Effects of genotype on the biomechanical parameters and composition of bone in the laying hen embryos

Abstract

Bone problems are highly prevalent in laying hens. These problems affect the welfare, production and economic losses. Bone development begins in the embryonic period, and if the skeletal system develops well at that time, the subsequent production period can be affected positively. The present experiment aimed to investigate the effect of genotype on biomechanical parameters and composition of bone in the laying hen embryos. For this purpose, 360 fertilized eggs were obtained from two brown (Atak-S and Brown Nick) and two white (Atabey and Nick) layer breeders and incubated. Metatarsus, tibia and femur properties were examined on the embryonic d 19 and 21. Results showed that genotype played an important role in determining the biomechanical properties and mineral composition of the metatarsus, tibia and femur in the embryonic period. Examined bone characteristics improved with embryonic age. The least mineralization was observed in the metatarsus bone. In conclusion, bone properties were influenced from the genotype. However these differences were not related with laying hens being white or brown. The effect of the interaction between genotype and embryonic age on the bone properties should be considered.

Keywords

• Bone
• embryo
• genotype
• laying hen

References

1. 1. Alfonso-Torres KA, Gargaglioni LH, Pizauro JM, et al (2009): Breeder age and bone development in broiler chicken embryos. Braz J Vet. Res Anim Sci, 61, 219-226. 2. Angel R (2007): Metabolic disorders: limitations to growth of and mineral deposition into the broiler skeleton after hatch and potential implications for leg problems. J Appl Poult Res, 16, 138-149.
2. 3. AOAC (2000): Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed, Gaithersburg.
3. 4. Beattie JH, Avenell A (1992): Trace element nutrition and bone metabolism. Nutr Res Rev, 5, 167–188.
4. 5. Boss CB, Fredeen KJ (2004): Concepts, Instrumentation and Techniques in Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry, 3th ed. Perkin Elmer Life and Analytical Sciences, USA.
5. 6. Dawson B, Trapp RG (2001): Basic and Clinical Biostatistics, 3rd ed. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York.
6. 7. Fleming RH, McCormack HA, McTeir L, et al (2006): Relationships between genetic, environmental and nutritional factors influencing osteoporosis in laying hens. Br Poult Sci, 47, 742-755.
7. 8. Forestier-Zhang L, Bishop N (2016): Bone strength in children: understanding basic bone biomechanics. Arch Dis Child, 101, 2-7.
8. 9. Gabrielli MG (2004): Carbonic anhydrases in chick extra-embryonic structures: a role for CA in bicarbonate reabsorption through the chorioallantoic membrane. J Enzym Inhib Med Ch, 19, 283-286.

9. 10. Kierończyk B, Rawski M, Józefiak D, et al (2017): Infectious and non-infectious factors associated with leg disorders in poultry–a review. Ann Anim Sci, 17, 645-669.
10. 11. Korver DR, Saunders-Blades JL, Nadeau KL (2004): Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: Quantitative computed tomography. Poult Sci, 83, 222–229.
11. 12. Kubota M, Abe E, Shinki T, et al (1981): Vitamin D metabolism and its possible role in the developing chick embryo. Biochem J, 194, 103-109.
12. 13. Nasir Z, Peebles ED (2018): Avian embryo nutrition and incubation. Poult Sci, 97, 2994-2995.
13. 14. Onbaşılar EE, Ünal N, Erdem E, et al (2015): Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages. Poult Sci, 94, 559-564.
14. 15. Onbaşılar EE, Güngör ÖF, Taban S, et al (2018): Comparison of different brown and white layer hybrid embryonic development and uptake of nutrients in the egg. Anim Reprod Sci, 198, 57-64.
15. 16. Onbaşılar EE, Güngör ÖF, Demir T, et al (2018): Femur Properties of Embryo in the Layer Hybrid and Pure Breeds. Braz J Poult Sci, 20, 805-810.
16. 17. Pechak DG, Kujawa MJ, Caplan, AI (1986): Morphology of bone development and bone remodeling in embryonic chick limbs. Bone, 7, 459-472.
17. 18. Sandılands V, Sparks N, Wilson S, et al (2005): Laying hens at depopulation: The impact of the production system on bird welfare. Br Poult Abst, 23- 24.
18. 19. Seo HJ, Cho YE, Kim T, et al (2010): Zinc may increase bone formation through stimulating cell proliferation, alkaline phosphatase activity and collagen synthesis in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Nutr Res Pract, 4, 356-361.
19. 20. Sevil Kilimci F, Kara ME (2013): Basic concepts to assessment of mechanical properties of bones. Animal Health Prod and Hyg, 2, 235-239.
20. 21. Starcher BC, Hill CH, Madaras JG (1980): Effect of zinc deficiency on bone collagenase and collagen turnover. J Nutr, 110, 2095-2102.
21. 22. Turek SL (1984): Physiology and mineralization of bone. Orthop. 1, 136-190.
22. 23. Whitehead CC, Fleming RH (2000): Osteoporosis in cage layers. Poult Sci, 79, 1033-1041.
23. 24. Whitehead C (2004): Skeletal Disorders in Laying Hens: The Problem of Osteoporosis and Bone Fractures. In: Welfare of the Laying Hen. Poultry Science Symposium Series. CABI Publishing, USA.
24. 25. Yair R, Cahaner A, Uni Z, et al (2017): Maternal and genetic effects on broiler bone properties during incubation period. Poult Sci, 96, 2301-2311.
25. 26. Yair R, Shahar R, Uni Z (2013): Prenatal nutritional manipulation by in ovo enrichment influences bone structure, composition, and mechanical properties. J Anim Sci, 91, 2784-2793.