Thoracoscopic partial pericardiectomy for the treatment of pericardial effusion in dogs

Abstract

Thoracoscopy is a minimally invasive imaging method used in the imaging of the thoracic cavity. In comparison with thoracotomy, thoracoscopy provides better visualization of even the smallest lesions localized in the thoracic cavity. With the use of thoracoscopy, the operation stress in the patient and tissue trauma are reduced, and operating time is shortened. The aim of this study was to evaluate 20 dogs with severe pericardial effusion, which manifested as severe circulation disorder and respiratory distress. The patients determined with pericardial effusion as a result of radiographic and echocardiographic examinations were applied with partial pericardiectomy to achieve permanent health and it was decided to apply this with the minimally invasive thoracoscopic method. The paraxiphoid-transdiaphragmatic approach was applied to the first ten patients and the intercostal approach to the latter. Applicability of thoracoscopic partial pericardiectomy, advantages compared to open surgery, differences between two approach techniques, disadvantages, complications, and success rates were evaluated. It was concluded that this procedure was a successful procedure for dogs and the transdiaphragmatic approach was more useful. In conclusion, thoracoscopic partial pericardiectomy was determined to be easy to apply and more advantageous than open thoracotomy operations.

Keywords

• dog
• pericardial effusion
• partial pericardiectomy
• thoracoscopy

References

1. Aronsohn MG, Carpenter JL (1999): Surgical Treatment of Idiopathic Pericardial Effusion in the Dog: 25 Cases (1978-1993). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 35, 521–525.
2. Atencia S, Doyle RS, Whitley NT (2013): Thoracoscopic pericardial window for management of pericardial effusion in 15 dogs. J Small Anim Pract, 54, 564–569.
3. Balsa I, Culp W (2019): Use of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer in Dogs and Cats. Vet Sci, 6, 33.
4. Brisson BA, Reggeti F, Bienzle D (2006): Portal site metastasis of invasive mesothelioma after diagnostic thoracoscopy in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 229, 980–983.
5. Burton CA, White RN (1996): Review of the technique and complications of median sternotomy in the dog and cat. J Small Anim Pract, 37, 516–522.
6. Carvajal JL, Case JB, Mayhew PD, et al (2019): Outcome in dogs with presumptive idiopathic pericardial effusion after thoracoscopic pericardectomy and pericardioscopy. Vet Surg, 48, O105–111.
7. Case JB, Maxwell M, Aman A, et al (2013): Outcome evaluation of a thoracoscopic pericardial window procedure or subtotal pericardectomy via thoracotomy for the treatment of pericardial effusion in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 242, 493–498.
8. De Ridder M, Kitshoff A, Devriendt N, et al (2017): Transdiaphragmatic pericardiectomy in dogs. Vet Rec, 1-6.

9. Edwards N (1996): The diagnostic value of pericardial fluid pH determination. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 32, 63–67.
10. Fransson BA, Mayhew PD (2015): Small Animal Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 296–297.
11. Hartmann HF, De Oliviera MT, Feranti JPS, et al (2019): Thoracoscopic pericardiectomy associated with fully implantable catheter via thoracoscopy in the management of mesothelioma in a bitch. J Vet Med Sci, 81, 946–948.
12. Hazelrigg SR, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, et al (1993): Thoracoscopic pericardiectomy for effusive pericardial disease. Ann Thorac Surg, 56, 792–795.
13. Humm KR, Keenaghan-Clark EA, Boag AK (2009): Adverse events associated with pericardiocentesis in dogs: 85 cases (1999-2006). J Vet Emerg Crit Care, 19, 352–356.
14. Jackson J, Richter KP, Launer DP (1999): Thoracoscopic partial pericardiectomy in 13 dogs. J Vet Intern Med, 13, 529–533.
15. Kocatürk M, Salcı H, Alasonyalılar-Demirer A, et al (2014): Bir Köpekte Malignant Perikardiyal Mezotelyoma ve Perikardiyal Efüzyon. Uludağ Üniversitesi Vet Fakültesi Derg, 28, 73–82.
16. Kocatürk M, Salcı H, İpek V, et al (2016): Clinical approach to etiology, diagnosis, and treatment in dogs with pericardial effusion – a retrospective study. Ank Univ Vet Fak Derg, 63, 289–296.
17. Liu H-P, Chang C-H, Lin PJ, et al (1994): Thoracoscopic management of effusive pericardial disease: Indications and technique. Ann Thorac Surg, 58, 1695–1697.
18. Maciver MA, Case BB, Monnet EL, et al (2017): Video-assisted extirpation of cranial mediastinal masses in dogs: 18 cases (2009–2014). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 250, 1283–1290.
19. Mayhew PD, Steffey MA, Fransson BA, et al (2019): Long-term outcome of video-assisted thoracoscopic thoracic duct ligation and pericardectomy in dogs with chylothorax: A multi-institutional study of 39 cases. Vet Surg, 48, O112–120.
20. McCarthy T (2005): Veterinary Endoscopy for the Small Animal Practitioner Elsevier, 229–278.
21. Petrella F, Radice D, Colombo N, et al (2018): Pericardial-peritoneal window for malignant pericardial effusion. Shanghai Chest, 2, 45.
22. Schmiedt C (2017): What is the optimal approach for pericardiectomy in dogs? Vet Rec, 180, 93–94.
23. Scollan KF, Bottorff B, Stieger-Vanegas S, et al (2015): Use of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of dogs with pericardial effusion. J Vet Intern Med, 29, 79-87.
24. Singh A, Scott J, Case JB, et al (2019): Optimization of surgical approach for thoracoscopic-assisted pulmonary surgery in dogs. Vet Surg, 48, O99–104.
25. Stafford Johnson M, Martin M, Binns S, et al (2004): A retrospective study of clinical findings, treatment and outcome in 143 dogs with pericardial effusion. J Small Anim Pract, 45, 546–552.
26. Walsh PJ, Remedios AM, Ferguson JF, et al (1999): Thoracoscopic versus open partial pericardectomy in dogs: Comparison of postoperative pain and morbidity. Vet Surg, 28, 472–479.
27. Walton RS (2001): Video-assisted thoracoscopy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 31, 729–759.