the corpus luteum size throughout the cycle by ultrasonography and progesterone assay in cows. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 29, 1311-1316.
  8. Liu X, Hart EJ, Petrik JJ, et al. (2008): Relationships between histomorphology and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression of bovine antral follicles and corpora lutea ex situ. Reprod Dom Anim, 43, 27-34. image attributes,

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Veterinary Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Güneş Erdoğan This is me

Niyazi Küçük This is me

Halit Kanca This is me

Melih Aksoy This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2017

Submission Date

September 1, 2017

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 64 Number: 3

APA
Erdoğan, G., Küçük, N., Kanca, H., & Aksoy, M. (2017). In vivo and in vitro assessment of ovarian echotexture through computer assisted real time ultrasonography in bitches. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 64(3), 0-2. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002795
AMA
1.Erdoğan G, Küçük N, Kanca H, Aksoy M. In vivo and in vitro assessment of ovarian echotexture through computer assisted real time ultrasonography in bitches. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2017;64(3):0-2. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002795
Chicago
Erdoğan, Güneş, Niyazi Küçük, Halit Kanca, and Melih Aksoy. 2017. “In Vivo and in Vitro Assessment of Ovarian Echotexture through Computer Assisted Real Time Ultrasonography in Bitches”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 64 (3): 0-2. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002795.
EndNote
Erdoğan G, Küçük N, Kanca H, Aksoy M (September 1, 2017) In vivo and in vitro assessment of ovarian echotexture through computer assisted real time ultrasonography in bitches. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 64 3 0–2.
IEEE
[1]G. Erdoğan, N. Küçük, H. Kanca, and M. Aksoy, “In vivo and in vitro assessment of ovarian echotexture through computer assisted real time ultrasonography in bitches”, Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 0–2, Sept. 2017, doi: 10.1501/Vetfak_0000002795.
ISNAD
Erdoğan, Güneş - Küçük, Niyazi - Kanca, Halit - Aksoy, Melih. “In Vivo and in Vitro Assessment of Ovarian Echotexture through Computer Assisted Real Time Ultrasonography in Bitches”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 64/3 (September 1, 2017): 0-2. https://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_0000002795.
JAMA
1.Erdoğan G, Küçük N, Kanca H, Aksoy M. In vivo and in vitro assessment of ovarian echotexture through computer assisted real time ultrasonography in bitches. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2017;64:0–2.
MLA
Erdoğan, Güneş, et al. “In Vivo and in Vitro Assessment of Ovarian Echotexture through Computer Assisted Real Time Ultrasonography in Bitches”. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 64, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 0-2, doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002795.
Vancouver
1.Güneş Erdoğan, Niyazi Küçük, Halit Kanca, Melih Aksoy. In vivo and in vitro assessment of ovarian echotexture through computer assisted real time ultrasonography in bitches. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg. 2017 Sep. 1;64(3):0-2. doi:10.1501/Vetfak_0000002795

Cited By